similar to: Compile problem on AIX with dovecot 1.2 rev 10449:a164075ea33a

Am building sieve plugin on AIX. This is revision 1095:8010f1eb66b3. I see the following error when doing the build: rm -fr .libs/lib90_sieve_plugin.lax^M mkdir .libs/lib90_sieve_plugin.lax^M rm -fr .libs/lib90_sieve_plugin.lax/libsieve.a^M mkdir .libs/lib90_sieve_plugin.lax/libsieve.a^M (cd .libs/lib90_sieve_plugin.lax/libsieve.a && ar x /usr/sadmin/src/

Hi, Software: AIX 5.3 dovecot-2.0-pigeonhole revision 1234:7b3db97399de with dovecot revision 10621:a978089d090b I'm having problems installing managesieve. I modified the Makefile because DESTDIR was not being found. Here is what I changed to make it work: echo " $(INSTALL_PROGRAM_ENV) $(LIBTOOL) --mode=install $(dovecot_pkglibexecPROGRAMS_INSTALL) '$$p'

Hi, I have rewritten the patches I submitted earlier today for the CVS HEAD. Some of the changes were already committed months ago. On 2007/03/15 12:30, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > That's ok, but I'm not sure about bsearch_insert_pos(). It's the way it > is mostly because I wanted to keep bsearch() API. If it can't return > void * then maybe it could be

Afternoon all. I'm seeing a segfault in dovecot 2.2.12 (debian package 1:2.2.12-2). I can log into dovecot fine with mutt, but the segfaults seem to occur when postfix (2.11.0, debian package 2.11.0-1+b1) tries to deliver a message. This was working fine under 2.2.9 (I can downgrade to that and delivery works). Can anyone help? Doveconf -n, and backtrace follow.

When attempting to save a message from the INBOX to a folder in a collection (like, .projects.dovecot), I get behavior like this (in GDB). Any clue what might be going wrong? Here's where a SIGABRT happens: 280 return array->buffer->used / array->element_size; This is the stack trace: (gdb) where #0 mail_index_map_get_ext_idx (map=0x1200c0db0, ext_id=0,

Feature Requests item #10449, was opened at 2007-04-29 13:15 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=221&aid=10449&group_id=35 Category: Documentation Group: None Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: Evan Light (sleight42) Assigned to: Alex Fenton (brokentoy) Summary: RDoc Initial Comment: It would be hugely beneficial if wxRuby''s

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10449 Summary: Allow testing of supported parameter(s) Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com

Hi All, I have my dovecot/imap crashing on my Centos7 server. Below is the stacktrace I got: #0? 0x00007f32d9b84e58 in array_count_i (array=0x55b332a1f8f8) at array.h:155? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?No locals.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??#1? array_get_i (count_r=<synthetic pointer>, array=0x55b332a1f8f8) at array.h:209? ? ? ? ? ?

Hi all, I have a Dovecot core that I am trying to track down, in an attempt to replicate so I can log a bug report, and am hoping others might be able to help me as I?m reaching my limit. My working theory is that two user sessions are active at the same time, one of the sessions is ?mid-search? (or perhaps in idle state) on a virtual folder where the number of results is zero (due to a null

Hi, all. I am trying to set up SAMBA PDC with OpenLDAP using smbldap-tools from IDEALX. This is on a SLES 9 and I had run the latest online update as well as SP1 and SP2 for it. At this point smb is off and ldap is running. I have gotten up to where I needed to test for: ldapsearch -x -b "dc=sample,dc=com" "(ObjectClass=*)" # extended LDIF # # LDAPv3 # base

I installed dovecot 1.1 on our system yesterday, and found a few bugs so far. Here is the list: BUG #1: can't access some folders Details: a select "RSS.A List Apart" * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft $$$INDEXED###) * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft $$$INDEXED### \*)] Flags permitted. * 52 EXISTS * 0 RECENT * OK [UNSEEN 50] First unseen.

Hi, I have been able to build R-2.9.2 on AIX 6.1 and AIX 5.2. However, I failed to build R-2.10.0 and later releases on these AIX platforms. The error messages I got are attached below: "connections.c", line 461.10: 1506-022 (S) "truncate64" is not a member of "struct Rconn". "connections.c", line 772.10: 1506-022 (S) "truncate64" is not a member

On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Kevin Brott wrote: > Hrm - I'll have to run this on one of my linux boxxen and then schlep the > source over - the AIX/HP-UX boxenn have an older version of the autoconf > tools and autoreconf is broken/missing ... and that seems to work. > > Now the build fails here on AIX 6.1/7.1 ... > > xlc_r -O2 -qarch=ppc -qalloca -I/usr/include

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 04:17:37PM -0800, Kevin Brott wrote: > Hrm - must have been a timing issue or my user error. In any case, just > pulled the latest commits ... > > *AIX 6.1/7.1 now fails here:* > *...* > xlc_r -O2 -qarch=ppc -qalloca -I/usr/include > -I/opt/freeware/include -I. -I. -O2 -qarch=ppc -qalloca -I/usr/include > -I/opt/freeware/include

> From: Prof Brian Ripley > > We do have alpha/beta test periods for new releases of R, so > would anyone > who did test AIX please confirm that they did succeed. (No > one reported > an error, including yourself: are any AIX users interested in helping > having R available for AIX?) It is much better to have such reports > during alpha test, or at least beta

On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Kevin Brott wrote: > > Yup - that cleared that hurdle ... now it dies here on AIX: > > xlc_r -O2 -qarch=ppc -qalloca -I/usr/include -I/opt/freeware/include > -I. -I. -O2 -qarch=ppc -qalloca -I/usr/include -I/opt/freeware/include > -DSSHDIR=\"/usr/local/etc\" -D_PATH_SSH_PROGRAM=\"/usr/local/bin/ssh\" >

I thought I'd give this another shot before the official release. I tried building R-beta_2004-04-07 on the AIX system that I have access to, and it seemed to failed at lazy-loading survival. I'd very much appreciate any pointer on what to try or look for next. 1. I set OBJECT_MODE to 64 for building 64-bit binary. 2. I edited config.site with the following: CC="xlc_r"

Hi all, With the bug in tre identified I am trying to move forward - one step at a time. As I am getting some errors that prevent make completing with version 3.2.3, and R-devel introduces new issues (that I will face when I get to them) I would appreciate some guidance with output of "make check" (of 3.1.3) and the final message I run into when trying to build 3.2.3. Maybe they

I am trying to understand cut so I can divide a list of numbers into 10 group: 0-9.0 10-10.9 20-20.9 30-30.9, 40-40.9, 50-50.9 60-60.9 70-70.9 80-80.9 90-90.9 As I try to do this, I have been playing with the cut function. Surprising the following for applications of cut give me the exact same groups. This surprises me given that I have varied parameters include.lowest and right. Can someone

Have you read FAQ 7.31 recently, John? Your whole premise is flawed. You should be thinking of ranges [0,10), [10,20), and so on because numbers ending in 0.9 are never going to be exact. -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On April 16, 2016 7:38:50 PM PDT, John Sorkin <jsorkin at grecc.umaryland.edu> wrote: >I am trying to understand cut so I can divide a list of numbers