similar to: wrong startup information in production environment

Hi, first off thanks Ezra for Merb - it''s certainly interesting and I''m keen to have a play. However, I''m having difficulties in getting started. I''ve followed the docs for setting up mrblog and everything seems to be installed correctly, and merb appears to start fine: $ merb you must install the markaby gem to use .mab templates you must install the

Hi, Sorry if this is a stupid question! I used to have a site running on Merb 0.1.0. When running as a cluster, it would automatically start a drb process to co-ordinate the upload progress monitoring. Since uploading to 0.3.7 (a bit of a jump!), the drb process hasn''t started automatically. I seem to start one if I run merb -s 32323 manually, but when I do check on a file

In the example application named "sample_app", comment.jerb contains the following line: $(''comments'').update(<%=js partial(:comments) %>); What does the ''js'' method do to/with, if anything at all, ''partial(:comments)''? Merb is quite fun to use and I''m starting to get a feel for it and ruby. I''m surprised at

Hi all, I was just wondering if this is the intended behavior. Here is my setup: controller def index respond_to do |f| f.xml { render :xml => true } f.html { render :layout => :none } end end In my views I have a file for each type index.herb index.xerb The first request I send is cached and interferes with the other one. For example, if I send an xml request

Hi all, I''m wondering about my sanity here. There''s probably something simple I overlooked. First off, I have close to zero experience with Merb. 1. I configured use_orm :activerecord in config/dependencies.rb; 2. I have a file named app/models/measurement.rb which looks like this: class Measurement < Observation end 3. I have another file named

Is anyone developing with HAML templates in Merb? I had to do a few hacks but got it generally working (Merb trunk). I did have to do odd things like print @_layout_content straight out instead of calling catch_content(:layout). And, templates seem to be cached even if I set :cache_templates to false in merb.yml. I hope to be at the MerbHack night at RailsConf and would love to hack on this part

Hi All, I''ve come across the following problem with merb 0.5.3 (ruby 1.8.6 / Mac OS X Leopard). Basically, when I type ''merb'' or ''merb -i'' from within the app''s root, It starts, compiles the routes and then exits. Any ideas??? This is a brand spanking new merb app: josh at JDS-MacBook:~/Projects/schmerb$ merb Merb started with these

Hello! What is the simplest way to make merb respond to the client sending Accept-Encoding: gzip? Just checking if it exists, otherwise I''ll implement it myself. Regards, Magnus

Trunk Issue: Because of the use of ''autoload'', template handlers other than Erubis are not loaded automatically (Haml, XMLBuilder). Either this should be fixed, or the documentation should be updated to instruct people how to use non-Erb template engines. Apparently the solution is to do something like this in merb_init.rb: ::Merb::AbstractController.register_engine

Hello Steve, use the following configuration for the transport and bind this transport to the trunk: [transport_name] type=transport protocol=tls bind=192.168.13.24 ; your bind IP ca_list_file=/etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt ; method=tlsv1_2 verify_server=yes allow_reload=no ;tos=0xb8 ;cos=3 external_media_address=your.ext.host.name ; hostname pointing to your ext. IP

Thanks, Michael. A few questions: Is [transport_name] a reserved word, or am I supposed to replace it with a name of my own, like '[did-transport]'? Some of the keywords I haven't seen before. Is ca_list_file supposed to be an aggregate of the public and private key? And what are the 'method,' 'tos' and 'cos' keywords, which are commented out in your

Greetings ! My goal is to get Twilio trunking working, and with TLS/SRTP. I see this concerning message in my log: [Feb 7 16:50:26] ERROR[20596] res_sorcery_config.c: Could not create an object of type 'endpoint' with id ?twilio' from configuration file ?pjsip.conf? Thus, ?pjsip show endpoints? does not show the endpoint for the Twilio trunk. Hoping for a sanity check of

I've seen this happen three times in the wild now.  I've been trying to isolate the source of the issue, but so far it seems like there's not enough debug output to know why this occurs. Long story short: - Start Asterisk - PJSIP Handles receiving INVITE from ITSP via WAN (Asterisk is behind NAT).  SIP is handled correctly, Asterisk responds OK with RTP media address of

All, I see this item on the merb-0.0.8 release notes Added rails session parasite mode. I am assuming merbs can piggy back off the rails current session. How does one achieve that ? Thanks Fernand -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/merb-devel/attachments/20070112/0803f46e/attachment.html

Greetings, I posted this not on the Rails mailing list and didn''t get a definitive response so I thought I''d post it here, since I figure lots of you are using mongrel with Rails apps. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I''ve been using file-based fragment caching and DB-based session caching quite extensively. I decided to try out memcached for both to

Not sure if anyone else has had this problem. I was running on merb edge fine a few days ago. Last night I went to merb 0.4.0 via gem install and now any call to session[:foo] causes an error >> undefined method ''[]'' for nil:NilClass I have uninstalled and reinstalled merb with no luck. dependencies.rb use_orm :activerecord merb.yml :session_store: active_record Gems

I want to configure communication with my phone provider using TLS for all the obvious reasons. Since I'm behind a firewall, I'll be needing to do it with NAT. There are examples of UDP plus NAT in pjsip.conf, but none for TLS plus NAT. Would it be correct to set up the TLS transport stanza to look like the [transport-udp-nat] stanza example, replacing UDP with TLS in lines like

The following construct is an ActiveSupport-ism: returning(Foo.new) do |foo| ... end I don''t especially like it, since it''s both more verbose and less efficient than the direct alternative: foo = Foo.new ... foo It doesn''t occur many times in Merb, so does anyone agree with me that it should be removed? I tried doing this (patch attached) and I find

I was looking in using an xml_builder template to do something like: blee.xerb xml.blees do <% for blee in @blees %> xml.blee = blee.name <% end %> end It looks like the xml_builder template can''t expand the erb tag. It this not the correct way to expand and xml template ? Thanks ! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

All, I have just updated to the latest release of merb 0.4 and I am wondering how I can get my controller changes to reload without bouncing the server ? I am running in dev mode but my changes to my merb controller don''t seem to get picked up on new requests. Also say I have a controller that needs to render an alternate xml format ie something like: