similar to: dovecot director service

Hello. 1. I have two identically hosts 2. I have set up replication between two hosts 3. I have 'Y' AS proxy_maybe in password_query. 4. password_query returns one of this one hosts 5. I set this parameters in dovecot config: disable_plaintext_auth = yes ssl = yes auth_mechanisms = plain login for enforce use encrypted connections by client programs.

Hi, we are getting some core dumps with signal 6 in ltmp on a dovecot director proxy server, like this: Dec 5 14:31:51 sproxy1 dovecot: lmtp(29999): Panic: file lmtp-proxy.c: line 376 (lmtp_proxy_output_timeout): assertion failed: (proxy->data_input->eof) Dec 5 14:31:51 sproxy1 dovecot: lmtp(29999): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0() [0x363323d99a] ->

Hi Folks, I spent quite some time yesterday understanding how proxy works along with the director. I came to the conclusion that proxy_maybe and director cannot be used together, but this isn?t a true incompatibility so much as caused by the way things are handled and the order they are processed in. The way proxy_maybe works is that it is processed by the auth provider once it gets the

I just noticed this error in my logs: director: Error: doveadm not compatible with this server (mixed old and new binaries?) director: Error: director(10.161.192.28:541/right): Wrong protocol in socket (director-doveadm vs director) The first error I removed by changing director_doveadm_port = 541 to director_doveadm_port = 542 Not really sure why that fixed it. The second error I

When using proxy_maybe CRAM-MD5 authentication fails when the connection is proxied. Is this expected behavior? Is proxy_maybe too simplified for this case? We're using SQL so I could rewrite the query with IFs to fake proxy_maybe and return the password as NULL and nologin as Y, but if it works that way couldn't it work with proxy_maybe? This works: password_query = \ SELECT NULL AS

Hi, I think option-2 below seems better or am I missing something with director concept. 1. As director and back-end in same server (broken) not recommended, I need minimum 4 servers (2 for director, 2 back-end IMAP). Indexes and mail must be in NFS shared storage(not optimal), as a user may land on any of the back-end servers (assuming no static mapping of user from pass DB). 2) Proxy_may

I'm experiencing some problems similar to those described in http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-July/137250.html except with 2.0.9. Adding http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-July/084906.html to the main config didn't seem to help, nor did setting the list of director and backend servers to just the system itself. I get a banner connecting to port 143: [root at retr01 log]# telnet

Hello Timo, The last time I checked my understanding about director was that : 1. backend/"real" imap servers should not be on the same host (or the same dovecot instance) to avoid proxying loops. Is it still the case with the latest 2.1 stable release ? Is there a plan to be able to run director and real server on the same host, thus requiring only 2 hosts instead of 4 to have

hi, mutt -f imap://max at test.local@127.0.0.1 Could not connect to 127.0.0.1 (Connection refused). lsof -i dovecot 20200 root 5u IPv4 233361 TCP localhost:imap2 (LISTEN) imap-logi 20204 dovecot 0u IPv4 233361 TCP localhost:imap2 (LISTEN) imap-logi 20205 dovecot 0u IPv4 233361 TCP localhost:imap2 (LISTEN) imap-logi 20206 dovecot 0u IPv4 233361 TCP

We are looking at deploying several pop/imap servers to house the mail for 15,000 or more mailbox accounts. We are contemplating on the design and are looking at using MySQL auth (we already have a MySQL environment in place for our user auth to live) and proxy_maybe so each server can proxy for all the others and we just have a network load balancer distribute the incoming connections to all of

Hi, I would like to have two seperate imap listeners, with different authentication settings, but the mailstore and userbase etc will be identical. I know I can do this: > service imap-login { > inet_listener imap { > port = 143 > } > inet_listener imap2 { > port = 144 > } > } But I'm unsure how to configure imap/143 with "driver =

Does anyone know if dovecot support regex lookups for proxy/proxy_maybe, rather than mysql/ldap etc? I've been comparing it with perdition to see which one might be better for us to do layer7 username switching. Perdition supports the ability to not have any auth/db looks, but rather just a regex file that parses the usernames as they come in and forwards to the particular machine on the

Hello, I run Dovecot?2.3.2.1 and I keep separate index / control files: mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir:INDEX=/liveindexes/indexes/%d/%n:CONTROL=/liveindexes/control/%d/%n When I try to set an ACL on a folder, I get this error: Dec 26 17:35:56 imap2 dovecot: imap(user at domain.com): Error: file_dotlock_open(/home/vpopmail/domains/domain.com/user/Maildir/.Test/dovecot-acl) failed: Resource

Alright, but do you know why the error happens ? On Thursday, 27-12-2018 at 2:51 Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 27 December 2018 at 00:55 Qmail Dev wrote: > > > Hello, > > I run Dovecot?2.3.2.1 and I keep separate index / control files: > > > mail_location = > maildir:~/Maildir:INDEX=/liveindexes/indexes/%d/%n:CONTROL=/liveindexes/control/%d/%n > > When I try

Hello, I'm using proxy_maybe and auth_default_realm. It seems that when a user logs in without the domain name, relying on auth_default_realm, and the "host" field points to the local server, I get the Proxying loops to itself error. It does work as expected - log on to the local server without proxying, if the user does include the domain name in the login. (IP's and

I'm getting lots of errors like this (possibly on every message delivery): imap2 dovecot: lmtp(rlaager at wiktel.com): Error: OU02K+gQmFhUAwAAVtfydQ : sieve: binary save: failed to create temporary file: open(/var/lib/dovecot/sieve/junk-mail.svbin.ima p2.852.) failed: Permission denied (euid=500(vmail) egid=500(vmail) missing +w perm: /var/lib/dovecot/ sieve, dir owned by 0:0 mode=0755)

Hi all, We have Exim using Dovecot for authentication. Dovecot, in turn, consults a custom internal server that answers Dovecot?s userdb queries. When IMAP connections arrive, for some users we want to forward those connections--without authentication--to an external IMAP server. For these users, we return ?proxy_maybe? and ?nopassword? in the authn response from our userdb server. This tells

It's very difficult at least. I can't instantly think any sensible way forward, but you might be able to get somewhere using %a variable. Aki > On December 31, 2016 at 11:38 AM mj <lists at merit.unu.edu> wrote: > > > Hi, > > Does the lack of replies mean that what I'm asking is not possible? > > (or am I missing something SO obvious that nobody

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1269 Bug ID: 1269 Summary: using the internal lookup table vs. the local system's /etc/services (or so) generally prevents nft from working Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: Gentoo Status: NEW

Or. maybe it is the holidays and people actually have a life? On December 31, 2016 4:38:53 AM EST, mj <lists at merit.unu.edu> wrote: >Hi, > >Does the lack of replies mean that what I'm asking is not possible? > >(or am I missing something SO obvious that nobody bothers to point it >out..?) > >MJ > >On 12/29/2016 09:23 PM, mj wrote: >> Hi, >>