similar to: map->hdr.record_size <= tview->record_size

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "map->hdr.record_size <= tview->record_size"

2009 Aug 11
1
dovecot-1.2.3 (managesieve) crash with backtrace
>From the log: Aug 11 09:07:23 postamt dovecot: IMAP(zensy): Panic: file mail-index-transaction-view.c: line 106 (tview_apply_flag_updates): assertion failed: (map->hdr.record_size <= tview->record_size) Aug 11 09:07:23 postamt dovecot: IMAP(zensy): Raw backtrace: imap [0x80f0411] -> imap [0x80f0482] -> imap [0x80efe29] -> imap [0x80c839b] -> imap [0x80cea95] -> imap
2017 Dec 07
2
recover missing messages - files still present in storage
Hi, I have a user account that had almost 20GB of emails and now they're missing. Only a few are available trough IMAP or doveadm. I can see in /path/to/mailbox/storage that thousands of "m." files are still there, summing up 19GB of files. doveconf -n http://termbin.com/7lgc I have tried: accessing via IMAP accessing via doveadm search/fetch/mailbox status doveadm index doveadm
2007 Sep 13
1
Subset Quirk?
Hello All, I am trying to subset a matrix using subset() and it works fine when I use matrix notation, but doesn't work when I use established column names. Sample code is below: library(mvtnorm) library(sm) library(ltm) library(irtoys) k<- 100 set.seed(271828) t <- rmvnorm(n=k,mean=c(-1,0,1),sigma=matrix(c(1,.8,.5,.8,1,.8,.5,.8,1),3,3)) colMeans(t) var(t) pairs(t) #tview
2018 May 28
0
Bug: Dovecot index loosing sync with FTS despite "fts_autoindex = yes"
On 24/05/2018 15:33, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 21 May 2018, at 14.11, kadafax at gmail.com wrote: >> >> Le 21/05/2018 ? 12:38, Aki Tuomi a ?crit : >>> can you try turning on pluign { fts_enforced = yes } and repeat your test? >> >> Same (wrong) result: >> 1. Send an email with "too6Ouka" in the body >> >> 2. Search against
2018 May 24
2
Bug: Dovecot index loosing sync with FTS despite "fts_autoindex = yes"
On 21 May 2018, at 14.11, kadafax at gmail.com wrote: > > Le 21/05/2018 ? 12:38, Aki Tuomi a ?crit : >> can you try turning on pluign { fts_enforced = yes } and repeat your test? > > Same (wrong) result: > 1. Send an email with "too6Ouka" in the body > > 2. Search against "too6Ouka": > # doveadm search -u username mailbox INBOX body too6Ouka
2014 Mar 11
2
Panic: file mail-index-map.c: line 547 (mail_index_map_lookup_seq_range): assertion failed: (first_uid > 0)
Version: 2.2.12 OS: Debian wheezy x86_64 2014 Mar 11 20:06:53 ptb-test imap(flor_hardy): Panic: file mail-index-map.c: line 547 (mail_index_map_lookup_seq_range): assertion failed: (first_uid > 0) 2014 Mar 11 20:06:53 ptb-test imap(flor_hardy): Fatal: master: service(imap): child 2760 killed with signal 6 (core dumped) GNU gdb (GDB) 7.4.1-debian Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation,
2017 Dec 07
0
recover missing messages - files still present in storage
Have you attempted doveadm force-resync -u SUPPRESSED_VICTIM "*"? Aki > On December 7, 2017 at 7:00 PM Webert de Souza Lima <webert.boss at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > I have a user account that had almost 20GB of emails and now they're > missing. > Only a few are available trough IMAP or doveadm. > > I can see in /path/to/mailbox/storage
2008 Dec 01
1
Maildir loses keywords in index beyond 26
(NOTE: I am not on the mailing list so please Cc: me.) dovecot-1.1.6-2.fc10.i386 (configuration not changed from stock) Fedora 10 AMD Athlon XP ext3 Maildir format doesn't store keywords in the index properly -- it goes up to 26 and then further keywords are dropped. I ran the tests with a simple script that feeds the lines from "commands" to Dovecot one at a time and waits for
2013 Sep 19
1
Index error copying compressed message
Hi. Dovecot 2.2, with the zlib plugin, I think we're getting bad index entries on IMAP COPY. On copying a message to an empty folder, in the dovecot error log I see: Sep 19 20:34:25 imap01 dovecot: imap(grain at rp-auth-test.com): Error: Cached message size smaller than expected (615 < 971) Sep 19 20:34:25 imap01 dovecot: imap(grain at rp-auth-test.com): Error: Corrupted index cache file
2005 Sep 08
1
1.0alpha1: another imap core, no assert
Timo, Output of gdb session on the core file attached. This one only produced the following syslog: IMAP(user): UIDs broken with partial sync in mbox file /var/mail/r/user with no assert. Setup: Solaris 9, gcc 4.0.1 for dovecot build. Jeff Earickson Colby College -------------- next part -------------- Script started on Thu Sep 08 10:05:53 2005 %gdb imap core.rtohara GNU gdb 6.3 Copyright
2008 May 20
7
Problems sending large results with backgroundrb
I''m working on an application that does extensive database searching. These searches can take a long time, so we have been working on moving the searches to a backgroundrb worker task so we can provide a sexy AJAX progress bar, and populate the search results as they are available. All of this seems to work fine until the size of the search results gets sufficiently large, when we start
2006 May 22
1
beta8: cores on corrupted index file
Timo, I saw a couple of these cores over the weekend. The syslog says: May 21 19:04:48 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(user): Corrupted index cache file /home/students/s/user/.imap/sent-mail-apr-2004/dovecot.index.cache: indexid changed With a resulting core file from imap at this time. I also discovered a remaining lock file on the person's imap file: -rw------- 1 user
2005 Dec 14
0
Assertion Failure in Current CVS Version
Just installed the latest (Dec. 12) CVS version and one user keeps getting this assertion failure. Todd dovecot: Dec 13 15:53:01 Error: 29718 imap(username): mbox sync: UID inserted in the middle of mailbox /mailhome/new/o/h/username/mbox (4863 > 3417, seq=780, idx_msgs=1913) dovecot: Dec 13 15:53:06 Error: 29718 imap(username): file mail-index-transaction.c: line 129
2008 Mar 08
2
suspect valgrind error in mail-index-map.c
Hi At line 1118 of src//lib-index/mail-index-map.c, inside the function mail_index_map_move_to_memory, there is: mail_index_map_copy_header(map, map); Valgrind is stating that "Source and destination overlap in memcpy". I'm wondering if this code is just coping the same memory over itself, or if it is doing something useful. Regards, Diego Liziero. --- 1104 void
2014 Jul 02
1
Flags in public folders disappear when more than 25 flags are used
Hello, I have been using flags in public folders for quite a while with no problems. Once the flags were added to all clients (Thunderbird), they were visible and synchronized properly. Now I have added some new flags, and in the dovecot-keywords files I see that I am now using more than 25 flags (in which case they are not stored using an additional letter in the filename). Now I see that
2005 Jun 08
2
Debugging test72
When attempting to save a message from the INBOX to a folder in a collection (like, .projects.dovecot), I get behavior like this (in GDB). Any clue what might be going wrong? Here's where a SIGABRT happens: 280 return array->buffer->used / array->element_size; This is the stack trace: (gdb) where #0 mail_index_map_get_ext_idx (map=0x1200c0db0, ext_id=0,
2015 Jun 16
2
Dovecot 2.2.16: disappearing messages, mismatched summaries, duplicated messages, excessive full re-downloads
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Dovecot 2.2.16: disappearing messages, mismatched summaries, duplicated messages, excessive full re-downloads From: Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> To: dovecot at dovecot.org Date: Mon Jun 01 2015 16:47:48 GMT+0300 (Arabic Standard Time) > Alessio Cecchi skrev den 2015-06-01 15:29: >> Il 20/05/2015 10:44, David Gessel ha scritto:
2006 Jun 23
1
Running on HPUX
I've gotten fairly far into compiling and running dovecot on HPUX. The problem I'm currently having is that the index seems to be mmap'ed at twice after login. The 576 byte mmap is the index file: root at hp46t243 # grep mmap64 /tmp/dovecot.tusc [imap ][1707] mmap64(NULL, 576, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, 7, 0) = 0xc166c000 [imap ][1707] mmap64(NULL, 18432,
2008 Dec 04
1
assertion failed in 1.1.7 file mbox-sync.c: line 1305 (mbox_sync_handle_eof_updates)
Dovecot 1.1.7 is running so smoothly that I gave up checking its log files daily. :) I've just had a look, and among the usual "IMAP(username): FETCH for mailbox Sent UID xx got too little data: xx vs xx" messages (that means that unfortunately sometimes some messages are still written truncated) I saw this assertion failure: file mbox-sync.c: line 1305
2009 Oct 03
1
Another 1.2.5 imap panic
We've had another random imap process crash. This is with the original 1.2.5 imap (I haven't applied the patch for two processes creating an index simultaneously): > Oct 03 13:24:56 imap-login: Info: Login: user=<xxxxxxxx>, method=PLAIN, rip=134.225.1.46, lip=134.225.16.6 > Oct 03 13:25:59 IMAP 6067 xxxxxxxx 134.225.1.46 : Info: delete: uid=483, msgid=<xxxxxxxx> > Oct