similar to: Inotify instance limit for user exceeded

Hello, is possible in some way use on each ip address different certificate (for imap, for pop3). There are options like (but that is not enough for me): protocol imap { listen = *:10143 ssl_listen = *:10943 .. } protocol pop3 { listen = *:10100 .. } I have server for 4 domains (each has own ip address), so i need bind one ip address to one domain to one certificate(each certificate

Hello, after qmail migration need convert some .procmailrc scripts. Found converter procmail -> sieve, but i'm not sure of quality of conversion. My script: --------------- if header :contains "from" ["user at domain1.tld", "user2 at domain2.tld", "user3 at domain3.tld"] { redirect "foo1 at bar.tld"; redirect "foo2 at

Hello, using dovecot with postfix with mysql. Some domains have alias. Local delivery is realized over lmtp. When lmtp delivery to aliased domains, it takes bad mail_location - it takes aliased instead real domain, so lmtp is creating domain and user directory. Lmtp doesn't make sql lookup. I need lmtp delivery to real domain and i don't want to create symlinks. mail_location =

Hi. What does the warning "Inotify instance limit for user exceeded, disabling." mean, and how do I get rid of it? I assume that I have to change a limit somewhere? Regards, Anders.

>From my log: Aug 10 12:23:39 postamt dovecot: IMAP(megow): Inotify instance limit for user exceeded, disabling. Increase /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_instances # wc -l subscriptions 95 # cat /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_instances 128 Why does 95 exceed 128? -- Ralf Hildebrandt Gesch?ftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charit? - Universit?tsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin

I'm seeing this message in my /var/log/maillog: May 26 12:35:00 agencymail dovecot: IMAP(info at example.com): Inotify instance limit for user exceeded, disabling. Increase /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_instances I rummaged through google, and found : http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot-cvs/2008-May/011132.html which says I need to increase /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_instances (no

Hello, i'm trying to do some delivery notification for each incoming address. Problem is that sieve vacation has :days but minimum value is 1 eg period in which addresses are kept and are not responded to - but that is not that i want. Is there other extension (in devel ???) or some other way (lda using procmail or maildrop) how to implement my request ? (Before migration we used qmail +

Hi System debian 8.11 dovecot-2.2.36.4 and I have some warnings in log likes: Warning: Inotify watch limit for user exceeded, disabling. Increase /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_watches cat /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_watches 8192 in sysctl i change #fs.inotify.max_user_watches= 8192 #fs.inotify.max_user_instances = 16384 fs.inotify.max_user_watches= 16384 fs.inotify.max_user_instances =

Hello, scenario: OK 1. created vacation script (see below) OK 2. send message from user at anotherdomain.tld to user at domain.tld => got auto vacation response (2010-02-11T19:42:13) OK 3. send message from user at anotherdomain.tld to user at domain.tld => no response (is ok because ":days 1" settings) (2010-02-11T19:47:46) BAD 4. send message from anotheruser at

Hello, I've a problem on my system with inotify. In the smbd logfile are shown a lot messages like this: [2015/06/10 11:15:21.644453, 0, pid=57030, effective(12700, 100), real(0, 0)] smbd/notify_inotify.c:297(inotify_setup) Failed to init inotify - Too many open files [2015/06/10 11:15:23.968497, 0, pid=57030, effective(12700, 100), real(0, 0)] smbd/notify_inotify.c:297(inotify_setup)

Maybe I have multiple problems - dunno. I've started seeing the following log lines: Mar 7 07:46:22 bubba dovecot: imap(dmiller at amfes.com): Warning: Inotify instance limit for user 5000 (UID vmail) exceeded, disabling. Increase /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_instances max_user_instances is currently 128. I've tried stopping and restarting dovecot - the message immediately returns.

Hello, Timo, last year when you remoted into our server and performed the migration from courier-imap, we ran into this issue, and you solved it by doing: echo 1024 > /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_instances Then you said you were going to solve this permanently by changing the init script... Here is what you said (this is from the skype chat): [2012-06-04 10:40:43 AM] timosirainen:

Hi I allready have set 256 on max_user_instances , and in the log i keep seeing Mar 28 10:08:44 mail dovecot: imap(some.username): Warning: Inotify instance limit for user 98 (UID vmail) exceeded, disabling. Increase /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_instances All users use thunderbird 3.1.9 , and from time to time this show in log , with a random user. What can i do to resolve this issue ? my

Hello, is there some way how to disable temporarily account or access to files. I need to backup with tar, but there is problem when tar is reading and some file changed (with --ignore-failed-read it continues but archive is not created and without --ignore-failed-read it fails). Some accounts are huge ;( Need something like qmail sticky bit or world writable directory - qmail is not delivering

(dovecot v1.2.16) I've notice the log notices about increasing /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_instances on my servers, and started wondering if inotify works for network/cluster filesystems.. I found this: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=311194 which says that there's no mechanism for one node to tell another node that a directory changed for GPFS.. And I

Hello, seems that LDA ignores deliver_log_format (still log with format: "msgid=%m: %$") # 1.2.6: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.31 x86_64 Debian squeeze/sid xfs log_path: /var/log/dovecot/error.log info_log_path: /var/log/dovecot/info.log log_timestamp: %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S protocols: none listen: none disable_plaintext_auth: no login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login

Am 14.09.2016 um 18:23 schrieb Michael A Weber: > >> On Sep 14, 2016, at 10:44 AM, Achim Gottinger via samba >> <samba at lists.samba.org <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>> wrote: >> >> >> >> Am 14.09.2016 um 05:53 schrieb Michael A Weber via samba: >>> Experts— >>> >>> I’m attempting to export a keytab for a created

> On Sep 14, 2016, at 12:57 PM, Achim Gottinger <achim at ag-web.biz> wrote: > > > > Am 14.09.2016 um 18:23 schrieb Michael A Weber: >> >>> On Sep 14, 2016, at 10:44 AM, Achim Gottinger via samba <samba at lists.samba.org <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 14.09.2016 um 05:53

Consider this topology domain1-server1 domain2-server2 | | laptop - domain1-server1 ---- domain2-server1 Laptop has two ssh identities, domain1 and domain2. I don't wish to store identity locally in any of the servers. As far as I understand, there isn't any way to limit ssh-agent to allow only signing

Hi, I have been trying to use Winbindd in SLES 11 SP3 (Samba version 3.6.3-17.25.1) to fetch AD (Windows 2008 R2) identities into the Linux box and currently running into some problem w.r.t domain local groups and thought I could get some help here.. I have a two domain setup, in which DOMAIN1 is the parent domain and DOMAIN2 is the child domain. I have 2 users DOMAIN1\user1, DOMAIN2\user2 and