similar to: Nested folders in FS supported yet?

Hi, I am Chandramouli from India. I have successfully implemented Intercom (Dialling within my office LAN) and Voicemail features using Asterisk. To implement this, I am using X-Lite Softphone. Now, I wish to make calls to US using VoIP Asterisk. I dont think I need any external hardware to implement pure VoIP solution. Here I am sending my configuration file values: Contents of

Hi Friends, I have successfully implemented Intercom, Voicemail and International dialing using Asterisk. Now I want to connect my PSTN Lines to Asterisk server. I have 3 PSTN number (lines) to connect to Asterisk. For this, I want to use Sipura SPA-2100. Is my decession is correct or not? Is there any disadvantages with this Sipura SPA-2100? Please tell me. Thank you. Regards, Chandramouli

Hi Friends, At present, I am using VoIPJET.COM provider for make calls to USA. I have two doubts. 1) I am unable to make call to UK Mobile phone. Why? 2) I want to make calls to "Turkey" country from "India". With VoIPJET, I am unable to make call to "Turkey" and unable to find VoIP provider for Turkey. Please tell me VoIP Provider for Turkey from India.

On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 10:05 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 08:31:34PM -0700, Sudeep Dutt wrote: > > From: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com> > > > > This patch introduces the host "Virtio over PCIe" interface for > > Intel MIC. It allows creating user space backends on the host and > > instantiating virtio

On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 10:05 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 08:31:34PM -0700, Sudeep Dutt wrote: > > From: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com> > > > > This patch introduces the host "Virtio over PCIe" interface for > > Intel MIC. It allows creating user space backends on the host and > > instantiating virtio

Hi, I have 2 text files , the first one looks like this : CC: " some statements" this is followed by 10-12 lines in the similar pattern and then the next line is a comment and from the 14th line all the columns are aligned and the variable values are filled in .... The next file is a text file with 3 columns with column names and the 2 files have the same number of

Hello, Alex > for generating C++ records. I was hoping for something that would allow me > to specify my target machine (more inline with what GCC does) and then just > stand back and watch the target code be generated. I guess a deeper > understanding of Target classes is mandatory before proceeding to use > TableGen. That's true. TableGen can automate many important cases,

Dear Community, I have a problem I am trying to code in R. Suppose there are 7 products and each have a ROI value attached to it. There are 400 representatives who calls 150,000 customers with these product detailing and achieve sales through the calls. There is a cost per call and revenue earned from the call. Constraint is revenue should be greater than the cost. Now there can be at most 7

When using the IDCT routines, the C version [ lib/idct.c: oc_idct8x8_c(ogg_int16_t _y[64],int _last_zzi)] in libtheora 1.1.1, the decoded image is garbled. Is it functionally equivalent to the MMX optimized version [lib/x86/mmxidct.c: oc_idct8x8_mmx(ogg_int16_t _y[64],int _last_zzi)] ? I used some of the Theora video files from here: http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/List_of_Theora_videos for

This patch enables the following: a) Initializes the Intel MIC X100 PCIe devices. b) Provides sysfs entries for family and stepping information. Co-author: Dasaratharaman Chandramouli <dasaratharaman.chandramouli at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Caz Yokoyama <Caz.Yokoyama at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dasaratharaman

This patch enables the following: a) Initializes the Intel MIC X100 PCIe devices. b) Provides sysfs entries for family and stepping information. Co-author: Dasaratharaman Chandramouli <dasaratharaman.chandramouli at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Caz Yokoyama <Caz.Yokoyama at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dasaratharaman

Hi Greg, I understand your frustration. I've been on this mailing list for a little over a year hoping that by osmosis I could get a a better handle on writing a back end for LLVM. Although I feel more comfortable with the nomenclature, I still do not have a clue as to how to begin (actually I do, but it sounds more dramatic saying it this way). I've read the documentation, but

I have 3 years of experience with R and have an interest in becoming a better programmer so that I might someday be able to contribute packages. Other than R, my only experience was taking Lisp from Daniel Friedman in the 1970's. I would like to learn either C or C++ for several reasons: To gain a better concept of object oriented programming so that I can begin to use S4 methods in R. To

I've just pushed out a 6.00-pre1 release. This release includes support for booting EFI machines. The code is currently in the alpha stage. Having said that, you should expect most things to work correctly, including things like the graphical menu. Please help test if you can, and if you find any bugs, please report them. To facilitate building different versions of syslinux.efi (32-bit and

We have a few unfinished examples in our code of the form it "should and does do something" do # stuff end it "should do something someday" it "should and does do something else" do # more stuff end Now since I upgraded my gem to rspec 1.8 today, the empty example is failing with the error ArgumentError in "should do something someday":

I see this has been asked a few times over the years (but not in several years), and the response was along the lines of "maybe someday", so I figured I'd see if someday was here yet... I have a need to have a different default realm for different listeners. Basically, I've a bunch of different domains, and a few of them insist their users not be required to authenticate with

Hi Timo, Are there any plans to support the SIZE option in the lmtp server? Paul

struct timespec64 has unused bits in the tv_nsec field that can be used for other purposes. In future patches, we're going to change how the inode->i_ctime is accessed in certain inodes in order to make use of them. In order to do that safely though, we'll need to eradicate raw accesses of the inode->i_ctime field from the kernel. Add new accessor functions for the ctime that we can

Hi, all, Is the Xen currently compatible with the InfiniBand? I found some information about the Smart I/O module, but it was posted in 2006. Is the module still maintained? Or, are there any up-to-date alternatives for that? Many thanks, Chiu _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

>> 3. I'm intrested in blocking kazaa/P2P trafic with IPFW any help in this issue you could possibly block connections at known p2p ports. deny tcp from any to any 6699 step but most of the newer protocols use dynamic ports and in turn, are configurable. so ipfw isn't exactly ideal on it's own for this. -r. -----Original Message----- From: Pons [mailto:pons@gmx.li] Sent: