similar to: Move messages marked as Spam

Since upgrading to 2.3.0 / 0.5.0.1, incoming PDFs are getting mangled. It seems to be happening when I use vnd.dovecot.filter. When I comment out the block, things come through fine. My filter block looks like this: require "vnd.dovecot.filter"; filter "bogofilter_filter"; if header :contains "X-Bogosity" [ "Spam,

> On 21 Dec, 2017, at 14:37, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> wrote: > > Op 12/19/2017 om 8:41 AM schreef Adam Weinberger: >> I'm getting a behaviour with pigeonhole that I wasn't expecting. Am I >> misunderstanding the design? >> >> I run my messages through a vnd.dovecot.filter. It's essentially this: >> >> filter

> On 19 Jan, 2018, at 4:39, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > > > On 19.01.2018 04:35, Adam Weinberger wrote: >> Since upgrading to 2.3.0 / 0.5.0.1, incoming PDFs are getting mangled. >> It seems to be happening when I use vnd.dovecot.filter. When I comment >> out the block, things come through fine. >> >> My filter block looks like

Op 1/20/2018 om 11:01 PM schreef Adam Weinberger: >> On 20 Jan, 2018, at 10:05, Adam Weinberger <adamw at adamw.org> wrote: >> >> >>> On 19 Jan, 2018, at 4:39, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 19.01.2018 04:35, Adam Weinberger wrote: >>>> Since upgrading to 2.3.0 / 0.5.0.1, incoming

# 2.2.12: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.15.4-x86_64-linode45 x86_64 openSUSE 12.3 (x86_64) Short version: 1) I filter out spam by using a dovecot sieve filter to act based on a header inserted by bogofilter 2) In some cases, sieve fails to correctly file based on this header 3) Testing with sieve-test indicates that it's testing the wrong header 4) Suggestions? Am I doing

I'm getting a behaviour with pigeonhole that I wasn't expecting. Am I misunderstanding the design? I run my messages through a vnd.dovecot.filter. It's essentially this: filter "spam_filter"; if spamheaders { fileinto "spam"; stop; } Mail stored in the spam folder is the filtered version, but the implicit-keep message is the original, unfiltered

----- Forwarded message from Klaus Dittrich <kladit@t-online.de> ----- From: kladit@t-online.de (Klaus Dittrich) Subject: files of length zero Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 17:08:47 +0100 To: mbp@samba.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=0.10.2 Hi Martin, MS-Windows users here sometimes make the expierience to become files of length zero when

Hi I have assigned quotas to my users and in turn use quota_warning for my users send them a message saying that the level of its quota is about to be exceeded. when the quota is exceeded, the script runs again sending a message to the user and is rejected by the server. there is any way to get the message when the postmaster, is delivered to the mailbox even when exceeded the quota or

Hello everyone Happy new year . This is the first time I address to the list I have the following situation and I need help from all you people I have dovecot 0.9-11 and i want to migrate to a superior version like dovecot 1.0 looking forward to implement quotas in my system , and use the function deliver with postfix. My Scenario is as follow Dovecot + LDAP (ADS) + postfix My actual

DEBIAN package information: ii dovecot-common 0.99.11-3 ii dovecot-imapd 0.99.11-3 ii bogofilter 0.93.1-1 Apologies for cross-posting, but I think the problem lies somewhere in here. Maybe someone can tell me something useful. Now, I've confirmed the following: I received a mail message that was not spam, of size 2132 originally. clamav scanned it and bumped the size up to 2356

Hi, on my small Xen-virtualised server with 48 MiB RAM I use Postfix and Dovecot, because the Debian administrators dislike qmail [1], which is in my opinion despite some maintainability and code quality issues a quite well designed software, because it mostly follows the UNIX principles. Postfix is not able to sort my E-Mail into different Maildir folders and after I looked at procmail's

Hi People I use the dovecot version 1.0.10 , in my config I have set a global quota value = 10 MB but I want to override for some users this value , getting from my ldap other value like = 30 MB. Dovecot obtain this value from ldap: (((((Feb 1 12:12:26 gandalf dovecot: auth(default): client out: OK 1 user=michel at home.com quota= maildir:storage=30240))))) Feb 1 12:12:26 gandalf

> On 20 Jan, 2018, at 10:05, Adam Weinberger <adamw at adamw.org> wrote: > > >> On 19 Jan, 2018, at 4:39, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 19.01.2018 04:35, Adam Weinberger wrote: >>> Since upgrading to 2.3.0 / 0.5.0.1, incoming PDFs are getting mangled. >>> It seems to be happening when I use

Op 12/22/2017 om 3:43 AM schreef Adam Weinberger: >> On 21 Dec, 2017, at 14:37, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> wrote: >> >> Op 12/19/2017 om 8:41 AM schreef Adam Weinberger: >>> I'm getting a behaviour with pigeonhole that I wasn't expecting. Am I >>> misunderstanding the design? >>> >>> I run my messages through a

Op 1/21/2018 om 4:34 PM schreef Stephan Bosch: > Op 1/20/2018 om 11:01 PM schreef Adam Weinberger: >>> On 20 Jan, 2018, at 10:05, Adam Weinberger <adamw at adamw.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 19 Jan, 2018, at 4:39, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 19.01.2018 04:35,

On 19.01.2018 04:35, Adam Weinberger wrote: > Since upgrading to 2.3.0 / 0.5.0.1, incoming PDFs are getting mangled. > It seems to be happening when I use vnd.dovecot.filter. When I comment > out the block, things come through fine. > > My filter block looks like this: > require "vnd.dovecot.filter"; > filter "bogofilter_filter"; > >

Hello Dovecot users, Finally, after little more than a year, I finished the first release of the new Sieve implementation for Dovecot. The main reason for rewriting the Sieve engine is to provide more reliable script execution and to provide better error messages to users and system administrators. Also, since the Sieve language evolves quickly, with new language extensions published every

Hello Dovecot users, Finally, after little more than a year, I finished the first release of the new Sieve implementation for Dovecot. The main reason for rewriting the Sieve engine is to provide more reliable script execution and to provide better error messages to users and system administrators. Also, since the Sieve language evolves quickly, with new language extensions published every

Hello I have installed Dovecot as a POP3 server, IMAP on my internal network, the authentication against Windows Active Directory. I would like to know how to setup a second server dovecot as my proxy server for external users outside the network, in another segment of different IP addresses, or at least define which mailboxes will be stored on another server to be accessible to both

Hi People I have a two question I use dovecot 1.0.10 I have quota maildir 1- I want to use the last version of quota 1.1 in my dovecot , i have to patch then, so which file i have to apply ? http://dovecot.org/patches/1.0/ this one quota-rewrite-1.0.9.diff ??? When i using the original version with out quota new 1.1 , in my mailbox is created a file called maildirsize with the quota ,