similar to: Automatic Debian Dovecot repository now also includes amd64 binary packages.

Hello, after I have done a dist-upgrade to Squeeze, I got some nasty problem with my dovecot. When I try to establish a connection via IMAP, it doesn't react and writes the following into my logfile: 2011-02-16 15:23:49 imap-login: Info: Login: user=<thomas at XXX>, method=PLAIN, rip=84.130.16.134, lip=XX.XXX.XX.XXX, TLS 2011-02-16 14:23:49 dovecot: Fatal:

Hi list, I get these warnings quite frequently. Warning: Failed to do incremental sync for mailbox INBOX, retry with a full sync Is this something to worry about? Otherwise the replication works perfectly. Cheers Jan -- MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT fuer Radioastronomie Jan Behrend - Rechenzentrum ---------------------------------------- Auf dem Huegel 69, D-53121 Bonn

Hi there, I'm using Dovecot together with Postfix; as I understand it, there are two ways to transfer the mail from Postfix to Dovecot. 1.) by using LDA with mailbox_command = /usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -f "$SENDER" -a "$RECIPIENT" 2.) by using LMTP with mailbox_transport = lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp (currently using number 1) I'm interessted in the

Hello list, I have a replicated dovecot with two servers. People seem to get vacation responses more often then it is specified in "days: XX", depending on which dovecot instance they receive the incoming mail. Is ".dovecot.lda-dupes" replicated? The other problem is that the vacation response is coming from the wrong address depending on which field the recipient was

Dearest list, I am using dovecot with heartbeat-2 and I noticed that the init scripts in the Debian packages from http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/ do not conform to the LSB standard: http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.1.1/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/iniscrptact.html E.g. the return code for "program is not running" is not 3. Is there is special reason for this? Cheers Jan --

Dearest list, just now I migrated a pine user to dovecot. Nothing special so far, but then I saw this in my syslog and the user reported, that he got this error message: MAIL FOLDER "INBOX" CLOSED DUE TO ACCESS ERROR Obviously this problem is related to his local filter rules: If commented out everything works like a charm. The corresponding filter rule looks for a

Am 2016-03-04 um 21:03 schrieb Stephan Bosch: > Op 3/4/2016 om 7:15 PM schreef Peter Chiochetti: >> Since dovecot put up packages on their own repo, bigmichi stopped >> providing his'. I guess this is not Stephan; Would the kind person >> update ppa.launchpad.net/bigmichi1 ? > > The Xi packages are built for Ubuntu here: > >

Since dovecot put up packages on their own repo, bigmichi stopped providing his'. I guess this is not Stephan; Would the kind person update ppa.launchpad.net/bigmichi1 ? Thank You -- peter

On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:18:51 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > Thanks for bringing the question over from StackOverflow [1]. I am not > very impressed that you STILL hide behind a pseudonym and I am starting > to question my sanity as to why I take time out to help someone like > that. Anyway, read on ... > > [1]

Dear all, I am trying to use multiple version of R unpacked from CRAN deb files. It does work successfully, except for some packages installation, whether Rscript has been used. I have configured alternatives and switch R environments without any problem and can install most of the packages. '====================================================== $ update-alternatives --display R R - auto

Hi, For our testing enthusiasts I've created new automatic Debian repositories for Dovecot v2.2. Repositories are available for Debian oldstable, stable and testing, on both i386 and am64. Read the following wiki item for more information: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/PrebuiltBinaries#Automatically_Built_Packages The repository for Dovecot v1.2 has been defunct for a few months now and is

Am 07.05.2015 um 01:45 schrieb Santiago Vila: > On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 12:02:12AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> Thanks, fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/94bd895721d8 > > Unfortunately, I applied single changeset 94bd895721d8 over Debian > version 2.2.16-1 to create an updated Debian package and I can still > reproduce the problem when using the updated package.

Hi all, I am using WINE that I compiled in a 32bit chroot environment in 64bit Archlinux. Following the guide located at: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Install_bundled_32-bit_system_in_Arch64 I created the chroot environment, installed 32bit versions of the WINE dependencies, and accessed WINE in the 32bit chroot from the 64bit environment with schroot. Everything works well except when I

List, good evening, just installed a new Debian Stable (Wheezy). The Debian Stable repositories now include Dovecot 2.1.7 as standard. I haven't installed that because I wanted to try 2.2.x on this new clean install but unsure which 'pool' to use in the xi.rename-it.nl repository of autobuilds. http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/pool/ Wheezy became Stable on May 5, just a few days

Hi, I have the x86_64 arch on my server so therfore i expect that yum updates only x86_64 packages. With the last *yum update* i?ve noticed a strange behaviour while retrieving the needed packeges. As you you see, yum wants install packages for different architectures: glibc x86_64 2.3.4-2.25 base 4.9 M glibc i686 2.3.4-2.25 base 5.1 M . .

Dear List: I'm having the same problem that was reported recently. The latest version of R cannot load the Matrix package, even though it is installed and readable. I've read the archive files for this list and tried the suggested solutions (e.g., removing/uninstalling the Matrix package and reinstalling it). Nothing has worked so far. Does anybody have advice of what I could try next?

Dear Ubunutu R users, Vincent Goulet and myself would like to announce the availability of R 2.11.0 for Ubuntu's latest release, Lucid Lynx. The packages should be on or arriving soon to your favorite mirror. R 2.11.0 packages also exist on CRAN for all Ubuntu releases going back to hardy. As Johannes Ranke pointed out for the Debian release, R packages installed under R < 2.10.0

Hello, I was following the instructions at https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu/#secure-apt but encountered this message upon apt-get update: GPG error: http://cran.rstudio.com trusty/ Release: The following signatures were invalid: KEYEXPIRED... And then the following on apt-get install: WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! Investigating a little, it looks like

-----Original Message----- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Rainer Duffner Sent: Samstag, 21. Oktober 2017 00:41 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] scp setup jailed chroot on Centos7 > Am 20.10.2017 um 15:58 schrieb Adrian Jenzer <a.jenzer at herzogdemeuron.com>: > > Dear all > > I'm looking for instructions on how to setup a

On 20 May 2018 at 09:34, Robin Lovelace wrote: | Thanks for keeping us updated. Before I jump the gun and put this out on | social media (as a follow-up to this tweet | https://twitter.com/robinlovelace/status/990682038373158912 ), would you | say this is a reasonable message to send to the R-using Ubuntu community?: Why don't we just wait until Michael feels he has something to announce?