similar to: Continuing problems with zombied dovecot-auth procs; mail-cache-fields.c IMAP procs crashing

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Continuing problems with zombied dovecot-auth procs; mail-cache-fields.c IMAP procs crashing"

2006 Oct 27
2
imap process crashing with "file mail-cache-fields.c: line 26: unreached"
Hoping someone's seen this and/or can help...heh. I'm running the at rpm of dovecot, version dovecot-1.0-0_27.rc10.el4.at. I'm running it on RHEL4, up to date. We're using Maildir (we're upgraded from a Courier-IMAP installation) and things are working...but...we have a few users with very large mailboxes (not their inboxes) where they archive stuff (200k+ messages). When
2006 Nov 01
0
CRASH: mail-cache-fields.c crash - new info, hacked 'solution'
I'm baaaaack. :-) I've managed to implement a suggestion from Hans Morten Kind from this list that seems to have stopped the crashing. However, my hack - commenting out a call to i_unreached() - makes me queasy because I have no idea of the ramifications of it (I don't habitually code, myself). So I wanted to lay it out for y'all in case this is a problem that you feel
2005 Oct 12
3
Updates not catching up ?
Hi, I have downloaded and installed centos 4.1 from DVD and I a little confused with the update procedure. The faq from the centos.org site mentions something like 72 hrs (or less) from one security update to goes from the sources.rpm from rh to centos. I was cheking rh's site (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel4as-errata.html) and saw one update to mysql
2006 Mar 13
1
List of updates in Update 3 ?
While update 3 was released last week, it looks like there are 40 or so packages updated. I dunno about squid, it is listed on http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel4as-errata.html but the changelog is from October 2005 (unless it is an rhel only bug). audit-1.0.12-1.EL4.i386.rpm audit-libs-1.0.12-1.EL4.i386.rpm audit-libs-devel-1.0.12-1.EL4.i386.rpm bootparamd-0.17-21.RHEL4.i386.rpm
2006 Feb 07
1
Footprint - kickstart management tool
Hi, I'm planning to create a new tool to simplify creation and management of kickstart-files (as well as automate some of the tasks that come with automated installation). If you know of another mailinglist that fits this subject, or you know of similar projects (because I can imagine there are countless implementations inside companies) please let me know. I'm just in the design
2005 Jan 06
3
dovecot-auth zombie procs
Hi, every now and then it seems as if dovecot-auth zombie's out. When this happens nobody can log in. If I kill all the dovecot-auth processes and then restart dovecot everything seems to work again. I'm authenticating against an openldap server on a debian sarge box so I wonder if this has anything to do with it. All my clients are using Outlook. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
2007 Nov 20
2
Anyone using to_xml and procs...
I''m looking for comments on http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10162 In my opinion, the current behaviour is a bug, and should be fixed. If you have a use case where passing procs to the child associations is actually useful, chime in. Jonathan del Strother --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
2013 Jul 03
0
Weird Okular/KDE error - thousand procs spawned
Hello all: I'm trying to troubleshoot a strange and repeatable error and not sure where to log the bug report. I subscribe to Linux Journal and download their PDF. The DLJ230.pdf opens in the Okular PDF reader from Konqueror. If I scroll down to the ad for some colo site (www.ovh.com) and click the right side of the page, I immediately start getting hundreds of alerts on the desktop. These
2009 Aug 21
0
CentOS 4 i386 and x86_64 updates
The following updates have been released along with the CentOS 4.8 release (for i386 and x86_64). Individual announcements will not be made for these updates. Advisory Synopsis Date CESA-2009:1218 Critical: pidgin security update 2009-08-18 CESA-2009:1219 Important: libvorbis security update 2009-08-18 CEEA-2009:1214 tzdata enhancement update 2009-08-17 CESA-2009:1209 Moderate: curl
2005 Jun 09
1
[Fwd: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Update 1 Availability Announcement]
It's official -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Update 1 Availability Announcement Red Hat is pleased to announce the availability of Update 1 for the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 family of products, including: - Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS (v. 4) for x86, AMD64/EM64T, Itanium, POWER, S/390 and zSeries - Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES (v. 4) for
2006 Oct 27
1
suspected bug in dovecot-ldap setup?
Hi everyone, [first post: long and boring. beware!] I've been working on a virtual multidomain MX server with pop3 access. Accounting for users/domains is done via OpenLDAP with the Jamm[1] schema and dovecot is 1.0rc10 (dovecot-1.0-0_27.rc10.el4.at fetched as RPM from atrpms.net for CentOS 4.4). I intended to have authenticated binds but there was a problem with the user_filter
2006 Mar 09
1
Mutable models based on dbfunctions or stored procs?
Is there any way that a model can be based on a stored procedure or function that so that it can return a set of data based on a parameter provided in either the controller, or s a variable in the model? That way you could: 1) Set the variable 2) Call find_all 3) Get a mutable set of results that takes better advantage of some of the advanced database features available?
2006 Apr 13
1
What is the working directory for fastcgi procs w/Apache 2?
When running Apache and FastCGI with Rails, what determines the current working directory? Is there an easy way to discover which directory this is at runtime? WG -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2008 Mar 26
2
[LLVMdev] JIT and anonymous procs
The Kaleidoscope tutorial has us "interpreting" top-level expressions by generating a one-shot anonymous procedure and executing that. Once the expressions have been executed, these procedures will never be called again. How can the associated storage for this anonymous procedure be reclaimed? shap
2008 Mar 26
0
[LLVMdev] JIT and anonymous procs
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > The Kaleidoscope tutorial has us "interpreting" top-level expressions by > generating a one-shot anonymous procedure and executing that. Once the > expressions have been executed, these procedures will never be called > again. > > How can the associated storage for this anonymous procedure be > reclaimed? All
2008 Mar 26
0
[LLVMdev] JIT and anonymous procs
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Jonathan S. Shapiro <shap at eros-os.com> wrote: > > All functions in the tutorial are referenced by their Function*. The > > Function* uniquely identifies a function and is independent of the name. > > I had understood that. > > So now I have compiled and run my top level expression's anonymous > function. How do I go
2003 Sep 12
1
asterisk and defunct perl procs
Trying to figure out why I'm having all of my test (and demo) perl script in a defunct status. Each run creates a problem: ps output root 26253 1356 0 16:39 pts/1 00:00:00 asterisk -vvvc root 26270 26253 0 16:40 pts/1 00:00:00 [pj.pl <defunct>] root 26271 26253 0 16:40 pts/1 00:00:00 [pj.pl <defunct>] root 26273 26253 0 16:40 pts/1 00:00:00 [pj.pl
2008 Mar 26
3
[LLVMdev] JIT and anonymous procs
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:40 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > > The Kaleidoscope tutorial has us "interpreting" top-level expressions by > > generating a one-shot anonymous procedure and executing that. Once the > > expressions have been executed, these procedures will never be called > > again. > > > >
2010 Dec 01
2
Number of procs, redux
No answers to this? Sorry if it''s a stupid question, but I was hoping it would be dead easy for someone here to answer. I''ve edited in case it wasn''t clear enough. We upgraded to 2.6.3 and we''ve suddenly noticed two and sometimes three puppet processes frequently running on the clients. Is this normal? Is it new to this version or are we just noticing it for
2006 Mar 08
1
[Fwd: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Update 3 Availability Announcement]
Just in case there is one person on this list that isn't aware... and so it begins... Craig -------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: nahant-list at redhat.com > Reply-To: nahant-list at redhat.com > To: nahant-list at redhat.com > Subject: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Update 3 Availability Announcement > Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:32:51 -0500 > > Red Hat is pleased to