similar to: disable plaintext auth ... only for some addresses

Quick question: My PHP script is now able to connect to the manager port and successfully authenticate using MD5. I would strongly prefer not to do plaintext authentication at all. Would anyone object to plaintext authentication being left out? -- JustThe.net Internet & Multimedia Svcs. [The Fusion of Content & Connectivity] 22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950 Steve

Server: Ubuntu 9.04 desktop edition Dovecot 1.1.11 Issue: I have set dovecot.conf with: disable_plaintext_auth = no but everytime I have a client (Windows Live Mail, ubuntu evolution) connect from the Internet, I have the following type of message: Plaintext authentication disallowed on non-secure (SSL/TLS) connections. in my mail.log, I have: Jul 28 15:09:43 "name" dovecot:

I'm working with a company that presently has a Linux mailserver which all users have (no shell) accounts on. Mail is accessed via pop3 with plaintext authentication. They want to move to a system using imap with SSL. I'm building them a new server. I'd like to offer both for a while so we can work the bugs out and migrate users over to SSL imap over time. It appears that in order

Server == samba-2.2.7-3.7.2 Plaintext Auth daemon mode, RedHat 7.2 all errata applied, 2.4.20-(stock errata latest) Clients == WindowsXP (forced to use plaintext auth) all patched up. Software == Multitude of lists sorting and management using the server as it's store for data. Trouble == Every once in a while after daemon uptime of a month so, files written to the network drives will

Hi, I have dovecot 1.0rc15 on Debian and would like to allow plaintext auth not only from the local IP address but from the entire local network, but not from everywhere. Is that configurable? I am looking for something like "allow_plaintext_auth = 10.8.0.0/24". Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber |

Hey All, I'm just wondering whether this is what caused my server to crash. Started last night in NZ land. Jun 20 19:22:11 elm dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected (tried to use disallowed plaintext auth): user=<>, rip=attackerip, lip=10.0.0.3, session=<0C8LzpDfZQDINsQC> occasionally get Jun 20 19:22:52 elm dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected (no auth attempts in 1 secs):

Hi I have problem with dovecot 2.2.10 - plaintext auth without SSL is not working. I'm upgrading old server and want that settings "stay same" as on old server. SSL has to be optional. /var/log/maillog *pop3-login: Disconnected (tried to use disallowed plaintext auth): user=<>, rip=_._._._, lip=_._._._, session=<cxPkm4Ud5gBb7YZ/>* my settings: [root at mail dovecot]#

Hi, I want to use CRAM-MD5 or DIGEST-MD5 (non-plaintext) authentication for master users, but Dovecot 2.2.13 rejects it with the following log: Sep 1 06:18:08 localhost dovecot: auth: passwd-file(masteruser,10.0.1.20,master,<ZA1s9/oBgAAKAAEU>): Master user logging in as u0001 Sep 1 06:18:08 localhost dovecot: auth: cram-md5(u0001 at example.jp,10.0.1.20,<ZA1s9/oBgAAKAAEU>):

Once again, I am trying to add a machine to my Win2003 AD (that has Services for Unix installed). I am using Xubuntu 9.10, and samba 3.4.0. I set up Kerberos, and am getting a ticket. I have successfully joined the domain. # net ads join -U administrator Enter administrator's password: Using short domain name -- DACRIB Joined 'DUAL-BOOTER' to realm 'DaCrib.local' wbinfo -u

Traditionally this server has only accepted plaintext authentications; however, we want to change that and enable TLS/SSL. The challenge is the server has hundreds of IP addresses it binds to to listen on ports 110/143. Enabling TLS/SSL is not an option because as this is a virtual hosting environment, if a connection comes in on any other hostname other than the specific one tied to the crt all

Dear Sirs, I have Postfix 2.5 with Dovecot 1.0.0 as authentication server. Can I disable SMTP plaintext authentications for WAN clients, but allow it for LAN ones?

Enhanced OS. General rules I use: -Do not use SIP transformations (the VOIP tab), these cause random RTP = issues, and once you start forwarding calls between users, all things go = to heck. You are better off using NAT/qualify in your sip.conf. -Do not use SonicOS Standard (all new Sonicwalls should come with = Enhanced now anyway) as there is no method to increase the timeout for = UDP rules,

Hello, After an almost 19 year gap, I need to ask this list for help again :-) I have somewhat specific circumstances, where I think I can tolerate plaintext passwords on the wire as long as I get samba to authenticate against the system /etc/shadow (using PAM) in exchange. 0) I'm using Debian 8.4 (jessie), samba packages 2:4.2.10+dfsg-0+deb8u3. 1) I have created user smbtest with password

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 21:28:19 +0100 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > Am 04.03.19 um 21:18 schrieb Mark Foley via samba: > >> It shouldn't, you normally only have one gateway, it is by definition > >> the 'gateway' to the WAN & internet, so I would use the same one on all > >> your machines. > > > > The LAN host

There is a SonicWall Pro 2040 to which I successfully established a VPN tunnel under Windows XP using SonicWall VPN client. Now, I'm looking for a way to establish a VPN tunnel to the same SonicWall device under Linux. Installing the SonicWall VPN client under wine 0.9.27 failed ans as far as I understand a posting of 2006 it's doubtful if this type of software will ever be installable

Hello Has anyone else run into a problem with dovecot pop3 and sonicwall? A week after switching to dovecot we had two local customers call and report they could no longer download emails with attachments. It turned out to be the email macro filter on the router. After the first report I thought maybe the customer had just changed something or it was a fluke, but then a day later we had the

Hi all, I currently have an Asterisk test server behind a TZ170 Sonicwall firewall / NAT box, with several DIDs. I've found that inbound IAX2 calls don't work reliably (i.e., I get a busy tone) unless I enable "Use Consistent NAT" in the Sonicwall. This feature is poorly documented by Sonicwall, so I thought I'd pass it along. Has anyone else run into this, or figured

On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 12:58:17 -0500 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 17:18:31 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 11:48:00 -0500 > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 14:50:38 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > > > >

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 21:18:36 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 15:57:16 -0500 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 20:43:17 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 15:18:31 -0500 > > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >

I am running Samba 3.4.8 as a PDC on Solaris 10. I recently made this the WINS master- previously the BDC (Samba 3.0.37 on another Solaris 10 server.) I also use Sonicwall ipsec VPN for remote access (Windows XP clients.) The sonicwall client creates a virtual NIC on the client so that the client can have an IP address directly on the company LAN (ie. the same LAN as the samba