similar to: Extraneous information

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Extraneous information"

2012 Mar 01
1
LIST-STATUS issue
Looked at the hg commits since 2.1.1, but didn't see anything that was exactly on-point to this... UNSEEN counts seem to be broken when done in a LIST-STATUS call. I see this, for example: >> Timestamp: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 10:55:47 -0700 [...] C: 3 LIST "" (INBOX IN.dovecot) RETURN (STATUS (UNSEEN)) S: * LIST () "." "IN.dovecot" S: * STATUS
2014 Jul 09
1
HIGHESTMODSEQ tracking
Hello, I'd like to follow up on someone else's old thread: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-April/082624.html I understand that Dovecot (that 2012 discussion was about version 2.0.18) can return "HIGHESTMODSEQ 1" upon SELECT if persistent modseq tracking was never enabled for a mailbox. I'd like to get a clarification on how to enable proper persistent modseq
2012 Apr 10
1
Bug in HIGHESTMODSEQ when MODSEQ tracking is not enabled for version 2.0.18.
Greetings, I'm new to the list. I have encountered what I believe to be a bug in the return of HIGHESTMODSEQ when talking to a IMAP client. HIGHESTMODSEQ does not appear to be incrementing when a new message arrives. The exact steps I took are: 1) Create a new mail account 2) Send a mail to the account, check that you can receive the email. Send a second mail to the account. 3) perform a
2009 Jul 29
4
Random flags appearing on messages
Not reproducible every time, but every so often, after viewing an unseen message, I am seeing the first non-system flag set on the message without an intervening STORE call. Here's an example: 2 EXAMINE "XXX" (QRESYNC (1165391112 78
2017 Apr 04
3
Problem with Dovecot and BlackBerry
Hi all, i've got a strange behaviour with a BlackBerry Classic Phone (BBOS 10.3.2.2876) in combination with Dovecot 2.2.13 while trying to fetch mails. Before burying myself into debugging sessions, i try to get an understanding if the following is a Client- or a Server-specific error in the behaviour: CIGA8 UID FETCH 10009:10035 (UID FLAGS) (CHANGEDSINCE NOMODSEQ) CIGA8 BAD Error
2013 Dec 20
2
v2.2.10 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.10.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.10.tar.gz.sig I've been really busy the last few months, as I guess people in Dovecot mailing list have seen since I haven't been very responsive. There are at least some dsync bugs I haven't had time to look into yet. The busyness probably continues for a while more, but the next year is
2013 Dec 20
2
v2.2.10 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.10.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.10.tar.gz.sig I've been really busy the last few months, as I guess people in Dovecot mailing list have seen since I haven't been very responsive. There are at least some dsync bugs I haven't had time to look into yet. The busyness probably continues for a while more, but the next year is
2012 Apr 23
8
v2.1.5 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.5.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.5.tar.gz.sig A few announcements first: I'm now going to start being more strict about not answering Dovecot questions sent to me privately (especially support requests, but also bug reports, feature requests, etc). Often those questions could be answered by other people in the mailing list as
2012 Apr 23
8
v2.1.5 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.5.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.5.tar.gz.sig A few announcements first: I'm now going to start being more strict about not answering Dovecot questions sent to me privately (especially support requests, but also bug reports, feature requests, etc). Often those questions could be answered by other people in the mailing list as
2020 Oct 09
3
HIGHESTMODSEQ replication issue
Hello, I'm using dovecot 2.3.10 in OpenSUSE and I have configured a master/master replication between two backends, it works well but I have found an issue with the replication of the HIGHESTMODSEQ. When I move a set of message from a mailbox to other, e.g. move 3 messages from INBOX to Junk, the HIGHESTMODSEQ get different on each server, with no errors in the log: [Borrador] 34:34
2015 Jul 19
1
RFC 5465 (NOTIFY) violation: missing HIGHESTMODSEQ in initial STATUS responses
Quoting RFC 5465 (NOTIFY): ?If the NOTIFY command enables MessageNew, MessageExpunge, AnnotationChange, or FlagChange notifications for a mailbox other than the currently selected mailbox, and the client has specified the STATUS indicator parameter, then the server MUST send a STATUS response for that mailbox before NOTIFY's tagged OK. [?] If either AnnotationChange or
2008 Mar 13
2
CONDSTORE + QRESYNC extensions
I wrote a mostly-working CONDSTORE support for Dovecot today. You can try it with: hg clone http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-condstore/ There are a few problems left: - STORE FLAGS.SILENT should be sending FETCH MODSEQ updates - When SELECTing a mailbox while CONDSTORE hasn't yet been enabled in the session, Dovecot returns a higher HIGHESTMODSEQ than what's used after CONDSTORE is
2016 Dec 05
4
Simple way to get mailbox size by folder.
On 12/3/2016 2:53 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > >> On December 3, 2016 at 11:16 PM Vijay Sarvepalli <vijay at ericavijay.net> wrote: >> >> >> Is there a simple way to get each mailbox size using dovecot's IMAP >> interface? The GETQUOTAROOT and GETQUOTA seems to work with the full >> maildir size and not the individual folders. >> >> I am
2016 Feb 24
3
search problem dovecot 2.2.21 + fts - Solr
Hello, Realized update dovecot on my server. Now the search is returning differently from the previous version bringing reference information of other messages . For example when doing a search for anderson.joao this new version of the dovecot dovecot 2.2.21 + fts - Solr response will be all email that has the word anderson and joao, instead of returning only items with the word anderson.joao.
2013 May 06
2
Keyword limit?
Running into a weird issue in a mailbox that has 26+ keywords. In one session, I do this: S: 2 SELECT "INBOX" (QRESYNC (1255685337 78608 [...uids...])) S: [...] S: * OK [HIGHESTMODSEQ 78608] Highest S: * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1255685337] UIDs valid S: 2 OK [READ-WRITE] Select completed. C: 3 UID STORE 48386 (UNCHANGEDSINCE 78608) +FLAGS AAAAAAAA S: * 8 FETCH (UID 48386 MODSEQ (78609) FLAGS
2020 Feb 06
2
doveadm backup -R -m -s not picking up a new message
Good morning, I use ?doveadm backup -R -m foo -s $state? to create a local mirror of an imapc remote folder. When I run that command, wait for it to finish, deliver a new message to the remote folder, and run that command again, the new message does not get downloaded from the remote. I'll attach the rawlog, doveconf, etc at the end. Allow me first to summarize what I've already
2012 Nov 05
2
Issues with VANISHED CHANGEDSINCE
I've been seeing the following wonky behavior with Dovecot. Currently this is with Dovecot 2.0.19, but I was also seeing it in earlier versions as well, including versions from the 1.x series. Some background, this is from Horde's ActiveSync library, when it is trying to determine what UIDs have recently been expunged. I can guarantee that when this command was sent, there was
2018 Jul 26
2
mdbox_deleted proper syntax
hello, on the wiki, https://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox, it says that one can use either doveadm fetch or doveadm import, however I can find no correct syntax with fetch that'll actually work. Is the idea to simply override the mail_location with -o ? That seems to work for doveadm mailbox but not for doveadm fetch or search # doveadm -f table mailbox status -u johan all dovecot
2018 Feb 23
2
Assertion during dsync receive
Thanks. I've had the user clear out that mailbox, and replication is working fine for them again. Is there a better way to catch this than watch for crashes and read the backtrace to find what mailbox needs to be shrunk? Where is the threshold for "too big"? -- Ian On 2/23/18 11:33 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > The mailbox is too big. > > > > --- > Aki Tuomi >
2019 Jul 16
2
Unexpected result from LIST EXTENDED command
I am executing this command below to dovecot-2.3.5-6.cp1178.x86_64 server Notice that some status responses are missing (For folders INBOX.Archive, INBOX.spam.&-BD0EOQQ9BDkEPQ-). I wonder If this is a bug or working as expected In rfc5819 there is this: If the server runs into unexpected problems while trying to look up the STATUS information, it MAY drop the corresponding STATUS reply. In