Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "Multiple Dovecot instances over single mail store"
2010 Aug 31
1
Dovecot 1.x and 2.x on the same machine ?
Hello
Would it be possible to run two instances of Dovecot
in order to test V 2 on the SAME machine that runs V 1
One Dovecot 1.x instance on std TCP ports
One Dovecot 2.x instance on custom TCP ports and custom directories
Thanks
2012 Jun 07
1
Authentication issue
Hi,
I need to set up a weird dovecot configuration:
1) outside a ssl tunnel I'd like to authenticate only with cram-md5 scheme
2) inside a ssl tunnel I'd like to authenticate only with plain auth
The first is easily satisfied with
auth_mechanisms = plain cram-md5
disable_plaintext_auth = yes
but I don't know how to satisfy the second condition, if it's possible.
Thanks for
2009 Oct 06
1
dovecot 1.2.5 - can't create auth listener
Hi. I have version 1.1.11 working fine with multiple servers. When I upgrade
to 1.2.4 or 1.2.5 I keep getting an error 'can't create auth listener'
(address in use)
I have two ip addresses (lets call them 1.0.0.1 and 1.0.0.2).
Each ip address has it's own certificate and set of servers with custom
ports. I don't know how the configuration is supposed to work and it was a
lot
2008 Dec 08
3
"nopassword" extra field useless with LDAP passdb
Hi,
We are trying to implement a highly secure mail server with user authentication restricted to SSL certificates only (not using passwords at all). Still, user information is stored in a LDAP directory. In this configuration LDAP is used to check whether the user is registered (and probably supply quota and other info), and actual authentication is done by SSL layer.
According to wiki, a
2019 Jul 14
2
New improved version of nut-report script
Roger, I just tried the journal report and it is unable to find
journalctl on my system. I am not very expert but this MAY be because my
Ubuntu install is actually running chroot'ed on an Android TV computer
and the expected systemd may not be there. Could the desired information
be elsewhere? Thanks!
On 7/14/2019 7:52 AM, Roger Price wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2019, Charles Lepple wrote:
2001 Dec 17
1
sftp-server questions
Hello,
Is there any way to specify which pubkey has rights to use the
sftp-server subsytem when this has been set up in the sshd server?
I don't know if I could control which users are authorized to use the
sftp-server, could I?
Is there any official patch that allows sftp-sessions 'chroot'ed?
Thanks in advance.
--
Best regards,
quart mailto:quart at
2006 Feb 04
1
Recommendations for securing a webserver
Hello,
We're migrating a webserver from RedHat 7.x to CentOS 4.2. In the process,
we'd like to improve security.
We're currently planning on making sure SELinux is enabled, mounting the /tmp
partition noexec, and running PHP in safe mode, hide_errors on,
register_globals off by default.
vsftpd is set to chroot logins.
I've seen Apache run inside a chroot jail, but that
2015 Oct 09
2
CentOS-6 SSHD chroot SELinux problem
I run a sshd host solely to allow employees to tunnel secure
connections to our internal hosts. Some of which do not support
encrypted protocols. These connections are chroot'ed via the
following in /etc/ssh/sshd_config
Match Group !wheel,!xxxxxx,yyyyy
AllowTcpForwarding yes
ChrootDirectory /home/yyyyy
X11Forwarding yes
Where external users belong to group yyyyy (primary).
We
2017 May 02
1
Problem with Pigeonhole/Sieve
Hi Steffen,
248 is a dovecot, 202 is dovenull, both users are in theirs groups
across. If I change ownership of /usr/local/dovecot to dovecot.dovecot,
then dovecot is correcting it to root.root for some reason. Does it mean
that dovecot should be running as root only?
What does it mean / here? is it / in filesystem or it is / for dovecot
in /usr/local/dovecot ?
May 01 14:36:00 master:
2002 Mar 11
1
scp completes but ssh subprocess in deadlock with sshd
I've just built openssh 3.1 for my Redhat 5.1 system (running on a 486
DX-66) using the latest zlib and openssl libraries.
Connecting to the machine with ssh seems to work fine (although it takes a
while to initiate a connection).
But when I transfer a file to the machine with scp, it seems to work fine
and the scp completes, but an ssh sub-process remains behind on the client
and an sshd
2004 Dec 18
1
More on Lazy loading errors building its package in a chroot
From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
> I now have the package built in a chroot -- but at the price of setting
> 'LazyLoad: no' in DESCRIPTION.
>
> I do not quite understand why that is needed. Can someone else help? I can
> provide the following pointers for its-1.0.4
>
I have had problems on Windows in which I had to pay the
same price and it turned out
2007 Dec 28
1
problems using --ignore-existing and filter rules
Greetings everyone,
I have a problem which I believe is a collision between the
--ignore-existing option and filter rules. It appears to me that
regardless of argument order, when I specify the two on a command
line, even if a non-existing directory appears in the filter list as a
protect rule. But when I change protect rules to exclude rules, the
excluded files/directories appear not to be
2014 Jul 23
2
Multiple servers and NFS
Hi all,
For some reason, I didn't go to http://wiki2.dovecot.org/NFS until now,
and I'm starting to get worried ...
The plan was to have multple servers (MXes) receiving mail, and
delivering via LMTP to multiple backend dovecot servers (with amavis in
front of dovecot; LMTP both sides). Then we'd have multiple servers for
clients to use IMAP or POP3.
This is more or less how the
2007 Oct 25
0
Quota inside chroot environment
Hi List,
I have users chroot'ed on a CentOS 5 server. They should be able to check
their current disk usage with the quota command. Basically, it works -
however, there are some drawbacks I hope someone can help me on:
In order for the user to access the aquota.user file I hard-linked it into
the users root. Unfortunately the users do not 'see' any changes in disk
usage until
2015 Oct 08
0
Samba AD PDC , LDAP and Single-Sign-On
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015, Mark Foley wrote:
> On Oct 8 2015 09:32 Rowlan Penny wrote:
>
>> It might help if you were to explain just what you require from single-sign-on ?
>
> Well, perhaps I'm mistaken, but is this not the #1 reason to install Samba4?
> From reading this list over the past couple of months it does not seem that
> Authenticating users on Windows workstations
2001 Mar 01
1
Bug report against openssh-2.3.0p1
I am writing to report a bug in openssh-2.3.0p1, and to suggest
a fix.
I have OpenSSH installed on a Solaris 8 box. The output of
uname -a is:
> SunOS dipper.csi.cam.ac.uk 5.8 Generic_108528-06 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10
OpenSSH was configured with the following options:
> ./configure --prefix=/jackdaw --with-default-path=/jackdaw/bin:/usr/bin
On this OS, with this configuration, it
2015 Aug 07
4
Using a separate passdb per service
Situation: one front-facing server running Dovecot as IMAP/POP3/
ManageSieve proxy, a mixture of IMAP servers (Dovecot, Exchange, ...)
in the back-end. Dovecot's passdb does lookups against MySQL which
contains a simple user/host mapping, the actual authentication happens
on the back-end IMAP servers. The configuration is more or less as
described here:
2007 Jun 14
1
How do I test new code?
I know how to run a second instance of the *base* code (to check
different functionality/config) and documented it in
http://wiki.dovecot.org/RunningDovecot
What I realize I don't know how to do is to run an altogether different
version or build of the code as that second instance, which would be
good to have to check out upgrades before they go into production.
While I could do a build
2009 Oct 14
1
pop3-login process
Hi,
I would like to know if the pop3-login process would be
create
more than one while a user connection is established.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/RunningDovecot
------------------------------------
imap-login and pop3-login processes handle new IMAP and
POP3 connections until user has logged in.
------------------------------------
I'm sorry to ask you this kind of question...
Regards,
2009 Apr 30
2
ChrootDirectory %h
Hi,
many people are having problems using SFTP with ChrootDirectory when the
jail directory (or the path above) is not owned by root. The question is
if chroot'ing to usual home directories can be allowed, even though they
are owned by regular users.
I know that this topic has been discussed on the list several times now,
so I searched the list archives for posts that invalidate the