similar to: sieve not respecting userdb_mail setting?

I downloaded a binary build of release candidate 2, and it was simply a bare directory tree with no README files or other directions. Does one simply plop this in /usr/local or is there more to it? (I'm on OS X.) -- Perry E. Metzger perry at piermont.com

I'm experimenting with a 2.0 setup, using the sieve plugin for 2.0 from mercurial. Without sieve, everything seems to work fine. Once I put in a .dovecot.sieve file, though, nothing gets delivered, with the only hint of what's going wrong being this mess in syslog: Jul 7 13:18:00 bellman dovecot: lda(perry): Panic: file index-transaction.c: line 70 (index_transaction_init): assertion

On Sat, 6 May 2017 23:11:16 +0800 C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 11:07 PM, Perry E. Metzger via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > Howdy! > > > > I've noticed that requests for help by people like me who are > > developing front ends are often lost in the noise in the llvm-dev > >

On Sat, 6 May 2017 13:46:18 -0700 Sanjoy Das via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I'm not sure that will work well, because people won't usually > > wait a week to get their questions before moving on. If you're > > actively working full time on a project, you probably want > > answers in much less time. > > Sure s/week/day/ then.

On Sat, 6 May 2017 12:06:03 -0700 Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Perry E. Metzger via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > It makes sense to have a place for us to talk to each other where > > we're the dominant traffic, where our questions for each other > > aren't

On Sat, 6 May 2017 21:38:50 -0700 Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > Hi Perry, > > On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Perry E. Metzger > <perry at piermont.com> wrote: > >> Let me put it this way -- I'm pretty sure if you take it on > >> yourself to answer beginner questions on llvm-dev promptly, > >> nobody will *complain*.

Howdy! I've noticed that requests for help by people like me who are developing front ends are often lost in the noise in the llvm-dev list. Although LLVM is a wonderful and very productive framework, I've found that getting help on my front end has been very difficult, and learning necessary detail about the APIs and the like is often very, very challenging. Perhaps it would be good to

On Sun, 7 May 2017 00:01:34 +0800 C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > > Having a place dedicated to mutual aid among front end developers > > (and of course assistance from anyone else who is willing to > > answer questions) would be nice. > > > > I referred you to that list in speaking from experience. cfe-dev > may have started life as a

On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:14:11 +1000 Dean Michael Berris via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > FWIW, I think the "modern" way of doing any of this is with any one > of the following services (that don't need to be owned/maintained > by the LLVM Foundation): > > - Stack Overflow (maybe if it gets large enough, get a "vertical" > for just

Pardon the length of this reply, but it seemed useful to be explicit about my concerns. On Sun, 7 May 2017 00:55:51 +0800 C Bergstrom <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > You don't seem to be listening, but one last try. I listened. I respectfully disagree. > If you have a FE related question - Ask on cfe-dev and if you don't > get a response I'd be surprised. I

With this setting, all folders are empty, I guess understandable, because the mdbox has its own indexes stored locally with it. Does not explain though why inbox is empty. [@ dovecot]# cat special-userdb test:x:8267:231:Account with special settings for dovecot:/home/popusers/test:/bin/false:userdb_mail=mdbox:~/mdbox:INBOX=/ var/spool/mail/%u:INDEX=/var/dovecot/%u/index With this setting

Searching the archives there has been some discussion about the need for QOS routing on a mixed voice data broadband like ADSL. Has anyone run * on a production system with voice and data. Can anyone share what has to be done to secure the voice and throttle back the data? If a linux router is need can that run on the * box to reduce cost? All help is gratefully received, so I can plan a

Yes, I have still inbox mbox format because I have sendmail delivering there. I trying to migrate/convert step by step, with least possible impact for users. -----Original Message----- From: Aki Tuomi Sent: dinsdag 14 mei 2019 6:19 To: Marc Roos; Marc Roos via dovecot Subject: Re: Userdb userdb_mail=, error Mailbox list driver maildir++: maildir_name not supported by this driver > On

I have this default configuration [0], when use the userdb_mail to point to the mdbox location, the inbox subfolders show differently in a firebird client. So I decided to copy the whole default mail_location into the userdb_mail configuration [2]. But then I get errors [3]. Should I change the namespace configuration here, how? My default namespaces are inbox and 4archives [0] [@ ]#

Hi, ** Using Dovecot 2.2.22 and Postfix 3.1.0 ** I plan to migrate all accounts on my server from mbox to maildir storage but before i want to make some tests on dedicated accounts. To do so i want to overide the general "mail_location" ( mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u ) with "maildir:~/Maildir" only for some test accounts. To do so i modified my

Hi All, First of all, I am not native English speaker. While reading BUILD_VECTOR related code, for example, PPCTargetLowering::LowerBUILD_VECTOR, I see "splat" here and there. Could someone explain what it is (does splat mean the same thing across the whole code base)? Besides, from my English dictionary, I don't know why we call such thing as "splat"... :p Regards,

As in subject, if you for instance create a simple passwd-file with: test at domain.tld:{plain}pass:20000:10::/home/regular/.test::userdb_mail=maildir:%h/maildir Dovecot (rc23 & 27) will expand %h to empty string, and try to make a directory under / Mar 14 14:25:28 rasengan dovecot: IMAP(test at domain.tld): mkdir(/maildir/cur) failed: Permission denied Mar 14 14:25:28 rasengan dovecot:

Your log file almost looks like a bug in Asterisk doesn't it? Why call poll() with a zero timeout while passing only one FD? and then why do the read when there is no data? Read the man pages for all the system calls Take a look at the source chan_sip.c /* Wait for sched or io */ res = ast_sched_wait(sched); if ((res < 0) || (res > 1000))

mdbox:~/mdbox:INBOX=/ var/spool/mail/%u:CONTROL=~/mail/control:INDEX=/var/dovecot/%u/index:LAYOUT=maildir++ You can't use LAYOUT=maildir++ here. Aki On 14.5.2019 10.38, Marc Roos wrote: > Yes, I have still inbox mbox format because I have sendmail delivering > there. I trying to migrate/convert > step by step, with least possible impact for users. > > > >

Hello, dovecot users. I'm trying to cope with following problem I have single computer which will be going to be final destination for several virtual domains. Domains are stored in LDAP catalog. Dovecot will be working together with Postfix MTA running on same computer. I'm a bit confused how to achieve following thing: I want Postfix to use Dovecot LMTP server for mail delivery. All