similar to: Mailbox isn't a valid mbox file

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Mailbox isn't a valid mbox file"

2005 Dec 01
1
mbox separators ignored
Using dovecot-0.99.13-4.FC2 I grabbed a bunch of Mailman archive files from the Weather mailing list here: <http://www.buoy.com/pipermail/weather/> I gunzipped the older ones, then concatenated them all in correct order to create one big mbox file. I dropped it into my ~/mail folder and started my IMAP client (Mulberry) and opened the new Weather folder. It shows one gargantuan
2006 Aug 18
0
dovecot Digest, Vol 40, Issue 65
Dear Tim Schafer, Take a look at my sample dovecot-ldap.conf hosts = localhost dn = cn=root,dc=ceylonlinux,dc=com dnpass = secret ldap_version = 3 base = dc=ceylonlinux,dc=com deref = never scope = subtree user_attrs = mail,homeDirectory=mailMessageStore,uidNumber=1003,gidNumber=1003 user_filter = (&(objectClass=user)(mail=%u)) pass_attrs = mail=user,userPassword=password pass_filter =
2006 Aug 16
1
Mailbox isn't a valid mbox file (dovecot 1.0-0.beta8.2.fc5)
Hello, I have upgraded my dovecot-0.99.13-3.FC3 to dovecot-1.0-0.beta8.2.fc5 recently and now am having weird problem. If somebody's mailbox has the first line in a form of From "User Name" <user at host.domain.edu> Thu Oct 7 14:20:00 1999 instead of From user at host.domain.edu Thu Oct 7 14:20:00 1999 then that mailbox couldn't be precessed by dovecot. It
2006 Apr 10
0
Missing X-IMAPbase header causing mbox corruption
If the first message in an mbox is deleted by an external program, therefore removing the X-IMAPbase header, an error such as the following occurs. Apr 9 20:10:51 sm1 dovecot: imap(306812): file mbox-sync-update.c: line 460 (mbox_sync_update_header_from): assertion failed: (ctx->mail.uid == 0 || ctx->mail.uid_broken || ctx->mail.uid == mail->uid) This prevents the user from logging
2006 Aug 17
2
dovecot mbox to dovecot maildir migration
Hi, I'm migrating accounts from one server with dovecot mbox and pam nss-ldap authentication to a new server with dovecot maildir and mysql auth (no posix accounts). My problem is the pop3 uidl format on the two servers are different, even though I'm using pop3_uidl_format = %08Xu%08Xv in both configs, I'm always re-downloading left messages on my test runs. Is there a way I could
2005 Jul 22
0
Bug in 0.99.14 mbox handling - mail UIDs are renumbered without bumping UIDVALIDITY
Package: dovecot-imapd Version: 0.99.14-1 Severity: important Hi, I think I've identified a bug in Dovecot 0.99.14 as packaged and distributed by Debian Sarge. I believe the bug lies in the original Dovecot source, not with any modifications made by Debian. Specifically, this bug deals with Dovecot's handling of message unique identifiers (UIDs) for IMAP clients when using the mbox
2008 May 08
5
MBOX to Maildir preserving the UIDL (outlook-tested, no redownloading)
TESTED AND RUNNING, MIGRATING from MBOX to MAILDIR, PRESERVE UID and OUTLOOK sees the email as downloaded. I hope this helps a lot of people out there. Feel free to post this somewhere else too. By: Horn Wijaya (hwijaya at nodens.biz) 8th May 2008 I have been searching for weeks for a foolproof method to migrate all my users mbox to maildir/dovecot without having the pain of downloading
2005 Apr 09
1
dovecot and evolution
I am using dovecot 0.99.13 and Evolution 2.0.2 on Fedora Core 3. Recently, Ximian stopped being able to access my local INBOX via IMAP, failing with the following error: Error while Opening folder imap://malsyned at localhost/INBOX. Incomplete server response: no information provided for message 1. I got a transcript of the conversation between Evolution and dovecot. The relavent section
2012 Jun 26
1
Wrong headers in dovecot-crlf
Hello everyone, I'm using the very good imaptest [0] tool to test my little imap server implementation. I've tried to use the dovecot-crlf [1] file, but it looks like there are some major issues : $ grep -n "In-Reply-To.*;" tests/data/dovecot-crlf 479:In-Reply-To: <20020806175441.GA7148 at linux.taugt.net>; from rueckert at informatik.uni-rostock.de on Tue, Aug 06, 2002
2005 Nov 16
2
Mailbox isn't a valid mbox file
Hello all, I have a new installation of Fedora 4 and Dovecot 1.4.Alpha4 A small percentage of my users are getting unable to pop mail from a client (ie: Outlook), they get continually prompted for username/password. The error they get is: Mailbox isn't a valid mbox file. When I look in the file, I don't see anything unusual. There's not much info on the Internet about this
2015 Jun 08
0
Dovecot mbox & other programs
On 2015-06-06 19:01:29 +0200, Pali Roh?r wrote: > I want to use dovecot as imap server with mbox storage format (described > at [1]) but I also want to access (and modify!) those mbox files which > are stored on server (and used by dovecot). > > What is correct way to read those mboxes? From wiki page [1] I read that > I should ignore first message in mbox (which contains
2015 Jun 08
0
Dovecot mbox & other programs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 06-06-15 19:01, Pali Roh?r wrote: > Hello, > > I want to use dovecot as imap server with mbox storage format > (described at [1]) but I also want to access (and modify!) those > mbox files which are stored on server (and used by dovecot). > > What is correct way to read those mboxes? From wiki page [1] I read > that I
2015 Jun 09
0
Dovecot mbox & other programs
On Tuesday 09 June 2015 08:44:06 Charles Marcus wrote: > On 6/9/2015 8:36 AM, Charles Marcus <CMarcus at Media-Brokers.com> wrote: > > On 6/8/2015 5:11 PM, Pali Roh??r <pali.rohar at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Still I want read/write access to storage and want to use mbox as > >> storage (also for easier backup and copy)... > >> > >> And my
2015 Jun 06
6
Dovecot mbox & other programs
Hello, I want to use dovecot as imap server with mbox storage format (described at [1]) but I also want to access (and modify!) those mbox files which are stored on server (and used by dovecot). What is correct way to read those mboxes? From wiki page [1] I read that I should ignore first message in mbox (which contains X-IMAPbase header) and mbox file is in mboxcl2 format. And what is
2005 Nov 10
0
dovecot dead but subsys locked
I'm running dovecot 20051026 version on Redhat4. I tried to do a stress test. However dovecot dies after I login a few hundred users. I have some error messages in my mail log and am not sure if they are related to the problem. [root at lms2 imap1505]# service dovecot status dovecot dead but subsys locked Nov 10 12:58:52 lms2 dovecot: imap1514 [IMAP 7593]: mbox sync: UID inserted in the
2013 Sep 24
1
imaptest-20130617 seems to be reporting spurious header changes
I'm trying to use this to test an IMAP server I'm developing (I picked the nightly up from the link on the wiki page at http://www.imapwiki.org/ImapTest/Installation). With one client using the mailbox dovecot-crlf (http://www.dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-crlf) I get messages like: Error: test at npsl.co.uk[67]: 1035253882.5041.34.camel at hurina: Header From changed 'Timo Sirainen
2005 Jul 21
1
deleting folders containing subfolders with thunderbird (mbox format) bug
When using Thunderbird (dovecot-0.99.13-3.FC3) on Fedora connecting to dovecot-0.99.13-3.FC3 I am having problems deleting folders which have been created with the 'Allow your new folder to contain: Folders only' option picked. The folder appears to get deleted but upon restarting Thunderbird the folder still appears to be there but clicking on it I get the error: 'The current
2004 Dec 21
1
Mixing mbox and maildir
Is there some way to add a maildir folder to a mbox hierarchy? My folders are all mbox, but I want to migrate some client-side mail from a client (PMMail2000) that stores messages as individual files, and it might be easiest just to dump all the files into a maildir directory with suitable naming.
2004 Jan 10
3
Domain group not working in valid users
Using samba-3.0.0-15 on Fedora Core 1. I have a group "Electronics Testing" on my Win2k AD server and added this to a share in my smb.conf: valid users = @"electronics testing" A user in this group is unable to connect. A local user added to valid users is able to connect, so other share settings look ok. I see this in the log: [2004/01/09 13:38:00, 10]
2007 Dec 14
0
1.08 + quota-rewrite has no trash plugin
I think I'm just going to move to 1.1 - however, I'm not keen on installing all the dev tools necessary on a production box. Does anyone have any pointers to web pages or keywords I can check to see what kind of safeguards are needed. The problem I have is building the the srpm to include the quota-rewrite with the trash plugin. I think it has been removed and I wanted to check if anyone