similar to: Mail storage creation fails with virtual users

Machine is 4.8-STABLE smaug# camcontrol devlist <COMPAQ BD009122BA 3B07> at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,da0) <COMPAQ BD009122C6 B016> at scbus0 target 1 lun 0 (pass1,da1) <COMPAQ BD009122BA 3B07> at scbus0 target 2 lun 0 (pass2,da2) <COMPAQ BD00962373 BCJE> at scbus0 target 3 lun 0 (pass3,da3) <IBM IC35L018UCPR15-0 S70H>

Dovecot version 2.1.7 Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS Kernel 3.2.0-35-generic x86_64 I'm not sure exactly when this started occurring, but sporatically users report issues receiving email, having email saved to "Sent," etc. Looking in dovecot.log, I see the following errors: 2013-10-16 09:53:20 imap-login: Info: Login: user=<user1>, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, mpid=27434,

Hi, I'm Tachibana. Additionally, I found below: dovecot/src/plugins/fts/fts-build-mail.c: 187 i_debug("@@@@@ befor address parse:%s",hdr->full_value); 188 189 addr = message_address_parse(pool_datastack_create(), 190 hdr->full_value, 191

Hello all, I'm quite new as well to Dovecot, just installed it on a FreeBSD system with Postfix and Rspamd as side apps. Things are running semi-smoothly for all users but I do have quite a few errors in the logs : Oct 13 19:43:56 apollo dovecot[24478]: imap(user1)<34412><zIeI9ZCxXDmsFhZG>: Fatal: setgid(1030(user1) from userdb lookup) failed with euid=1022(user4),

Hi, Not sure if this is it, but I used to have the same error when I started with dovecot. Aki's response was the following (and solved my problem). ------------- Hi! You can't set service imap { service_count = 256 } if you are using multiple system UIDs. See https://wiki.dovecot.org/Services#imap.2C_pop3.2C_submission.2C_managesieve *service_count* can be changed from 1 if only a

Hello all, I have samba 3 with a share named shareA using these settings: [shareA] comment = Directory Amministrazione path = /col/shareA browseable = no valid users = @amm force group = amm public = no writable = yes create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 printable = no where user1, user2, user3 and user4 belong to "amm" group. I would like to

On 1/08/2016 10:01 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 7/31/2016 om 4:27 AM schreef Reuben Farrelly: >> Hi, >> >> I've observed some odd behaviour with dsync replication between two >> hosts, specifically to do with sieve script replication. >> Has anyone else experienced the replication problem? Are sieve >> scripts actually replicating in live time for

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 20:24:13 +0900, TACHIBANA Masashi wrote: > Hi, > > I'm Tachibana. > Additionally, I found below: > > dovecot/src/plugins/fts/fts-build-mail.c: > > 187 i_debug("@@@@@ befor address parse:%s",hdr->full_value); > 188 > 189 addr = message_address_parse(pool_datastack_create(), >

Ok, you are completely right. Here are the real numbers with changed user names: drwx------ 43 DOM\user1        DOM\domain-user  4096 Jan 10 08:00 user1 drwx------   5 DOM\user2        DOM\domain-user  4096 Jan 11 08:13 user2 drwx------ 92 DOM\user3        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jan 16 08:39 user3 drwx------   3        133265        DOM\domain-user   4096 Sep  7 2015 user4 drwx------   7       

Hi, This To field was not correct indexed by FTS. To: Yamada Taro <yamada at example.com>,=?UTF-8?B?dXNlcjJAZXhhbXBsZS5jb20=?= <user2 at example.com>, =?UTF-8?B?dXNlcjNAZXhhbXBsZS5jb20=?= <user3 at example.com>, user4 desu <user4 at example.com> --> Yamada Taro <yamada at example.com> , user2 at example.com And follow was correct indexed by FTS To: Yamada

I have a client with a linux server with samba installed and I've created users using the smbpasswd command (user1,user2,user3...) but when I go to the XP machines they can see the different shares but are unable to write to the folders or create additional folders based on their user1 and password. I want them to validate themselves to the linux server so that if their domain goes down they

All, I'm running the latest stable version of SerNet-Samba on a Debian Sarge box (I switched from the traditional Samba package for certain reasons which I won't delve into here), but I've come across a serious issue. Every day, the Samba processes become so numerous that the server begins acting really flaky. That is to say, there are so many smbd -D processes that the server

I've just joined the list and this is my first e-mail, I'm sure this has been answered many times. So if someone can direct me to the answer I would appreciate it. I have samba-2.2.7-3.7.2 installed on a RH7.3 server, not due for upgrade until later this year. I can get the windows 98 and windows 2000 PC to login, but cannot get the Windows XP PC to log in. I made the chages to the

Hi All, Just joined the list. The postings are very helpful for me to implementing samba for my work place. I am running samba 3.0.1 or RED HAT 9.0. Does anybody know how to add Windows domain users to a linux usergroup? My PDC is running Windows 2000. I do not have permissions to create groups on the Windows PDC. Windbind is working fine on the Redhat machine. I can map to the linux samba

I've spent some time updating, upgrading and generally consolidating an old Samba AD. I've managed to remove a very old unsupported (4.2) Samba AD DC following migration to a couple of new DC's - that seems to have worked out OK. Workstation logons and GPO's working fine. I'm now left with one problem after joining a new Samba (4.5.12) member server to the domain for file

Hi, I have an small network with SUSE 9.1 and trying to use samba. I was reading a lot of papers about samba, but i cannot do something i need. In my computer i have a directory named cotiza owned by user4(me) with the group users and mode 765. M users list there're user1, user2, user3 and user4 all of them with users group. In smb.conf have: [cotiza] comment = Directorio de Cotizaciones

Unfortunately, the the Ubuntu 18.04 samba-tool package doesn't have "user show" as an option. The Windows ADUC tool shows user1 uidNumber =10001, user2 uidNumber=10002, user3 uidNumber =10003, and user4 uidNumber=10004 Here are the getent command results on the file server/ domain member: *admin at fsvr0:~$ getent passwd user1* hq-user1:*:11103:10513::/home/lan/user1:/bin/bash

On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:54:17 +0100 Andreas Hauffe via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Ok, you are completely right. Here are the real numbers with changed > user names: > > drwx------ 43 DOM\user1        DOM\domain-user  4096 Jan 10 08:00 > user1 drwx------   5 DOM\user2        DOM\domain-user  4096 Jan 11 > 08:13 user2 drwx------ 92 DOM\user3       

Hi, no, that's my fault. I changed the UIDs and user names in my "ls -l" to unpersonalized/example data for my mail and didn't think about putting these values into the range. A better unpersonalized data example would look like: ---------- drwx------ 43 DOM\user1        DOM\group  4096 Jan 10 08:00 user1 drwx------   5 DOM\user2        DOM\group  4096 Jan 11 08:13 user2

Many thanks Rowland. Yes, I don't understand idmaps, but I _think_ I'm getting it. I have added the gid of 60002 for Domain Admins and undertaken some 'chgrp' tasks. I've now got a domain member with shares that presents the correct ownership. All looks good. I'm still slightly confused why I have two ranges within my member smb.conf: idmap config * : backend = tdb