similar to: mbox vs maildir

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "mbox vs maildir"

2010 Feb 17
3
2nd REPOST: mbox vs maildir
I'm going to assume this is just not possible, or that no one has an answer, which would lead me back to uw-imap since it does work as-is. So I'll post it again, hoping that there is a solution for this setup and that folks have just been too busy to help think about it and/or help come up with a possible solution. ----- Ignoring my previous message just for a second, I realized
2010 Feb 12
0
REPOST: mbox vs maildir
Ignoring my previous message just for a second, I realized that my config wasn't correct. First the layout: ~mail/ ~mail/Drafts ~mail/Ashley-Feb09 ~mail/Others-Feb09 ~mail-Archives/ ~mail-Archives/2009/ ~mail-Archives/2009/Ashley/ ~mail-Archives/2009/Ashley/Ashley-Dec09 ~mail-Archives/2009/Ashley/Ashley-Nov09 ~mail-Archives/2009/Ashley/Ashley-Oct09 So I (now) have this for
2009 Aug 24
3
Per user namespace
I'm in the process of upgrading an old server which is running uw-imap to a new one running Dovecot. With the old machine, unfortunately, my users had the opportunity to store their e-mails in various locations. For example, some have their mail boxes stored in ~/mail/[various mbox files], others ALSO have a ~/mail/clients/[various mbox files] and yet others simply stored them in their
2015 Feb 26
2
Kickstart with multiple eth devices
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 13:42:57 -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner <ashley at pcraft.com> wrote: > And after picking this back up this morning .... still no dice. I have > now > blacklisted the one module that would enumerate the add-in ethernet port > so > that is no longer an issue during the kickstart process, however the > following is now happening: > > - kickstart
2015 Feb 26
0
Kickstart with multiple eth devices
Nope, it doesn't add it to the kernel boot parameters. That was the first thing I checked. As for the bootproto ... DUH. I didn't check that. :) That being solved, yeah it's not bringing up the add-in card now when it boots up. On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Jason Warr <jason at warr.net> wrote: > > > On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 13:42:57 -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner
2007 Apr 12
2
Updates?
I just installed CentOS 4 on a new server and now I'm looking for updates that have been released. I like to keep a local mirror of all the updates so I can apply them to other machines easier/faster (this of course assuming I end up installing CentOS on more servers.) So, where are those updates mirrored? With RH/FC, I can hit any mirror and rsync the updates folders. Is there an
2008 Mar 05
4
5.0 -> 5.1
Hi folks, I have a production server that's currently running 5.0 with all updates. What's the easiest, or perhaps best way to upgrade it to 5.1, with minimal down time? The downtime is critical, so I need to have it be a short as possible. I can live with an hour or two, but larger is going to be a pain. Suggestions? -- W | It's not a bug - it's an undocumented
2007 Apr 15
2
Weird time(zone)?
I installed CentOS 5 on a server today (wiping clean the drive which had 4.4 on it). During installation I picked the correct timezone, location and all. Yet, upon booting the machine, it seems to think that it's 6 hours earlier than it really is. The BIOS has the correct time and date on it. /etc/locatime was originally what /usr/share/zoneinfo/America/Denver would've
2007 Apr 09
1
UPS question
Hello folks, I'm about to install Centos on a new server and this will be my first "exposure" if you will to Centos. I come from an RH/Fedora background. Anyway, is there a list somewhere that will tell me what UPS batteries are compatible with Centos 4 (brand/model)? I figured before I go out and buy something I better check to see what's supported. Thanks.
2015 Feb 25
2
Kickstart with multiple eth devices
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:45:04 -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner <ashley at pcraft.com> wrote: > Out of order meaning, it puts the additional ethernet card as eth0, with > the built-in ports as eth1 and eth2 respectively. WITHOUT the additional > card >installed, it puts the built-in ports as eth0 and eth1, which is > what I want it to do. The additional card should be eth2, at
2015 Feb 25
4
Kickstart with multiple eth devices
Define out of order in this case just so I know for sure what you mean. What my solution does, or at least does reliably in my case, is make sure the interfaces are in the same order once installed as the install kernel saw them. It won't re-order them to be sequential based on bus, mac or driver. I am working on that but it will also include naming the devices based on the module
2015 Feb 25
4
Kickstart with multiple eth devices
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:11:02 -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner <ashley at pcraft.com> wrote: > Add "rdblacklist=MODULE_NAME" to your append line in pxelinux.conf file. >> > > Trying that next. It'll have to wait till tomorrow as we're under a > serious > blizzard/snow event right now and I'd like to get home before all of hell > freezes over.
2015 Jun 17
2
AutoFS mystery ...
Care to explain those two. direct versus indirect mapping? On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Ashley M. Kirchner <ashley at pcraft.com> > wrote: > > Nope, that completely takes over '/mnt' and everything else that's in > there > > becomes invisible. However, I do believe
2015 May 15
0
Back to eth shuffling ...
another identical machine will have the same bus ids. that's why this works. Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson GPG: C9A02289 Head of Technology (m) +61 (0) 4 2573 0382 DealMax Pty Ltd GitHub: @tartansandal Suite 1416 401 Docklands Drive Docklands VIC 3008 Australia "All parts should go together without forcing. You must
2015 Jun 17
2
AutoFS mystery ...
Nope, that completely takes over '/mnt' and everything else that's in there becomes invisible. However, I do believe you're on to something here. Looking back at the other, working setup, I do realize now that I did the same, where the path was '/mnt/<something>' and the autofs mounts are within that, so they became '/mnt/<something>/<mount-point>'
2015 May 15
2
Back to eth shuffling ...
Right, I understand that part. However I believe I'm now in the realm of making this specific to this machine as I have no guarantee that another identical machine will pop up with those same bus IDs. Maybe for the internal ports, but I don't know if the same will happen for the PCIe bus. Would that be correct? On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Kahlil Hodgson < kahlil.hodgson at
2006 Jan 05
0
Re: Question on Belkin UPS
Hi Ashley, yes, try the newhidups driver. It should work. If there are problems, we can improve the driver. -- Peter P.S. please keep the mailing list cc'd. Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > > Eric S. Johansson wrote: > > >> The software that Belkin includes is the "Bulldog" software. They do > >> offer a Linux version, but it is not included on the CD that
2015 Feb 26
0
Kickstart with multiple eth devices
And after picking this back up this morning .... still no dice. I have now blacklisted the one module that would enumerate the add-in ethernet port so that is no longer an issue during the kickstart process, however the following is now happening: - kickstart completes successfully using the machine's physical port 2 (or eth1) which is on a subnet with DHCP - when the system reboots, it
2004 Aug 13
0
Re: Problems with Mac files - Any resolution?
Hi Ashley, I don't think I have an answer for you, but I had a similar experience. We had a 2000 server set up that was sharing files to macs. I decided to rsync back it up to a more normal environment(*nix). I had all kinds of problems. I tried mounting the share via smb as you are trying. I tried cygwin/rsync on the 2000 machine, still had problems, though I think they were fewer,
2015 Feb 25
0
Kickstart with multiple eth devices
Out of order meaning, it puts the additional ethernet card as eth0, with the built-in ports as eth1 and eth2 respectively. WITHOUT the additional card installed, it puts the built-in ports as eth0 and eth1, which is what I want it to do. The additional card should be eth2, at least that's what I want it to do. Looking at persistent-net.rules, it always puts the additional card first, both