Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "Released Sieve v0.1.13 for Dovecot v1.2.6"
2009 Feb 12
0
Released Sieve v0.1.3 and ManageSieve v0.11.3 for Dovecot v1.2.beta1
Hello Dovecot users,
It has been about two months since the last release of the new Sieve
implementation and the ManageSieve service for Dovecot v1.2. Therefore,
this release contains quite a few changes. It adds new sieve features
like the enotify extension and multiscript support. Also, quite a few
(user-reported) bugs were fixed since the last release.
Changelog Sieve v0.1.3:
*
2009 Feb 12
0
Released Sieve v0.1.3 and ManageSieve v0.11.3 for Dovecot v1.2.beta1
Hello Dovecot users,
It has been about two months since the last release of the new Sieve
implementation and the ManageSieve service for Dovecot v1.2. Therefore,
this release contains quite a few changes. It adds new sieve features
like the enotify extension and multiscript support. Also, quite a few
(user-reported) bugs were fixed since the last release.
Changelog Sieve v0.1.3:
*
2010 Oct 04
0
Released Pigeonhole Sieve v0.1.18 and ManageSieve v0.11.12 for Dovecot v1.2.15
Hello Dovecot users,
The recent release of Dovecot v1.2.15 is a good opportunity to release
new versions of Sieve and ManageSieve for Dovecot v1.2. These releases
consist entirely of bugfixes and introduce no new features.
Changelog Sieve v0.1.18:
- Imap4flags: fixed segfault bug occuring in multiscript context.
Occured in specific situations when a script using imap4flags was
2010 Oct 04
0
Released Pigeonhole Sieve v0.1.18 and ManageSieve v0.11.12 for Dovecot v1.2.15
Hello Dovecot users,
The recent release of Dovecot v1.2.15 is a good opportunity to release
new versions of Sieve and ManageSieve for Dovecot v1.2. These releases
consist entirely of bugfixes and introduce no new features.
Changelog Sieve v0.1.18:
- Imap4flags: fixed segfault bug occuring in multiscript context.
Occured in specific situations when a script using imap4flags was
2009 Oct 05
1
v1.2.6 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.6.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.6.tar.gz.sig
A couple of random things:
- I decided to start using "hg sign" to gpg sign all releases in
mercurial repository.
- v2.0.alpha1 will hopefully be released in a week or two.
Changes since 1.2.5:
* Upgraded to Unicode 5.2.0
+ Added authtest utility for doing passdb and
2009 Oct 05
1
v1.2.6 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.6.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.6.tar.gz.sig
A couple of random things:
- I decided to start using "hg sign" to gpg sign all releases in
mercurial repository.
- v2.0.alpha1 will hopefully be released in a week or two.
Changes since 1.2.5:
* Upgraded to Unicode 5.2.0
+ Added authtest utility for doing passdb and
2006 Aug 01
1
Inconsistent handling of CRLF in APPEND
One of the recent 1.0 commits relating to CRLF handling (maybe 2006-06-24)
has changed the behaviour of APPEND when using mbox files with ordinary
plain text emails.
When a client stores a new message using an APPEND command (eg. saving a
draft or copy of a sent message), it uses CRLF consistently as a
line-ending throughout the literal data block over the wire - both for the
header and the
2009 Apr 18
0
Released Sieve v0.1.5 and ManageSieve v0.11.4 for Dovecot v1.2.rc3 and ManageSieve v0.10.6 for Dovecot v1.1.14
Hello Dovecot users,
This is a simultaneous release of new versions of Sieve-related software
for Dovecot v1.1 and v1.2. Only the Sieve implementation itself has seen
significant development. The ManageSieve packages only have small fixes
and the ManageSieve patches are updated as usual to match the new
Dovecot releases.
Changelog Sieve v0.1.5:
* Ported the implementation of the Sieve
2009 Apr 18
0
Released Sieve v0.1.5 and ManageSieve v0.11.4 for Dovecot v1.2.rc3 and ManageSieve v0.10.6 for Dovecot v1.1.14
Hello Dovecot users,
This is a simultaneous release of new versions of Sieve-related software
for Dovecot v1.1 and v1.2. Only the Sieve implementation itself has seen
significant development. The ManageSieve packages only have small fixes
and the ManageSieve patches are updated as usual to match the new
Dovecot releases.
Changelog Sieve v0.1.5:
* Ported the implementation of the Sieve
2009 Dec 19
1
Released Pigeonhole Sieve v0.1.14 and ManageSieve v0.11.10 for Dovecot v1.2.9
Hello Dovecot users,
Due to personal matters I haven't had time to do anything in the last
few weeks. Before that I provided some pre-releases and since nobody
indicated problems with those, I release them definitively now. I hope
the shit storm has blown over, so that I can dedicate more of my time
towards Pigeonhole development.
The Sieve release involves a large architectural change,
2018 Apr 12
0
lda fails in parse_angle_addr if sieve is enabled
Op 12-4-2018 om 15:52 schreef Leo Gaspard:
> Here are the first two headers of the mail you just sent, delivered with
> the rolled-back-into dovecot 2.3.0.1:
>
> Return-Path: stephan at rename-it.nl
> Delivered-To: dovecot at leo.gaspard.io
>
> Does that clear the facts? The Return-Path appears to not have <>, which
> appears to be opposed to RFC5322. So I guess
2009 Dec 19
1
Released Pigeonhole Sieve v0.1.14 and ManageSieve v0.11.10 for Dovecot v1.2.9
Hello Dovecot users,
Due to personal matters I haven't had time to do anything in the last
few weeks. Before that I provided some pre-releases and since nobody
indicated problems with those, I release them definitively now. I hope
the shit storm has blown over, so that I can dedicate more of my time
towards Pigeonhole development.
The Sieve release involves a large architectural change,
2005 Oct 25
2
SpeexJitter and TCP/IP
Hi!
I am still trying to clean the voice after procesing it with speex echo
cancellation filter.
I get some artifacts, the echo is removed, but you can here some metallic
voices in background.
Jean, in your test client you are using UDP connection and SpeexJitter to
make sure UDP packets are in order. What if I use TCP/IP, do I still have
to use SpeexJitter when using speex_echo_cancel ?
2012 Nov 18
0
[LLVMdev] A lenient construction mode?
Is there a way to do a lenient construction of the IR? In particular one
that doesn't do type checking?
I am having the problem in my generator that occasionally I produce the
wrong type which leads to an abort during the construction phase. If I
were able to complete my construction and look at the textual assembly
I'd probably be able to see my mistake easier.
--
edA-qa mort-ora-y
--
2015 Feb 15
0
dovecot 2.2.15 script_after not executed
On 2/12/2015 2:12 AM, Florin Portase wrote:
>
> On 2015-02-12 01:01, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>
>> On 2/11/2015 10:37 PM, Portase Florin wrote:
>>> On 2/11/2015 8:41 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>>>> On 2/11/2015 7:34 PM, Florin Portase wrote:
>>>>> Hello guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm having troubles making
2015 Feb 12
2
dovecot 2.2.15 script_after not executed
On 2015-02-12 01:01, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> On 2/11/2015 10:37 PM, Portase Florin wrote: On 2/11/2015 8:41 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: On 2/11/2015 7:34 PM, Florin Portase wrote: Hello guys,
>
> I'm having troubles making "script_after" to exec sieve scripts::
>
> Keep in mind that the sieve_after script is only executed when the
> "keep" action [1 [1]]
2009 Dec 14
4
Problem with dovecot-sieve and russian
Hello
I have a problem with dovecot-sieve. When I create a folder in russian,
the filter is not working properly. It creates a new folder with the same
name and delivers the letter there.
For example, I created a folder called &BD8EQAQ4BDIENQRC-/, but the letter
got in &-BD8EQAQ4BDIENQRC-/. In all cases, the difference in the sign -.
The folders in the english language is no problem.
#
2010 Mar 02
2
Intel: Overly restrictive test for availablility of CPUID masking MSRs?
Hi,
http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg?rev/aab9fbd6ffa0 from
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-07/msg00518.html
restricts the CPUID masking feature to model 0x1d or model 0x17 with
stepping >=4:
if (!((model == 0x1d) || ((model == 0x17) && ((eax & 0xf) >=
4)))) {
/* fail ... */
A Xeon E5520 which is supposed to
2017 Nov 08
5
Best practice for creating an RO LDAP User in AD...
Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba
In chel di` si favelave...
> Not sure what you are proposing is going to work, AD expects every user
> to be a member of Domain Users, even though there is nothing in AD to
> show membership.
Ah.
> Do you require this user to visible on all domain machines ?
[...]
> It might help if you could explain how you are going to use your new
> user
2009 Sep 01
2
Sieve segfault on sieve-before scripts
I use dovecot 1.2.4 release with sieve 0.1.12
If I setup sieve-before script and latest script contains "keep" at
the very end and no personal scripts found then segfault take place.
here is part of exim log:
2009-09-01 18:43:06 1MiUZA-0005V9-IB ** ivanov_maxim at domain.my
<admin at domain.my> R=localuser T=local_delivery: Child process of
local_delivery transport (running