similar to: mixing dovecot and non-dovecot access to mail

Hi, I have just started to get dovecot list messages which I had not been receiving until today. How can I opt out (again)? regards, Michal Szymanski On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:42:22AM +0100, Per Jessen wrote: > Aki Tuomi wrote: > >On 30.11.2018 10.03, Per Jessen wrote: > > > >>Hi AKi > >> > >>I guess my address was re-subscribed then? I was subscribed

Same problem here. I clicked the unsubscribed button, but didnt receive the email. Regards Jan On 30. 11. 18 10:50, glide3 at gmail.com wrote: > Same problem here. > > https://dovecot.org/mailman/options/dovecot-news > > Sadly the remind password button / unsubscribe email button click and claim > to send me a email but they don't. > > Assume its due a high

As pointed out already by several emails before, a) mail to dovecot-unsubscribe at dovecot.org (which will unsubscribe instead of temporarily disable delivery) b) go to https://https://dovecot.org/mailman/listinfo/dovecot and click unsubscribe, don't change your delivery options to notmail. Aki > On 30 November 2018 at 11:46 Michal Szymanski <msz at astrouw.edu.pl> wrote: >

Same problem here. https://dovecot.org/mailman/options/dovecot-news Sadly the remind password button / unsubscribe email button click and claim to send me a email but they don't. Assume its due a high mailq with the amount of messages that need to go out? Regards Rory -----Original Message----- From: dovecot <dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org> On Behalf Of Michal Szymanski Sent:

Hello, I have a freshly setup postfix/dovecot mail server (after a server upgrade I decided to change my sendmail/popper conf to something more modern :) It mostly works, there is no problem in sending/receiving mails in local network, both using text clients like mutt or pine dealing with the incoming/outcoming mail directly. Also dovecot works fine with SSL authentication from the outside

On 30.11.2018 10.03, Per Jessen wrote: > Aki Tuomi wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> It seems we accidentically had a high amount of subscribers >> temporarily disabled due to DMARC on some sender's host. We have now >> taken actions to prevent this in the future and all temporarily >> disabled members have been restored. >> >> Aki > Hi AKi >

pv-grub is also the best/only way to run hurd under xen: http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/microkernel/mach/gnumach/ports/xen.html#index4h1 it's also the best way by far to run netbsd without a separate /boot Cheers, Brian Szymanski -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Since upgrading from dovecot-2.1.rc1 to dovecot-2.1.rc3, some clients are showing a .subscriptions file in the user's mbox path as a folder. Some clients such as T'bird on Mac OS X create this file listing subscribed mbox files. Other clients such as T'bird on Windows XP show this file as a folder in the folder list even though it cannot be accessed as a folder (dovecot returns CANNOT

The following shows up in the "orphaned page" list of the Wiki: http://wiki.dovecot.org/MboxLocking?action=show&redirect=MboxSoftwareLocks Does the description of Dovecot mbox locking still apply to current versions? If yes, it should be linked from the "Troubleshooting" page. -- Jim Garrison (jhg at acm.org) PGP Keys at http://www.jhmg.net RSA 0x04B73B7F DH 0x70738D88

Hi, I have a problem with ''tc filter'' on a 2.4.22 kernel from Slackware 9.1 distribution. The tc command binary is from htb3.6-020525.tgz (http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb) I''m trying the following command sequence: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 1 r2q 1 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1200kbit ceil 1200kbit tc class add dev

I have Dovecot 1.0 in trial use by the IT staff, and have some locking questions Background, the mail server runs procmail, sendmail and NFS exports the user homedir and mailbox to a) a login shell host and b) a mailing list services host. It runs UWIMAP on the usual ports and dovecot on a arbitrary port number. Because of concern with NFS and file access contention. I have the following

Pursuing some rpm verify errors exposed while investigating my T'bird/FF problem, a prelink -am gives this, and other, error. prelink: /usr/lib/esc-1.0.0/xulrunner/xulrunner-bin: Could not find one of the dependencies Ran # ldd /usr/lib/esc-1.0.0/xulrunner/xulrunner-bin|grep 'not found' libmozjs.so => not found libxpcom.so => not found libxul.so =>

Hello, I've noticed a strange delay while booting a CentOS 7 guest on a CentOS 7 host with slow disks (7200RPM) with write cache off. The guest and host are freshly installed Centos 7 (host was fully patched before guest install). Guest is installed on an lvm pool residing on an md raid1 with two SATA 7200 RPM drives with their write caches off. The delay is on mounting /boot, the dmesg

PXELinux from a DHCP server - read the docs - couldnt be simpler. I'm afraid its beaten me, no matter what I do I always get the same result at the client side "PXE-E53: No boot file found" For the life of me I cannot see what I'm doing wrong and would appreciate any assistance in trying to diag. RedHat 7.3 - (I know its old but I have to accomodate other dependancies) dhcp

On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 12:08:00 +0200 Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > How do you deliver then mails to the server? > > also mbox is very unoptimised mailbox format for this. Each time mail is deleted from mbox mailbox the whole mbox while needs to be rewritten to remove the mail. OpenSMTPD and Dovecot run on the same machine. OpenSMTPD receives incoming mails and

>> symptoms: >> 1. Coming back to the idle client, and clicking on a newly arrived >> message, often a long delay (seems like minutes, sometimes) will >> occur before the message loads from the server. >> 2. Sending messages, as often as not, the client will stall, >> sometimes indefinitely, on "copying message to sent folder". >> >

Yesterday, did the following. Two lockups since then. Recent freetype had just cured some anomalies and now this. One lock while I slept, the other a few moments ago while active at the KB. Had Evolution, Firefox and T'bird open among two users on a single X console. No unusual stuff. Desktop install, fully up-to-date 4.3, i386 (Athalon). 1) see anything wrong below? 2) I'm seriously

Might have some kind of bug here. I want to know if anybody else is seeing this. It's happened twice now, so I should be able to repeat it. $ rpm -q centos-release centos-release-5-2.el5.centos On my desktop, I "su -" to another user. Then "nohup thunderbird", it gets the mail and plays the announcement. ISTM this is an error right off the bat as this user is not the

Hi, all. I have been playing with the notion of migrating some of my folders to maildir because it's a lot easier to manage that way from a reader standpoint. The big question I have is how do I maintain message ordering in each folder? When I use a mail program to do the migration from mbox to maildir, selecting "order received ascending", it works nicely, but one very small

This is what I'm seeing on my DHCP server: # tcpdump -i eth0 -vvv -s 1500 '(port 67 or port 68)' tcpdump: listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 1500 bytes 13:24:05.679950 IP (tos 0x0, ttl? 20, id 0, offset 0, flags [none], proto: UDP (17), length: 576) 0.0.0.0.bootpc > 255.255.255.255.bootps: [udp sum ok] BOOTP/DHCP, Request from 00:24:54:d9:d4:2f (oui