Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches similar to: "SOT: Removing _extra_ linefeeds from MSOutlook(?) messages"
2007 Mar 27
0
Asterisk MSOutlook Dialer
Hello everyone,
we just wrote a little MSOutlook address book dialer interfaced with Asterisk. It is a small (400k) exe that you need to install. It is completely free to use, either for educational purpose or otherwise. You can download it at http://www.voip.com.sg/voip_products/voip_asterisk_outlook_dialer.html . Please send your comments to
me directly as I am the developer for it.
With
2009 Aug 03
1
Linefeeds in mailbox names
Wonder if I should just disallow creating mailboxes whose name contains
CR or LF characters? Wonder how many peoples' scripts/tools already
would break if a user created such mailbox names.. :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
2003 Nov 05
3
How to represent pure linefeeds chr(10) under R for Windows
I need to write out with write.table() a csv file allowing for line feeds
(pure chr(10)) as part of character field (not as a line seperator).
How can I do that?
Best regards
Jens Oehlschl?gel
--
2003 Nov 06
2
Summary: How to represent pure linefeeds chr(10) under R for Windows
Thanks to all who have responded.
My concern was to be able to write a csv file that can have line feeds in
string columns chr(10).
Why? Excel allows line feeds chr(10) within cells and line breaks
chr(13)+chr(10) at line ending,
but the windows version of R automatically replaces \n by \r\n in writing
and \r\n by \n in reading (text mode).
The clues for a solution came from Brian Ripley and
2008 Mar 12
1
[Bug 744] New: hex_to_byte should trim a linefeed at the end of a file
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=744
Summary: hex_to_byte should trim a linefeed at the end of a file
Classification: Development
Product: zfs-crypto
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Solaris
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo:
2008 Jun 03
2
mbox: extra linefeed after Content-Length header in 1.1.rc8
mbox messages gets header corruption caused by an extra linefeed after
Content-Length
Users sees their mails in Sent mbox folder without the from and to
fields, without attachments and with the date of 1/1/1970
Diego.
---
Here is an anonymized header:
>From xxxxxxxx at xxxxxx.xxxxxx.xxxxx.xx.xx Tue Jun 03 09:14:33 2008
Message-ID: <xxxxxxxx.xxxxxxx at xxxxxx.xxxxx.xx.xx>
X-UID: 3913
2016 Jul 03
2
clib `open` writes a linefeed to stdout when used in the JIT
I'm having a problem with my code generating empty lines and it appears
to be the CLib `open` function generating an empty line when used within
the JIT-VM. If I compile my program to an exe file it doesn't happen. I
also have a lot of other code running in the VM without this problem,
it's somehow particular to `open`.
A chunk of my IR that calls `open`:
defer_body_26:
2001 Mar 15
1
supressing linefeed at end of file
Hello,
I want to do simulations with an external simulation model. For this
purpose I wrote a R-script which makes the pre- and post-processing of
the data (generate scenarios, analyze results).
The R-script writes the input file for the simulation with e.g.
write(x, file="test.dat", ncolumns=10)
The problem is, however, that this command (and even constructions with
cat) will add a
2009 Oct 13
1
loofah 0.3.1 Released
loofah version 0.3.1 has been released!
* <http://loofah.rubyforge.org>
* <http://rubyforge.org/projects/loofah>
* <http://github.com/flavorjones/loofah>
Loofah is an HTML sanitizer. It will always fix broken markup, but
can also sanitize unsafe tags in a few different ways, and transform
the markup for storage or display.
It''s built on top of Nokogiri and libxml2, so
2003 Aug 26
2
[LLVMdev] repeated recursion with "frozen" arguments
Hello Chris,
Tuesday, August 26, 2003, 11:02:45 PM, you wrote:
>> there is a very simple using case concerning LLVM and I am wondering
>> whether it might be optimized at LLVM layer:
>>
>> //-----------
>> int rec_func(int x, int y) {
>> if(y<0) return x;
>> return y + rec_func(x, y-1); // should we really push x?
>> }
CL> Probably not,
2005 Aug 10
1
additional boot options with older Compaq 1850R and DL360 and DL380 units
greetings
does the list at this url cover *all* options or are there some hidden or
newer ones by chance?
http://www.centos.org/docs/4/html/rhel-ig-x8664-multi-en-4/ap-bootopts.html
i am playing with CentOS 4 on some Compaq dual PIII hardware. The first unit
is an 1850R with dual 500Mhz. If you need more info please let me know. it
is a basic unit with raid controller and a Gig of DRAM etc.
2003 Aug 26
0
[LLVMdev] repeated recursion with "frozen" arguments
> CL> Probably not, at least not in the near future. At some point I have had
> CL> thoughts about implementing a tail recursion pass, but without prior
> CL> transformation, this function would not be a candidate.
>
> wait... if you break this C-example at the place as you did then it is
> absolutely not what I have meant. Indeed, sense of my example comes
> iff the
2004 Oct 26
4
Release of centos-3.3 ISP bill
It turns out that the release of Centos-3.3 was so popular, that it threw us
way over the threshold of our ISP's, and now we are stuck with a _very_ large
bill (as in an estimated 6TB of transfers). While in one hand I am ecstatic
that we are so successful, but on the other hand, that is coming out of the
developers pockets. The developers should be the last ones footing these
bills (and this
2003 Aug 26
4
[LLVMdev] repeated recursion with "frozen" arguments
Hi llvm-devels,
there is a very simple using case concerning LLVM and I am wondering whether it might be optimized at LLVM layer:
//-----------
int rec_func(int x, int y) {
if(y<0) return x;
return y + rec_func(x, y-1); // should we really push x?
}
void main() {
rec_func(1, 1000);
rec_func(2, 2000);
}
//-----------
Guys, don't focus on a stupid mathematics beyond this function
2011 Jun 23
4
markdown conversions
alan said:
> I think I am in agreement,
> if by "isn't necessary" you mean to say that
> simply providing more features to Markdown
> doesn't force end users to use them,
> or even really know they exist.
except that wasn't what i meant.
i mean that it's not necessary to trade simplicity
in order to get the power of additional
2007 Mar 29
0
[926] branches/wxruby2/wxwidgets_282: Update Dialog wx2.6 -> wx2.8 API, remove deprecations and cruft, update doc
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><style type="text/css"><!--
#msg dl { border: 1px #006 solid; background: #369; padding: