similar to: Dovecot design-question

Hi All, I currently have a small Dovecot server (Server A) and I've installed a second dovecot mailbox server (server B) and am trying to sync mailboxes from Server A to Server B. Both servers sit behind two dovecot directors on separate hosts and have identical config files (doveconf -n output below). Mailboxes on Server A are on an NFS mount. Server A has been working fine with no

Hi Anyone know of there is an rpm available for this? Trying to build a loadbalancer from the LVS project for a webserver farm and struggling with ipvsadm <http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/software/kernel-2.6/ipvsadm-1.24-6.src.rpm> on 4.2 thanks

Can dovecot-1.1 deliver work with static userdb? I'm currently running dovecot-1.0.12 and postfix-2.4.6, with virtual users' maildirs all owned by vmail and mail_location = maildir:/var/mail/%Lu. The following definition of the dovecot transport in postfix/master.conf works fine with dovecot-1.0: dovecot unix - n n - 1 pipe flags=DRh

Hi all! I am a long time lurker, but have not posted until now. My old trusted firewall machine broke a couple of weeks ago and I replaced it with a XEN domU that is using DNAT and has two interfaces. The firewall domU and the FTP server domU are both guests on the same dom0. All three machines are running Debian/etch (stable) and Shorewall has version 3.2.6. I can''t get FTP to work

Hi! I'm using dovecot for a while now and really like it. Actually dovecot 1.5 on Debian AMD64. Now I have to use a cifs mounted maildir directory and found it to be quite slow, though I already tuned it a lot. The only way to get it fast was to put INDEX and CONTROL files on the local disc and so outside of the maildirs. Performance is great but the problem is with submissions to

Hi, I have question i have loadbalancer that's connects every x seconds to my pop3 and Imap to see if it's still working. Every time it connects I see its ip is there a way to say don't log ip x.x.x.x ? With kind regards, Bas van den Dikkenberg -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Dear All, Currently we are running a mail system for 10000 users each 2GB mailbox. At present we have 5 mail servers where users mailboxes are distributed almost uniformly. We have a HP SAN Storage (HP EVA 6400) where mailboxes are stored. We partition the storage into five vg and each is mounted on the 5 servers. We are using postfix and dovecot. The system was running fine but currently we

Hello, I have finished setting up the load balancer with IPROUTE ... also patch the kernel to support DGD and now it''s working fine with the valuable guide at LARTC website, Julian Anastasov, and the kind people in this mailing list. Now I would like to launch a web server and a ftp server to the public but I''m stuck into a problem and really need your help. Currently internal

Hello Mongrels, Building on the last messages about Fastthread, can we get a detailed survey of the different ways people are deploying their applications? It will help with near-future Mongrel development. Please include the following things: * Framework, if any (Camping, Merb, Rails, Nitro, Ramaze, IOWA, Rack...) * Mongrel version * Mongrel handlers used (rails, dirhandler, camping,

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 08:50:16PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote: > you should avoid this > one solution is to use loadbalancers with persistance We had been using a loadbalancer with persistence to reduce the problems, and today I switched to everything running on a single box to avoid any cross-node contention. Unfortunately, the problem still happens, even when they were all running

Hi, I've been running dovecot for many years, but now i've hit a strange problem. when retrieving imap there is sometimes in 1 of 4 imap requests a 4sec latency. * notes: - connected directly to the backends this latency disappears - removing a director from the loadbalancer(lvs) so i'm the only connected to the director this latency disappears too I would appreciate some feedback

Hello fellow samba users, Our company uses samba for all fileshares/printing/PDC on two SUN E3500's. We like to replace these with about 10 Linux 19" XEON (pizza)boxes. The question: Are there any implementation out there using a loadbalancing cluster doing samba? A simple diagram of the setup I have in mind: Users (+/- 500) ||| Headnode(Director 1) - Headnode (Director 2) | Worknode -

Hi all, i''m having a somewhat stupid problem I can''t get rid of. we''ve a server that accepts incoming world connections from a load balancer (10.10.10.4) to port 80, and we still want to serve incoming ssh/http from the firewall (10.10.10.1) routed to this host (10.10.10.90) and their reply packets of cause shall be send out through the firewall. unfortunately, both

I've stopped trying to find a HowTo that suits me right away, and instead I am happily trudging thru the Dovecot wiki, article by article. I have right up front thought of one question, a general one, and some detailed versions of that same question: Generally, is there much general performance and reliability background data available for making the basic choices? Say: 1st. delivery:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1736 Bug ID: 1736 Summary: nftables - dynamic update for verdict map from the packet path Product: nftables Version: 1.0.x Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft

But is that not adviced in the manual[1]? I am also in the process of setting up dovecot behind a haproxy. Still testing with this. I was wondering why one would choose haproxy and not eg dovecot proxy (with director) [1] https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HAProxy -----Original Message----- From: Zelic Bojan [mailto:bojan.zelic at kudelskisecurity.com] Sent: woensdag 26 augustus 2020 23:39 To:

Hi all, Can someone help me in creating a single bandwidth pipe out of two or more bandwidth providers. Say, I have 2 internet connections 1) 128 K 2) 128 K I want to use both of them on a single linux box. Is there any way to do so. Of course loadbalancing can be done, but I don''t want loadbalancing. I want to have a single pipe of 256 K. Some time back I was suggested to use squid on

Hi Friends I am facing an issue with dovecot configuration and i am describing it in a nutshell. We have a dovecot setup under ultramonkey load balancer and in loadbalancer we have a check defined for pop service which queries mysqldatabase for a particular user name/password after every 2 minutes to check if service is live or not.. Things are fine till here . Now The catch is if somehow that

On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:05:46 +0200 Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > On 20 Nov 2017, at 10.50, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> > > wrote: > > > > AFAIK no complex director stuff would be needed then, right? > > The second sentence implies that using file locking should also be enough, > > which dovecot does. >

Hello, The company that I work for will be developing a large webbased survey (for a government institution) somewhere in Q1/Q2 of 2006. I''m investigating the technological possibilities and Rails is certainly a candidate. The survey application will have to perform under very high peak load, and the exact specifications of the hardware are not known at this point. I''m assuming