similar to: Lots of pop3-logins

Hello, Trying to figure out how to get dovecot to startup at boot. I saw the Ubuntu script on the dovecot site, but that didn't work on my system (SuSe 10.2). Of course, copying the /usr/local/sbin/dovecot file into /etc/init.d doesn't work at all. Any one have working SuSe script?? Rodman

I have 2 SCSI disks each w/a RH 7.3 ext3 root filesystem: /dev/sdb1, and /dev/sdc1. /dev/sda1 is an old RH4.2 root filesystem. (sdb1 was created as an image of sdc1 using dd.) I have no problem booting from a SYSLINUX 1.52 floppy with SYSLINUX.CFG containing "append initrd=initrd.img root=/dev/sdb1". When I alter SYSLINUX.CFG with: "append initrd=initrd.img root=/dev/sdc1".

Hi All, I am facing a very strange issue with the pop3 server for the past one week. I run my mail service using sendmail & use UW-IMAP for POP3 & IMAP service. We have around 5000 users. Suddenly for the past one week I am facing very slow connections for POP3 alone on that server. Other services such as SMTP, IMAP, telnet, ssh etc work fine. Assuming that UW-IMAP may have an

Two VPSs. Identical setups with the exception of the extension. Same version of everything, Asterisk 14.1, Ubuntu 16.10, same firewall rules and so on - box 2 was cloned from box 1. Both VPSs run in the same datacentre. Suddenly, after weeks of OK, I'm getting lots of this on ONE box only: [Nov 4 21:23:04] NOTICE[1468]: res_hep.c:466 hep_queue_cb: Unable to send packet: Address Family

Signed-off-by: Attilio Rao <attilio.rao@citrix.com> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> --- Differences with previous revision: - Improvements to the manpage: * s/operated/made * s/compatbile/compatible * New paragraph for rombios, provided by Ian * s/force/request * redundant line removal in UEFI explanatory * Wrap of lines at 80 cols diff -r adcd6ab160fa

just for my curiosity, How can we make sure that its not affected? Is there any script to check whether its vulnerable or not (as in bash shell shock vulnerability test)? On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi> wrote: > Centos 5 is not affected by this bug, so fix is not available. > > Eero > 31.3.2015 9.48 ap. kirjoitti "Venkateswara

>On Aug 16, 2012, at 1:09 PM, "Rao, Prashantha" <Prashantha.Rao at amd.com<mailto:Prashantha.Rao at amd.com>> wrote: >Hi- >I am writing a pass to traverse loops and collect some analysis data and later on come back to transform the IR. In the analysis phase I need to >remember statistics regarding every loop in the program. What is the best way to uniquely

We are using following dtrace script to analyze an application. However we see different number of lwp_yield and yield calls reported depending on whether we trace mutex_lock or mutex_unlock or not. The number reported when we are not tracing mutex_lock or mutex_unlock is higher. What could be going on here and which one is the correct number. This is on S10 U2. Thanks, Rao.

Hi! I need to perform ANOVA on a couple of data sets. The only information I have are N, Mean and Standard deviation. I am very new to R, so can someone point me to the right direction on where to go? Thank you very much. Sincerely Niny Rao, PhD Philadelphia University

Thanks for the reply. If we want to have PV kernel for CentOs 7 , are there any guidelines to follow? How we can know before hand itself that this kernel is PV or HVM, without installing kernel? On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:27 AM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > On 8/18/2015 10:37 PM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote: > >> Thanks for the reply. >> Sorry for the

Hi All, I wanted to fix the openssl vulnerabilities (CVE-2014-3569, CVE-2014-3570, CVE-2014-3571, CVE-2014-3572) in my CentOS 5.5 and found out that 0.9.8zd has the fixes I am looking for (from the https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html link). But, When I tried to find the openssl-0.9.8zd rpm package, I did not find it in http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/updates/x86_64/RPMS/. The

Thanks for the replies. The tool that we used for testing the security vulnerability is "Nessus". I have glibc version 2.17-78.el7, I saw that CVE-2015-0235 (Ghost) is fixed in this version and I want to apply patch for the vulnerbailities CVE-2015-1472 & CVE-2015-1473. Can you please help me in finding the right version that has fixes for these? Thanks On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at

Hi, while generating the PDF file , i am getting following error.. please help for me. RuntimeError (JPEG marker not found!): C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/pdf-writer-1.1.8/lib/pdf/writer/ graphics/imageinfo.rb:176:in ` measure_JPEG'' C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/pdf-writer-1.1.8/lib/pdf/writer/ graphics/imageinfo.rb:174:in ` loop''

Hi- I am writing a pass to traverse loops and collect some analysis data and later on come back to transform the IR. In the analysis phase I need to remember statistics regarding every loop in the program. What is the best way to uniquely remember a loop? Thanks, -Prashantha -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I am using Loop pass ( runOnLoop() function ) In this function I want to access all the Loops in all the functions in the current Module the LoopInfo Pass only gives the Loops in the function where the current Loop resides :-( Is there any other Pass by which I can access the Loops in others functions as well ? ...... Regards, Shanmukha Rao -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Thanks for the reply. I did clean installation of the CentOS 7 and wanted to install the list of packages in the above mail, but couldn't get them installed. Can you please help me in installing the above packages? On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:33 AM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > On 2/9/2015 9:57 PM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote: > >> I would like to

From: Andrew Trick [mailto:atrick at apple.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 9:58 PM To: Rao, Prashantha Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] How to uniquely remember a loop? On Aug 21, 2012, at 4:17 AM, "Rao, Prashantha" <Prashantha.Rao at amd.com<mailto:Prashantha.Rao at amd.com>> wrote: More than one loop may share the same header; You have a different

Hello again, I have tons of data files that I have to decide how/which subsets to extract. While researching data mining products I came across R. As a newbie, where do I start to start using this popular tool? Any help is appreciated. Thank you in advance. Regards, Subba Rao ewbie, where do I start to start using this popular tool?<br> <br> Any help is appreciated.<br>

On Aug 21, 2012, at 4:17 AM, "Rao, Prashantha" <Prashantha.Rao at amd.com> wrote: > More than one loop may share the same header; You have a different definition of loop than the rest of the optimizer. You can identify your loops by the backedge if you prefer. > I can certainly run LoopSimplify as a prepass. But will that ensure unique loop header for each loop. It tries

Thanks for the reply. Where can we get the info regarding whether its fixed in CentOS 5 or not? I did rpm -q --changelog <glibc> | grep <CVE> but I dont find any info on this. This might means 3 things. 1. The version is not affected so no fix 2. The version is affected, still no fix 3. Fix applied, but not shown in o/p Thanks On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:06 PM, John Tall <mjtallx