similar to: dovecot-shared

Hello, I currently have a setup on my system with what I call "magic folders" to enable spam filter training. Here's how it works: 1. If you have a false-negative, put the spam into the Spam.Report folder 2. If you have a false-positive (which has all kinds of ugly spamassassin protective markup in it), put the message into the Spam.NotSpam folder

Can shared/public namespaces' prefixes have a common prefix? :) namespace public { separator = / prefix = zz/shared/ location = maildir:/var/maildir/shared:INDEX=/var/maildir/%n/shared subscriptions = no } # to share other employees mailboxes (term'd or admin access) namespace shared { separator = / prefix = zz/shared/%%u/ location =

Am I correct in believing that one cannot match on multiple columns? One can indeed subset on multiple criteria from different variables (or columns) but not from unique combinations thereof. I need to exclude about 10000 rows from 108000 rows of data based on several unique combinations of identifiers in two columns. Only merge() seems to be able to do that. Merge would allow me to positively

I'm unable to get dovecot-lda with sieve filtering to deliver into maildir folders. The examples on the wiki explicitly say "mbox", so I'm wondering, does the dovecot-lda sieve implementation not support filtering into maildir folders? -frank

maybe this is a silly question ;-) But why is it possible to login on a machine with a locked account (passwd -l ) via pubkey-authentication (authorized_keys) ? I use OpenSSH3.01p1on Solaris8 with PAM support so I thought this should not happen. If this is the normal behaviour and built in intentionally what would be the easiest way to lock an account without deleting the users authorized_keys ?

My apologies if this isn't the correct posting address -- I didn't see an obvious "report problems here" on the website. Some of the code modifications introduced between 2.2.7 and 2.2.8 don't appear to agree with Solaris, using Sun's CC, with the LDAP support code. Note that I'm linking against the Solaris-bundled LDAP package (SUNWlldap). |% env

TL;DR - when linking from a lazily loaded module and using Linker::LinkOnlyNeeded, bodies of used functions aren't being copied during linking. Previously on one of our products, we would lazily load our runtime module (around 9000 functions), and link some user module into this (which is in all practical use cases much smaller). Then, post linking, we have a pass that runs over the

I have been attempting to replace Procmail with Dovecot as the LDA for my Postfix mail server, but without success. Below is a truncated output from the /var/log/maillog. Aug 9 11:56:20 scorpio postfix/local[4338]: 88C3FC3D1: to=<gerard at localhost.seibercom.net>, orig_to=<gerard at localhost>, relay=local, delay=1119, delays=1118/0.71/0/0.11, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.8.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.8.tar.gz.sig This is mainly to fix the 0777 base_dir creation issue, which could be considered a security hole, exploitable by local users. An attacker could for example replace Dovecot's auth socket and log in as other users. Gaining root privileges isn't possible though. This affects only

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.8.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.8.tar.gz.sig This is mainly to fix the 0777 base_dir creation issue, which could be considered a security hole, exploitable by local users. An attacker could for example replace Dovecot's auth socket and log in as other users. Gaining root privileges isn't possible though. This affects only

Hi I know i might get flamed for asking this in the dovecot mailing list instead of the spamassassin one but i thought someone might be kind enough to help anyway. TIA I'm trying to do site-wide spam filtering with a public namespace but it's not reading the folder i have in the public namespace This is the public namespace set in my dovecot.conf #public spam folder namespace public

On 10/12/2020 10:54 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Try this guide: > https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/howto/antispam_with_sieve/ > > Aki I will, but that doesn't seem to answer the question of the header rewriting. How can I explain to rspamd and/or sieve that a message that was delivered, but marked as spam is in fact NOT spam? -- Dan Egli On my Test server --------------

+cc Artem, who added the LinkOnlyNeeded flag. On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Neil, > > On Apr 20, 2016, at 5:20 AM, Neil Henning via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > TL;DR - when linking from a lazily loaded module and using > Linker::LinkOnlyNeeded, bodies of used functions

Are there any plans on the table to add native support for two-factor authentication, such as password *and* public key? Visa PCI standards require two-factor authentication for remote access and if password+key was available in openssh it would be much easier to maintain and support than a full-blown vpn with all the cross-platform compatibility issues that come with one. Thanks! Jacob

I know this is slightly OT but folks discuss zfs compatible hardware here all the time. :) Has anyone used something like this combination? <http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=1346664> <http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=1854700> It''d be nice to have externally accessible CF slots for my NAS. I can''t put them into a drive bay because

It's sometimes desired to be able to alter login policy depending upon how the person was connecting for the ssh server. For example you might want different rules on the internal and external interface of a gateway. In another setup you might want an sshd with a different login policy running on a different port - and setup different firewalling rules (for example). I have implemented such

I just added auth caching with pam, and I'm getting this error: dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] auth(default): file passdb.c: line 178 (passdb_init): assertion failed: (passdb->passdb->default_pass_scheme != NULL || passdb->passdb->cache_key == NULL) A google search turns up <http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot-cvs/2005-March/004117.html> which looks approx like this

What are people doing to affect the sort order of mailboxes in outlook? Apple Mail and MS Outlook similarly suck in that they do not sort '~' correctly -- mailboxes starting with '~' are first instead of last. At least I think this is the fault of the client, since Mulberry sorts correctly. At least with Apple Mail I can drag and drop mailboxes into any display order I like, so

I am connecting to smbd over a vpn connnection. After tunnelled traffic comes out of the vpn it hits firewall rules. Per <http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/securing-samba.html#firewallports> I am allowing 135/TCP 137/UDP 138/UDP 139/TCP 445/TCP through the firewall. With this configuration, mounting an smb share from win XP home SP2 takes 2 or 2.5

Hello all, and Johannes if you're around, I was trying to set up the "new" antispam plugin with the mailtrain backend, and i was trying to use the sendmail binary that's part of a qmail system. The message wouldn't get sent and i kept getting exit error 100 from the /var/qmail/bin/sendmail binary. To try to figure out what was happening, i mean a fake sendmail program,