Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Seeing "Corrupted transaction log file" error messages."
2012 Sep 21
3
Dovecot 1.2.11 panic in mail-transaction-log-view?
I'm seeing this periodically in my logs for a specific user (followed by a backtrace which I've deleted from this post):
Panic: file dovecot-1.2.11/src/lib-index/mail-transaction-log-view.c: line 290 (mail_transaction_log_view_set): assertion failed: (min_file_seq != max_file_seq || max_file_seq != view->head->hdr.file_seq || max_file_offset != (uoff_t)-1 || min_file_offset <=
2011 Feb 08
1
How to recover a mail box from an assertion failure
I'm running Dovecot version 1.2.11 and getting this assertion error on a user's mail:
Panic: file /home/durket/dovecot-1.2.11/src/lib-index/mail-transaction-log-view.c: line 290 (mail_transaction_log_view_set): assertion failed: (min_file_seq != max_file_seq || max_file_seq != view->head->hdr.file_seq || max_file_offset != (uoff_t)-1 || min_file_offset <=
2009 Nov 05
4
Help needed: Index filesystem permissions problem after switch to V1.2 and back to V1.1
After V1.2 had been up for a while, I started seeing tons of syslog
error messages like this:
Nov 5 09:11:52 mercury mail:err|error dovecot: IMAP(sdean): stat(/var/dcindx/sdean/.imap/DadEstate)
failed: Permission denied (euid=202(sdean) egid=200(hcrc) missing +x perm: /var/dcindx)
Ownernship and Permissions are:
The index filesystem
2726 root at mercury:/var/dcindx ## ls -ald
drwx--S---
2009 Jan 20
1
Errmsgs b4 and after migration DC V1.0.15 to V1.1.8
Last Wednesday at 12:21 I made this switch, which seemed to be
uneventful. In any case, no user has reported problems since the
migration. Not content to leave well enough alone, this morning I
scanned the syslog and maillog for dovecot related errors. What I found
was that:
Before the Migration===========================
I saw a lot of SSL errors that look like this:
> Jan 14 11:49:23
2009 Nov 13
1
Ownership and permissions for the index directory/filesystem
I recently upgraded from DC 1.1.15 to 1.2.6. The /var/dcindx index root
directory is:
drwxrwsrwt 3962 root sys 192512 Nov 13 11:56 ./
thus 3777.
It appears that the user index directories created under DC1.1 look like
this (here for /var/dcindx/cep):
drwx--S--- 5 cep sys 256 Nov 13 14:26 cep/
while those created under V1.2 look like:
drwx------ 3
2010 Jan 29
4
Want to have some users with Maildir, some with mbox
Want to have some users with Maildir, some with mbox, as I migrate from
mbox format to maildir over the space of a month. After everyone is
converted to maildir, I'll change the mail_location in dovecot.conf.
During the interim, can I use the Custom mailbox location script (at the
bottom of the Mail Location DC Wiki page)?
> if [ -d $HOME/.maildir ]; then
> export
2013 Jan 25
1
assert in mail-transaction-log-file.c
I setup new server with dovecot 2.1.12 and mboxes from backup (moboxes
was used with dovecot 1.1.6).
OS: FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE, amd64.
All index files from dovecot 1.1.6 has been deleted.
Some times dovecot processes aborted.
E. g.
Jan 25 03:01:52 ost dovecot: lda(user at example.ru): Panic: file mail-transaction-log-file.c: line 1694 (mail_transaction_log_file_map): assertion failed:
2007 Jul 30
2
apparent bug with filesystem quota and message lists
Don't know if anyone else uses Berkeley derived filesystem quota, but
IBM's AIX does. A little over a week after migrating from UWIMAP to DC
(with mbox format unchanged) everything is clean except for this one
problem:
When users go over quota, when they login the next time, the folder list
is blank. You can imagine the panicked calls to the Helpdesk. If their
quotas are raised or
2017 Apr 06
3
abrt reported "imap killed by SIGBUS"
Hi sbr-services,
Could you give me some idea?
### abrt reported the error as below.
[root at cupop4 log]# abrt-cli list --since 1488267244 id
ad716dbfd3a68bbe0f055e32ebfe562f4f75df43
reason: imap killed by SIGBUS
time: Sun Mar 19 2017 10:58:27 AM JST
cmdline: dovecot/imap
package: dovecot-2.2.10-7.el7
uid: 80180 (acaa2325)
count: 2
Directory:
2010 Jun 01
1
loop
Can any one help it will be very kind, loop statements
I have this table and some more records, I want to reshape it
V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10
TP53 Dis1 Dis2 Dis3 Dis4 Dis5 Dis6
DCI New1 New2 New3 New4
FDI Hi2 H3 H4
GHD I1 I3 I4 I5 I6 I7 I8
I want my new table or matrix to be some thing like this
V1 V2 V3
Tp53 Dis1 Dis2
Tp53 Dis1 Dis3
Tp53 Dis1 Dis4
Tp53 Dis1 Dis5
Tp53 Dis1 Dis6
Tp53 Dis2
2005 Jun 04
0
Crash and Assertion Error
I've attached two backtraces, one from a segfault and another from an
assertion error in imap. I've seen a couple of the same assertion and
this is the only segfault. It looks like they could be related. They
both have to do with indexing anyway...
The code is from CVS as of May 30.
The segfault happened while imap was doing searches for my pine filters.
I've also noticed that in
2020 Aug 28
1
Backup questions - errors
Hi,
although i've search the archives, there are questions left regarding
backup strategies and errors that occur.
I'm using dovecot 2.3.11.3 with mdbox (mailbox size 50MB - 30GB).
Every night, i ran the following command:
doveadm -o mail_fsync=never -o plugin/quota= -o plugin/zlib_save=gz \
backup -u account mdbox:/nfs/storage/account/mdbox
### incremental backup
Thanks to zlib
2008 May 07
1
Bug [1.1rc5]: Crash during "CPU architecture changed" index upgrade
Hello List,
We just migrated from a PPC Xserve to an Intel Xserve.
I used "rsync" to bring everyone's home directories over, and in the
back of my mind wondered about how it would handle the binary index
files... only one way to find out! :)
Once I tried to login to IMAP, I got the following results:
May 6 19:46:48 posh dovecot[1169]: IMAP(cabel): Rebuilding index
file
2019 Mar 27
2
Panic: file mail-transaction-log-file.c: line 105 (mail_transaction_log_file_free): assertion failed: (!file->locked)
Hello.
I have one account with heavy traffic (big mails) and quite often
indexes get corrupted.
This is dovecot 2.3.5 on local fs (xfs), Linux kernel 4.19.20, glibc 2.28.
When corruption happens lmtp and pop3 segfault on accessing it like:
> Mar 27 11:13:50 mbox dovecot[22370]: lmtp(24428): Connect from local
2009 Sep 07
2
file->buffer_offset + file->buffer->used == file->sync_offset
I got the following panic on 1.2.3:
Panic: file mail-transaction-log-append.c: line 88 (log_buffer_move_to_memory): assertion failed: (file->buffer_offset + file->buffer->used == file->sync_offset)
It's probably related to the file system holding the indexes being full.
2006 Feb 25
1
dovecot-1.0-beta3 in production
Hello there!
I've migrated our courier-imap production imap/pop server to dovecot 1.0-beta
few days ago. In general dovecot performs excellent, but i've encountered
several "bugs" in dovecot log:
--- snip ---
dovecot.log.1.gz:Feb 24 16:05:21 elfstone dovecot: imap(user3 at domain.tld):
Maildir /export/mail/domain.tld/user3 sync: UID inserted in the middle of
mailbox (47681
2007 Aug 08
2
[LLVMdev] Destination register needs to be valid after callee saved register restore when tail calling
Hello, Arnold.
> with the sentence i tried to express the question whether there is a
> way to persuade the code generator to use another register to load (or
> move) the function pointer to (right before the callee saved register
> restore) but thinking a little further that's nonsense.
Why don't define some special op for callee address and custom lower it?
I really
2013 Feb 15
10
reading data
Hi,
#working directory data1 #changed name data to data1.? Added some files in each of sub directories a1, a2, etc.
?indx1<- indx[indx!=""]
lapply(indx1,function(x) list.files(x))
#[[1]]
#[1] "a1.txt"??????? "mmmmm11kk.txt"
#[[2]]
#[1] "a2.txt"??????? "mmmmm11kk.txt"
#[[3]]
#[1] "a3.txt"??????? "mmmmm11kk.txt"
#[[4]]
#[1]
2007 Mar 15
5
[PATCH 0/5] fix gcc warnings in CVS HEAD
Hi,
I have rewritten the patches I submitted earlier today for the CVS
HEAD. Some of the changes were already committed months ago.
On 2007/03/15 12:30, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote:
> That's ok, but I'm not sure about bsearch_insert_pos(). It's the way it
> is mostly because I wanted to keep bsearch() API. If it can't return
> void * then maybe it could be
2007 Aug 08
4
[LLVMdev] Destination register needs to be valid after callee saved register restore when tail calling
Hello, Arnold.
> Is there a way to indicate that the register the tail call
> instruction uses as destination needs to be valid after the callee
> saved registers have been restored? (some X86InstrInfo.td foo magic
> maybe ?)
It's wrong way to do the things. Because in this case you either violate
the ABI for callee, or you're restricted to do tail call lowering only
for