similar to: Simple authentication problem

Hello all: I''ve been using Shorewall for quite a while at my office and it''s been great! Thanks for the work! I''ve just set up a firewall at home to keep my teenagers under control (shorewall, squid and dansguardian). I''ve also set up a cron job that switches my shorewall rules between a day and a night configuration. The night configuration blocks

Hello Can you share your experience with running XEN on different hardware? Does any body run XEN either 2.0.6/7 or 3.0devel on following machines: 1) nForce4 based motherboard either with single or dual core CPU 2) ASUS 1U server AP140R-E1 --- P4 http://www.asus.com/products4.aspx?modelmenu=2&model=137&l1=9&l2=40&l3=116 3) MICROSTAR Server Barebone K1-1000D (MS-9245) 1U ---

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I mentioned a ghost file. Here is the dump (less than 65M): http://dev.mccme.ru/~raskin/btrfs.dump ghost file is: 885dj1l4788pymp3bk2f3dz52ggcvw4v-empty/garbage-1/mwave.h.tmp-31838-1822528541 It has a name, but stat fails (so no inode, I guess). Also I can create another file with the same name in the directory. I cannot remove the file, or

Dear User, the message with following attributes has not been delivered, because contains an infected object. Sender = samba@lists.samba.org (may be forged) Recipients = marketing@microstar.ru Subject = hi Message-ID = [unknown-id] Antivirus filter report: --- Dr.Web report --- Following virus(es) has been found: infected with Win32.HLLM.MyDoom.32768 Dr.Web detailed report:

Hello. I am continuing my tests of BtrFS under a practical workload. Recently an incorrect poweroff (or maybe a small bug in BtrFS) caused a small data loss. The actual damage was non-existent. I used old branch, so maybe the relevant code is already improved. 1. Why btrfsck says "bad block" on that partition? What does it mean? My fist reaction was to use badblocks. It found no

Hi all, I have had this problem since day 1 on my new server. It has run since November 15th 2008, and serve approx. 10 GB worth of web traffic per month for the main site and then some 40 domains with mail and small web pages. (hence - it's NOT that busy yet) I started with 7.1-RELEASE-pX since I didn't have problems straight off - but it didn't last long. After a few days of

Hello-- I've been playing with the privacy options on my home/home-office system since August last year, and have some results, gleaned from my CDR records, which over the last 13 months, number a total of 8672, which includes incoming, as well as outgoing calls. Before I start spitting out numbers, let me note that with the current setup, I haven't had to tell a single telemarketer

Does anyone have an idea how to fix this problem. When installing from floppy, it appears that everything installs correctly to hda1. I can see all the files that get installed on hda1 when mounting it. However, after I change the boot options to boot from hard disk I get the above error. I have never had this problem before, it usually installs very fast and painless. The only difference this

Hello Guys, Any idea what this means: WARNING[2138]: chan_zap.c:4409 my_zt_write: Write returned -1 (Resource temporarily unavailable) on channel 1 - audio may have been lost Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050506/985db277/attachment.htm

Forgive me if this is a FAQ, but I just can't seem to get it to work... I have an internal network with an NT Server running as a PDC and a WINS Server. I have a Linux box serving as a dial-in ISP provider and firewall to the internet. I have Win-95, Win-98, and Win-NT Workstation users dialing in to the Linux box. We want the remote users to be able to browse the in-house network. The

I've recently upgraded a server and am having an issue with symlinks that used to work but are now broken. The links are on one of the filesystems shared by Samba, but point to directories on an NFS-mounted volume. The permissions and export on the NFS volume are such that both root and normal users on this Samba server can access the contents correctly. However, when I try to follow the

Hello all: I''ve got a confusing issue. I had a working shorewall configuration (based on the two interface model) using DNAT for redirection to my HTTP server. The HTTP server is on my inside network (I know - bad juju, but one thing at a time). I changed my configuration this morning to use views in my BIND (named) configuration. Everyone outside the firewall is able to get in

Join your colleagues for the 20th highly acclaimed international forum to hear the latest implementations of biometrics... The Winter 2010 BIOMETRICS SUMMIT: -------------------- Practical Implementation Strategies, Market Trends And Best Practices In Government And Business -------------------- February 22-25, 2010 - Miami, FL

JOIN YOUR COLLEAGUES FOR THE 20TH HIGHLY ACCLAIMED INTERNATIONAL FORUM TO HEAR THE LATEST IMPLEMENTATIONS OF BIOMETRICS... THE WINTER 2010 BIOMETRICS SUMMIT: -------------------- Practical Implementation Strategies, Market Trends And Best Practices In Government And Business -------------------- February 22-25, 2010 - Miami, FL

Hi, if I connect from a winxp machine to my samba share and create a new file, it does not get the permissions specified by "create mask" and "force create mode" at first. Only after I modify the permissions on the client, the file finally gets the right permissions on the server. Thereby it does not matter what I change on the client, even if I remove all access rights.

Hello list, I'm facing a little issue with dahdi attempting to load the OSLEC echo canceller into my current kernel. After compiling dahdi 2.3.0.1 with OSLEC support, I get the following error when set 'oslec' as the echocanceller: DAHDI_ATTACH_ECHOCAN failed on channel 1: Invalid argument (22) - Similar errors are *NOT* present using other echo canncelers. - I tried adding the

So yesterday I got was able to get a domU successfully using a PCI SCSI card. This morning I restarted the host server. When I try to start up the same domU I get this error: Error: pci: improper device assignment specified: pci: 0000:0e:04.0 must be co-assigned to the same guest with 0000:0e:04.0, but it is not owned by pciback. How do I make this card owned by pciback on reboot. Do I need to

All, I have been using Shorewall successfully for years on many different machines and configurations. However, I just built a new box and wanted to setup shorewall on it. I''m running SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 and Shorewall 4.4.8 (latest version as of this e-mail) using the RPM download. I am able to install Shorewall just fine and I''m able to setup everything except

While generating a libcall from floating point comparison, it always assumes that the return type of those libcalls is i32. Why not allow Targets to provide the correct return type? EVT RetVT = MVT::i32; // <-- here SDValue Ops[2] = { LHSInt, RHSInt }; NewLHS = MakeLibCall(LC1, RetVT, Ops, 2, false/*sign irrelevant*/, dl); NewRHS = DAG.getConstant(0, RetVT); CCCode =

These warnings occur in the process of creating lots of symlinks before system hangs (well, this time I was luckier and system didn''t hang..) I checked: when system hanged, it was always the same offset in the same function. I failed to get more good traces. I send the best I got. After lots of attempts I passed the usual hanging step.. With lots of warnings I already mentioned.