similar to: Saving Sent Messages to Sent Folder

On 12/16/2017, 5:10:14 AM, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> wrote: > Op 12/14/2017 om 6:07 PM schreef Tanstaafl: >> One other point. >> >> Adding support for something like this that also requires Clients to add >> support for it is just begging for a feature that never gets used. >> >> Stephan, are you sure there is no (fairly simple) way to

> On December 20, 2017 at 4:39 PM Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > > > On Sat Dec 16 2017 15:41:25 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Tanstaafl > <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > > Ok, well, my ignorance is probably glaring here, but what I meant was, > > the make the BURL/URLAUTH pieces strictly between Dovecot and the > >

Hi, As some of you know, I started implementing the SMTP submission proxy a few years ago. It acts as a front-end for any MTA, adding the necessary functionality for an SMTP submission service, also known as a Mail Submission Agent (MSA) (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6409). The main reason I created this, back then, was implementing the BURL capability (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4468). The

Op 12-12-2017 om 15:28 schreef Tanstaafl: > This is fantastic Stephan! Especially since I'll soon be rolling a new > Dovecot server to act as a backup for our current Office 365 mail, as > well as to be prepared in case I can ever talk the boss into migrating > back to dovecot (we were using Dovecot for a really long time until he > was convinced by others that we 'had'

On 13.12.2017 21:41, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 12/12/2017, 1:39:08 PM, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> wrote: >> However, keep in mind that for this particular feature we're just >> providing the "chicken" as it were. The "egg", i.e. client support, is >> still to come. Apart from Trojita (which I think is still not widely >> used), I

Thank you Timo for beginning the port of URLAUTH, BURL, and CATENATE from 1.2 to 2.0. Attached please find two patches that finish the port to 2.0. One patch updates the dovecot-2.0-urlauth branch and is based on the tip of that branch. The other patch adds the full support to dovecot-2.0.beta5. The resulting URLAUTH/BURL/CATENATE code is the same. Please let me know if you have any questions

One other point. Adding support for something like this that also requires Clients to add support for it is just begging for a feature that never gets used. Stephan, are you sure there is no (fairly simple) way to make this an SMTP service that any email client that supports SMTP can use? On 12/14/2017, 10:57:44 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > On 12/14/2017,

Hello Dovecot community, Below please find a patch that adds support to dovecot-1.2.11 for: - RFC 4467 - IMAP URLAUTH Extension - RFC 4468 - Submission BURL - RFC 4469 - IMAP CATENATE Extension URLAUTH URLAUTH is added as a plugin so it can be disabled to satisfy site security requirements. Each user's URLAUTH keys for all mailboxes are stored in a file named

Sorry if this seems elementary - but a question on implementation/usage/purpose of this.? My understanding is at this time the SMTP proxy server is only that - it does not implement any further functionality.? So its availability now is purely for testing purposes.? Is that accurate? I secondly assume that this intended for trusted clients only - so this is not intended for processing email

You know, I was thinking: wouldn't it be nice to have RFC 4468 (Message Submission BURL Extension) support in dovecot? Maybe we should ask the guys from Apple to contribute some support for it, I have a gut feeling they would gladly do so ;) Kind regards -- Erik.

v2.2 hg now has support for NOTIFY extension. The only thing missing is support for SubscriptionChange events. Now would be a good time for IMAP clients to start implementing and testing it. :) I remember K9 developers at least said they were just waiting for Dovecot to support it first. v2.2 implements some other extensions also: BINARY, CATENATE and MOVE. Stephan has also implemented URLAUTH

Hi list, I have home made program, which uses File Alteration Monitor library to watch samba log files for new file creation in samba share directory. This technique works fine when I use GNU/Linux machine as client and it fails when I use Windows machine as client. The cause of failure is, samba server creates different pattern of logs and sometimes it does not create log entries on new file

I am trying to create a messaging system for my users but I''m having a hard time designing my db. This is what i have in mind, but I am not sure if its the best approach. user has_one inbox user has_one outbox inbox has_many messages outbox has_many messages inbox table user_id outbox table user_id messages table box_id (refers to either inbox or outbox - how?) from_id to_id

Dovecot-2.2.1's imap processes crash reliably when they use an IMAP URL with an invalid access specifier. A backtrace and some debug output follows. The crash is likely caused by imap_urlauth_fetch_parsed() returning 0 without having set *mpurl_r to NULL, and then imap_urlauth_fetch_local() freeing an uninitialized pointer. Exception Type: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV) Exception Codes:

Hi Dovecot People, i have switched my system from courier-imap to dovecot and iam quite happy with it, the performance is well and i had nearly no problems. One little feature iam missing is in Courier i had a folder called "Outbox" there i could paste mails which i want to sent out. In some networks its not always available to sent mails via port 21, i know i could just set up my

Hello Aki, Thank you for getting back. I tried your suggestion, but nope... I also checked the perms on dirss/files to be vmail rw(x)------ ; yet does not changed the beahaviour :( On 05/26/2017 12:29 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > You probably want to set subscriptions=no, so they will be done in the > parent namespace instead. > > Aki > > > On 26.05.2017 13:22, dovecot at

Hello Community, I am trying to figure out hwo to use the virtual mailboxes, but remain a bit confused: - I see the Virtual speudo-folder - Eventuelly the name of the boxes underneath - But cannot see more, nor subscrie to the virtual mailboxes Dovecot: # 2.2.29.1 (e0b76e3): /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.18 (29cc74d) # OS: Linux 4.4.50-v7+ armv7l Debian 8.0 ext4

Hello Community, I am facing the following question: how is it possible to share malboxes between domains? Example: - 2 domains present on the same dovecot: domA and domB - userA at domA - userB at domB userA at domA wants to share his mailbox to userB at domB (again same server)? Thank you for your help. Greetz

Hi Does anyone know of any R routines to send emails from R, under Windows? I thought about writing such a facility using the R(D)COM package to drive e.g. MS Outlook, but I don't want to reinvent the wheel. I have found a function Sys.mail in the library syskern, but this only works under Unix by shelling out a mail command. Thanks, David

Hi Does anyone know of any R routines to send emails from R, under Windows? I thought about writing such a facility using the R(D)COM package to drive e.g. MS Outlook, but I don't want to reinvent the wheel. I have found a function Sys.mail in the library syskern, but this only works under Unix by shelling out a mail command. Thanks, David