similar to: locals within a partial

Hi, folks. I've started getting these errors from rsync, and any help would be appreciated: >ERROR: out of memory in string_area_new buffer >rsync error: error allocating core memory buffers (code 22) at util.c(115) >ERROR: out of memory in string_area_new buffer >rsync error: error allocating core memory buffers (code 22) at util.c(115) >ERROR: out of memory in

Greetings. In testing an rsync backup script I'd created, I made a mistake and aborted the running script with a ctrl-C keyboard interrupt. The command that was running at the time was as follows: ${RSYNC_CMD} -aNHAXx --protect-args --fileflags --force-change --rsync-path="/usr/local/bin/rsync" <username>@<my.server.com>:${CPY_SRC} ${CPY_DEST} The expected data

Hello again, I encountered something amazing. First I thought there is not enough memory allowed through ulimit. ulimit is now set to (almost) 512MB but rsync still gets out fo memory at 8MB. Can anyone tell me why? That's my configuration: rsync version 2.6.2 from AIX 5.3 to SuSE Linux 9 (also has rsync 2.6.2) ulimit -a (AIX) ulimit -a AIX (source): -------------------------

Dear R Users, I have 120 objects stored in R's memory and I want to pass the names of these many objects to be held as just one single object. The naming convention is month, year in sequence for all months between January 1986 to December 1995 (e.g. Jan86, Feb86, Mar86... through to Dec95). I hope to pass all these names (and their data I guess) to an object called file_list, however,

As those of you who watch CVS will be aware Wayne has been making progress in reducing memory requirements of rsync. Much of what he has done has been the product of discussions between he and myself that started a month ago with John Van Essen. Most recently Wayne has changed how the file_struct and its associated data are allocated, eliminating the string areas. Most of these changes have been

How do I do the following: if a user is logged in, then opens another browser tab and logs in again (either as himself or as someone else), I want to invalidate the session in the first tab and throw up a "logged in from another browser window" screen. RIght now, user1''s session silently becomes a duplicate user2 session instead (from what I understand, sessions are bound to

Keir, This would also be appropriate for 3.1.0, since the /usr/lib fix makes pygrub work on ia64 Presently pygrub only looks in /efi/redhat/elilo.conf. It should check for other distributions, plus a couple fallback locations. Signed-off-by: Aron Griffis <aron@hp.com> diff -r 6d64f9eefad5 -r 67df28389f46 tools/pygrub/src/pygrub --- a/tools/pygrub/src/pygrub Wed May 02 14:50:56 2007

Hi, Rsync 3.0.5 on both sides. receiver is Open Solaris and sender is Linux. I got a nested directory - relatively depth but still it should work. It fails instead. sending daemon args: --server --sender -vvlWHogDtpre.is --ignore-errors --numeric-ids --inplace . TEST/ receiving incremental file list delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file [...] overflow: xflags=0x7a

I have many files in 1 directory, file names end in .txt. Each file has 2 columns col1 col2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 I want to make a list of the file names and iterate through each plotting them in a separate file $filename\.png with the png swapped for txt. So far I have this, can someone help fill in the blanks? Thank You! file_list <- list.files() ? for (file in file_list){ ?????? ? ?

Hi all, I wish to merge 24 .csv files, each having a common identifier-column ("Name") and do two things: 1. Retrieve the common one's. [Analogy: while merging 2-dataframes, similar to using: merge (.... ,by="Name", all=FALSE) ] 2. Retrieve all, i.e., the union of the rows of 24 files. [again, somthing like: merge (.... ,by="Name", all=TRUE) ] On the web,

Some of the debug messages that rsync outputs (when verbose >= 2) can occur on both sides of the connection. This makes it hard to know which program is saying what. Some debug messages deal with this by outputting a "[PID]" string at the start of the message. Unfortunately, the startup message that tells us which pid is which is only output when verbose >= 3, so there's a

Platform: Compaq OpenVMS Alpha 7.3 Compiler: Compaq C T6.5 The following patch is an update to a previous patch that I submitted. The only change from the previous patch is that the const qualifier has been added to write_batch_*() routines to improve compiler efficiency. Because the gdiff -u was done against the distribution it includes the previous patch. The functions with no parameters

Hi All I run rsync in an automated environment and it sometime will crash and leave a core dump file. from core dump, gdb shows that gdb) bt #0 add_dirs_to_tree (parent_ndx=-1, from_flist=0x56c590, dir_cnt=1) at flist.c:1422 #1 0x0000000000409eab in send_file_list (f=16, argc=-1, argv=0x56c238) at flist.c:2068 #2 0x0000000000419052 in client_run (f_in=16, f_out=16, pid=-1, argc=1,

I want to set my app up to prevent multiple simultaneous logins by the same user. What strategies are people using? Is it worth going to database session storage just for this? martin

Puppet right now requires every element of a path to have an individual file definition. This makes it had to take an arbitrary path as a parameter. You are forced to require your client to make the entire path structure for you or instead you use an exec resource and call mkdir -p. Using an exec resource does not generate an File resources so autorequire does not work. I didn''t

Is there a wiki around anywhere? martin

we''re in the process of setting up an openldap server, for unified unix and webapp authentication, and i''m trying to find a good equivalent of adduser that takes care of generating unique unix numerical uids. what are people using for this? [i''ve googled around and found http://prope.insa-lyon.fr/~ppollet/ldap/useradd.pl but it''s dated 2000] martin

I have the following quick-and-dirty hack in my model: def after_destroy # search for orphaned tags and delete them orphans = Resource.tags_count :count => ''= 0'' orphans.keys.each {|tag| Tags.find_by_name(''tag'').destroy} end It''s nice from a readable code perspective, but it seems inefficient - is there some way to do this with only one

I was thinking, if I don''t manage to figure out the problem with acts_as_taggable, that I could untag objects via a direct SQL DELETE on the tag join table (something like "where tag_id = tag_to_delete and user_id = current_user"). Are there any dangers to this approach? martin

G'Day, rsync 3.0 to 3.2 is giving us trouble, keeps failing at certain points, latest error is :- expand file_list pointer array to 262144 bytes, did move I see this code is in flist.c, but why are we getting this and how to avoid it ? we are syncing from svn. Cheers Gav...