similar to: LAYOUT=fs vs LAYOUT=maildir++ and quota

Hello everyone. I'm having a problem with convert-tool while trying to convert mbox folders to maildir. I'm running dovecot-1.1.16 on Centos 5.3 If the user has subfolders, convert-tool fails saying: "Mailbox conversion: Couldn't create mailbox sub/folder3: Invalid mailbox name" However, if I ran the convert-tool with the same arguments and same folders with dovecot

Hello everyone. I'm new to dovecot and I'm setting up a server for one domain only. I have not yet decided whether I will be using one uid per user or one uid for all of them. What are the steps for correctly setting up shared folders with acls if I choose one uid per user? What advantages or disadvantages has setting one uid for all users vs one uid per user, considering I wish to

> Sounds more like you just introduced a new self-created problem that would require yet another workaround.. ;-) Definitely wrong. Appending .dir to directories and .folder to folder files keeps files completely distinct and name collissions are not possible. > But what was not clear from your mail, is what exactly you identified as "the problems" with standard Maildir++

Dear All, can I use Maildir++ Layout for private namespace and fs-layout for public namespace on the same server, provided that the hierarchy separator is the same (.)? Are all parts of dovecot (especially deliver, sieve and lmtp) compatible with fs-layout? Are there any restrictions I have to obey? - Chris

Hi, I am trying to deal with the problem, that under regular mbox format a path can lead to either a file or a directory, but not both, while under IMAP, a path is usually both, a message folder containing subfolders. I found dovecot's approach to this problem, the Maildir++ layout described under http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MboxChildFolders , and was astonished to see, what problems come with

Whilst documenting LAYOUT=maildir++ under dbox, that got me thinking: Can we specify :LAYOUT=maildir++ with mbox? If I have it right, this should then remove the problem of not being able to have messages and mail subfolders in the same mail folder. So for example if we had mail location specified as: mail_location = mbox:~/mail:LAYOUT=maildir++ we would have files: ~/mail/inbox - file

Hi everyone, I''m Ezequiel from Buenos Aires. I''m new in this list, so please forgive me if my questions are not the correct one''s fro this alias. I''m working as a campus ambassador in Sun, while finishing my engineer degree, creating communities around opensolaris in Argentina. I discovered this project, and this group, looking for something that I could

I have installed on a VirtualBox vm the crossbow ISO Now I''m trying to create the network map described in the "getting started" pdf I have this situation: On global zone, I have the real NIC: e1000g0 with ip 10.0.2.15 (VirtualBox NAT this IP, I can get web access with it) I have created an etherstub (etherstub n?2) with 2 vnics (vnic5 and vnic6), I''ve plumbed

Hello, I'm using dovecot 1.2.10 with mbox format (which implies layout=fs) and I would like to switch to maildir++ layout without changing format in order to implement subfolders for IMAP users. I understand that I should move the INDEX location to avoid some namespace conflict (it would be a good idea anyway: I'll move them on another disc :). Now I have mail_location =

Hi folks! I'm having some trouble replicating a domain. I followed the steps in this guide: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC I followed the steps and everything worked fine for me. but... If I make changes on the PDC, these changes are replicated to the Secondary DC, but if I make changes to the Secondary, these are not seen in the PDC. Is there any way

On 2018-10-01 04:07, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Listescape?maybe? It should be mentioned somehow that one can't just change the hierarchy separator on the fly (without manual changes to the fs). If you used . as the separator, it would look this in the filesystem: .testfolder.sub1 Now you change the separator to $. Your mail client will see the existing

Hi people, I have a print server using Debian, LPRNG and SAMBA working without any problems. Now I 'm trying to set up a new server with CentOS 6, CUPS and SAMBA. It 's a very simple setup: a few local users and a few printers, nothing special. The clients also map the printer using 'net use lpt1 \\mainserver\printerX' because they need to print over an old DOS application.

Hi Group, I am sending my question again why I don't have answer yet: I am developing a application, this use "Manager API" to connect with Asterisk. But when I call to an external number (over a zap channel), I don't receive any event when the target answer, Who can help me?, Which event notify me that the phone call was answered? Thank you. Ezequiel -------------- next

> In the homepage said that dovecot doesn't yet support maildir++, but in > http://dovecot.org/doc/mail-storages.txt said 'we support maildir++'. > > My question is: does dovecot support maildir++ ? > > Regards > mike

Hi, I've been bitten by an issue running Squirrelmail on top of Dovecot using Maildir++ quotas. Having configured these quotas in Dovecot, I notice that Dovecot appears not to exclude the 'Trash' folder from its quota calculation (which it should do, according to the Maildir++ spec). Unfortunately this breaks Squirrelmail if I try to delete a message from a close-to-quota

Yes, I have still inbox mbox format because I have sendmail delivering there. I trying to migrate/convert step by step, with least possible impact for users. -----Original Message----- From: Aki Tuomi Sent: dinsdag 14 mei 2019 6:19 To: Marc Roos; Marc Roos via dovecot Subject: Re: Userdb userdb_mail=, error Mailbox list driver maildir++: maildir_name not supported by this driver > On

Hi Matias, thanks for this patch! Since this patch only concerns virtio_transport, I'd use the 'vsock/virtio' prefix in the commit title: "vsock/virtio: add support for MSG_PEEK" Some comments below: On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 05:48:27PM +0000, Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen wrote: > This patch adds support for MSG_PEEK. In such a case, packets are not > removed from the

Hi to all, I am semi-new to the dovecot system, but i like it very much for the versatility of all the system. I have a problem: i am migrating my servers from postfix with vda patch + courier imap to dovecot. All works fine, except for one thing: i use Maildir++ format, but i don't know how to make the file maildirsize into the home of the users. This file is needed by me becouse i have a

This patch adds support for MSG_PEEK. In such a case, packets are not removed from the rx_queue and credit updates are not sent. Signed-off-by: Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen <matiasevara at gmail.com> --- net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c

This patch adds support for MSG_PEEK. In such a case, packets are not removed from the rx_queue and credit updates are not sent. Signed-off-by: Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen <matiasevara at gmail.com> --- net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c