similar to: windows live mail + dovecot and nfs

Hi Jose, On 28 February 2018 at 18:28, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > I applied the workarround for this bug and now df shows the right size: > > That is good to hear. > [root at stor1 ~]# df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterfs/vol0 > /dev/sdc1

Hi Jose, On 28 February 2018 at 22:31, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > My initial setup was composed of 2 similar nodes: stor1data and stor2data. > A month ago I expanded both volumes with a new node: stor3data (2 bricks > per volume). > Of course, then to add the new peer with the bricks I did the 'balance > force' operation.

I'm sorry for my last incomplete message. Below the output of both volumes: [root at stor1t ~]# gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

Hi Nithya, I applied the workarround for this bug and now df shows the right size: [root at stor1 ~]# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterfs/vol0 /dev/sdc1 50T 16T 34T 33% /mnt/glusterfs/vol1 stor1data:/volumedisk0 101T 3,3T 97T 4% /volumedisk0 stor1data:/volumedisk1

Hi Nithya, My initial setup was composed of 2 similar nodes: stor1data and stor2data. A month ago I expanded both volumes with a new node: stor3data (2 bricks per volume). Of course, then to add the new peer with the bricks I did the 'balance force' operation. This task finished successfully (you can see info below) and number of files on the 3 nodes were very similar . For volumedisk1 I

Hi Nithya, Below the output of both volumes: [root at stor1t ~]# gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------

Hi Jose, There is a known issue with gluster 3.12.x builds (see [1]) so you may be running into this. The "shared-brick-count" values seem fine on stor1. Please send us "grep -n "share" /var/lib/glusterd/vols/volumedisk1/*" results for the other nodes so we can check if they are the cause. Regards, Nithya [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260

Hi Nag Pavan Chilakam Can I use this command "gluster vol add-brick vol1 replica 2 file01g:/brick3/data/vol1 file02g:/brick4/data/vol1" in both file server 01 and 02 exited without add new servers. Is it ok for expanding volume? Thanks for your support Regards, Giang 2017-06-14 22:26 GMT+07:00 Nag Pavan Chilakam <nag.chilakam at gmail.com>: > Hi, > You can use add-brick

Hi, Some days ago all my glusterfs configuration was working fine. Today I realized that the total size reported by df command was changed and is smaller than the aggregated capacity of all the bricks in the volume. I checked that all the volumes status are fine, all the glusterd daemons are running, there is no error in logs, however df shows a bad total size. My configuration for one volume:

Hi, I have a lab with 10 machines acting as storage servers for some compute machines, using glusterfs to distribute the data as two volumes. Created using: gluster volume create vol1 192.168.10.{221..230}:/data/vol1 gluster volume create vol2 replica 2 192.168.10.{221..230}:/data/vol2 and mounted on the client and server machines using: mount -t glusterfs 192.168.10.221:/vol1 /mnt/vol1 mount

Running 3.0.4 on FreeBSD 5.2.1... I have two directories... drwxrwxr-x root data_current /usr/vol1/current drwxrwx--- root data_current /usr/vol1/hold If a file is in /usr/vol1/hold with the following attributes... -rwxrwx--- root data_hold file1 ...and a user MOVES it to /usr/vol1/current it has the following attributes... -rwxrwx--- root data_hold file1 ...if the user COPIES

Hi, I have a cluster of 10 servers all running Fedora 24 along with Gluster 3.8. I'm planning on doing rolling upgrades to Fedora 27 with Gluster 3.12. I saw the documentation and did some testing but I would like to run my plan through some (more?) educated minds. The current setup is: Volume Name: vol0 Distributed-Replicate Number of Bricks: 2 x (2 + 1) = 6 Bricks: Brick1:

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Ziemowit Pierzycki <ziemowit at pierzycki.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a cluster of 10 servers all running Fedora 24 along with > Gluster 3.8. I'm planning on doing rolling upgrades to Fedora 27 with > Gluster 3.12. I saw the documentation and did some testing but I > would like to run my plan through some (more?) educated minds. >

Hi, I am rsyncing from my source server A to a destination server B. A/vol1 contains two files syslog.txt and syslog.bak B/vol1 contains five files syslog.txt, syslog.bak, initlog.txt, internal.txt, and internal.bak. I want to preserve the 5 files on B/vol1 when I do rsync from A to B. Here is the command I use: rsync -av --delete --exclude-from=EXCLUDEFILE A/ B I've tried the option

Team, **Please respond to me and my coworker listed in the Cc, since neither one of us are on this alias** QUICK PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: Cu created a dataset which contains all the zvols for a particular zone. The zone is then given access to all the zvols in the dataset using a match statement in the zoneconfig (see long problem description for details). After the initial boot of the zone

Just installed Nexenta and I''ve been playing around with zfs. root at hzsilo:/tank# uname -a SunOS hzsilo 5.11 NexentaOS_20070105 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris root at hzsilo:/tank# zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT home 89.5K 219G 32K /export/home tank 330K 1.78T 51.9K /tank tank/iscsi_luns 147K

hi there ! I want to change a novell-netware server to a samba server, and there i have a big problem with the file-permitions ! we use a big database-system. the clients searches for the programs and for the data's on the same drive, so i must have one share with different rights (rwx ... for data and rx for programs) the directory structure is the following: vol1\ \flex31d

Hi, I've got troubles after few minutes of glusterfs operations. I setup a 4-node replica 4 storage, with 2 bricks on every server: # gluster volume create vms replica 4 transport tcp 192.168.7.1:/srv/vol1 192.168.7.2:/srv/vol1 192.168.7.3:/srv/vol1 192.168.7.4:/srv/vol1 192.168.7.1:/srv/vol2 192.168.7.2:/srv/vol2 192.168.7.3:/srv/vol2 192.168.7.4:/srv/vol2 I started copying files with

I am trying to configure a public file share on \\fs1\vol1 From a Windows 7 command prompt, I enter: dir \\fs1\vol1 Windows says: Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password. Where am I going wrong? Error log says: " SPNEGO login failed: NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER" - that must have something to do with this, but I thought that was the point of "map to guest = Bad User"

Hi, ZFS experts, From ZFS release notes, " Solaris 10 6/06 and Solaris 10 11/06: Do Not Place the Root File Systemof a Non-Global Zone on ZFS. The zonepath of a non-global zone should not reside on ZFS for this release. This action might result in patching problems and possibly prevent the system from being upgraded to a later Solaris 10 update release." So my question is, do we