similar to: strange behaviour with seen/unseen messages in virtual folders.

Hallo all, I have the following glm model: f1 <- as.formula(paste("factor(y.fondi)~", "flgsess + segmeta2 + udm + zona.geo + ultimo.prod.", "+flg.a2 + flg.d.na2 + flg.v2 + flg.cc2", " +(flg.a1 + flg.d.na1 + flg.v1 + flg.cc1)^2", " + flg.a2:flg.d.na2 + flg.a2:flg.v2 +

Hello! I am really need help! I am using dovecot installation on ~700 users with dspam integration via dovecot-antispam plugin. Problem in unpredictable result of moving spam-mails from INBOX to Junk and from Junk to INBOX. In some cases it works fine, but sometimes I see error like "It's not possible to move the message" in client (roundcube). Two different samples on same

G'day, I am just getting into rsync and have been very impressed with performance and reliability. There is one thing I haven't worked out how to do yet and I haven't found much with several Google sessions or by way of consulting the examples. I am looking for a way to check for (or duplicate) single flag files to and from a remote host (without any dummy spit errors when it is not

I've having problems with a BT 2 span ISDN-30/Digium TE205P asterisk setup with outgoing calls not completing and requiring an Asterisk reset to 'unstick' span 1. Sorry this is a bit long but I'm completely out of my depth :-( This system has been in use for some while and I recently upgraded it to asterisk 1.4.24, zaptel 1.4.11 and libpri 1.4.9. I didn't change

Hi, when I add a collection in Alpine, Apline verifies the existence of the added folder/namespace, like for instance adding 'common.': 0a LIST "common." "" 0b LIST "" common Common is a shared folder. Some folder are available under that namespace. With list=yes Alpine can add the collection, with list=children it's not possible. Alpine thinks that

Hello, I am currently switching to ldd from ld.bfd on a cross-platform embedded project and am facing a behaviour difference when using the same linker scripts with ld.bfd and ldd. Could anybody please give me a more reliable direction I should go with to get the same behaviour from both of the linkers? Target binary format is a 32-bit ELF executable, which is expected to consist of a single RWX

I am linking a program to be loaded in an ARM Cortex-M0+ based microcontroller. In the linker script, I have a section allocated for the stack which roughly looks like the following. .stack : { . += __stack_size__; } > ram Using the linker in the gcc arm toolchain, arm-none-eabi-ld, this section is automatically set to type NOBITS, however, when linking with version 10.0.0 of ld.lld, the

Hi, while syncing dsync crashed: dsync-local(matthias): Panic: dsync brain state=10 dsync-local(matthias): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0 [0xf7eed541] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(default_fatal_handler+0x4e) [0xf7eed66e] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(i_error+0) [0xf7eed878] -> dsync [0x804e106] -> dsync [0x80539b7] ->

Thanks James it seems worked for me :) I am facing some issues in login into bugs.llvm.org, I will file once I get access. Pls feel free if you have login :) Thank you again. From: James Henderson <jh7370.2008 at my.bristol.ac.uk> Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 1:58 PM To: Oza, Hiral <Hiral.Oza at netapp.com> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] llvm-objdump print

Hello: I have a host running two KVM guests. The guests use br0 and each has a static IP address. I am trying to figure out if there is a way to use snmpd on the host to measure the traffic usage of the guests. I do not want to require anything running on the guests since I do not control them. Looking at netstat -in on the host, I see this info: Kernel Interface table Iface MTU Met

Hi, I now this is kinda impolite to ask, but I would like some feedback on this issue. I'm representing the Mailu user group here, plus the fact that my own production server is affected and starts to crash due to file corruption as a result of the indexer-worker segfaults. Last night my server became unavailable with logs like: Error: imap(tim at

Hello! I have set up tunnel between a FreeBSD machine and Windows Vista. Tunnel is established, but when I try to ping either end ping fails. I have temporarily switched off firewalls on both machines, no luck. Here is client tinc.conf on Vista: Name = lenovo_client ConnectTo = lenovo_server Interface = tinctap Subnet = 10.20.40.0/24 Sevrer tinc.conf on FreeBSD: Device=/dev/tap0

Hi list, this question is related to the IMAP protocol itself, not really to Dovecot. I'm trying to understand what is the more efficient way to maintain the number of unseen messages of the currently selected mailbox. RFC3501 says a client must not issue a STATUS command to the selected mailbox and that information sent by a SELECT is enough. My current idea follows these steps : * Issue a

> On 2 Oct 2019, at 17.01, John Stoffel <john at stoffel.org <mailto:john at stoffel.org>> wrote: > To look at all the mailboxes on the server and see how many RECENT > mails there are. For the postfix-users list, I see that there are 6 > recent messages. And if I do the list of mailboxes command again, it > returns the same count. Then if I go and look at the

Ok, thanks a lot for the reply. I'll keep digging then :) On 12/21/18 4:19 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 21.12.2018 15.01, Tim Mohlmann via dovecot wrote: >> Hi, I now this is kinda impolite to ask, but I would like some feedback >> on this issue. I'm representing the Mailu user group here, plus the fact >> that my own production server is affected and starts to crash due

On 21.12.2018 15.01, Tim Mohlmann via dovecot wrote: > Hi, I now this is kinda impolite to ask, but I would like some feedback > on this issue. I'm representing the Mailu user group here, plus the fact > that my own production server is affected and starts to crash due to > file corruption as a result of the indexer-worker segfaults. Last night > my server became unavailable

> On 23 Dec 2019, at 11.57, Philip Colmer <philip.colmer at linaro.org> wrote: > > I'm trying to diagnose a really strange situation where certain emails, when submitted to the mailbox by Postfix, are not considered to be unseen by Dovecot. > > During testing, I've shut down anything else on the server that might want to access the mailbox. I submit the email to the

>>>>> "John" == John Stoffel via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> writes: >>>>> "Sami" == Sami Ketola via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> writes: >>> On 1 Oct 2019, at 21.45, John Stoffel via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've been

Hi, I've still asserts while accessing virtual folders: Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted. [New process 6714] #0 0xf7e57556 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6 #0 0xf7e57556 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #1 0xf7e58d78 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2 0x080f2eb5 in default_fatal_finish (type=<value optimized

I'm afraid I can't give steps to reproduce this, but if someone's come across something like this, it might help me figure out what's going on. I run imapfilter/offlineimap to fetch mail from a gmail to a local maildir store, which I then access with alpine via dovecot (1.2.15). Here's the output of dovecot -n: # 1.2.15: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 i686