similar to: mail_extra_groups and home directory permissions

mail_extra_groups=mail setting is often used insecurely to give Dovecot access to create dotlocks to /var/mail directory. If you don't use mboxes in /var/mail, make sure this setting is cleared. If you do use /var/mail mboxes and Dovecot gives permission errors without it, do one of the following (in the preferred order): a) Upgrade to v1.0.11 and use the new mail_privileged_group setting

mail_extra_groups=mail setting is often used insecurely to give Dovecot access to create dotlocks to /var/mail directory. If you don't use mboxes in /var/mail, make sure this setting is cleared. If you do use /var/mail mboxes and Dovecot gives permission errors without it, do one of the following (in the preferred order): a) Upgrade to v1.0.11 and use the new mail_privileged_group setting

"Warning: mail_extra_groups setting was often used insecurely so it is now deprecated, use mail_access_groups or mail_privileged_group instead" I use the following: mail_extra_groups = mail nogroup Because I have the real and virtual accounts. What's the correct way to replace the above line? It seems that mail_privileged_group only accepts one group, but I need two. Any

I will give 770 a try. Nobody going to flip now that a single ?7? has been posted? > On May 6, 2019, at 12:06 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > What's the access mode of it? Should probably be mode 770 then. Cheers, Bee

I have just upgraded from 1.0.7 to 1.0.13. I read the comments in the example .conf file and it seemed what I needed to enable dotlock access to mailboxes in /var/spool/mail (writable by 'mail' group) was "mail_privileged_group = mail" so I removed the "mail_extra_groups = mail" that I had in 1.0.7 and added "mail_privileged_group = mail", but I got errors

Hello Timo, I'm using linux Fedora Core 2. The permissions are : drwxrwxrwt 2 root mail 32 2004-06-16 04:45 /var/spool/mail/ These permissions are made buy the command chmod a+rwxt /var/spool/mail. So if someone wants to erase the /var/spool/mail directory, it's possible unfortunately. If there are theses permissions the user can receive his mails but it's

Hi All, I'm using samba 3.0.10-1 on RedHat Enterprise Linux 4. I'm authentication to our PDC using Winbind and also mounting our home directory share (from Windows) onto our main Linux server such that when a user logs on to the Linux server, their Windows home directory is mounted also. I'm using the domain admin account to mount the home directory share, which I feel is

On 20/03/2023 16:58, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 20/03/2023 16:22, Thomas Hoffmann (Speed4Trade GmbH) via samba wrote: >> Hello, >> I have problems removing the permission settings on a directory/folder >> after configuration of a share. >> >> My folders look like: >> /var/folder1/folder2/ >> >> I created share1 on folder1 and

Hi, We've just put in a Samba fileserver to replace our windows box for our School District and it seems to be working great. I have a question about defining some specific permissions though. We set up 'Drop boxes' for teachers that kids can drag files into, but they don't have read permission so they can't read each others submitted work. Here's what is looks like on

I just transferred over my first server from Suse Linux with uw-imap(ipop3/imap2003) to CentOS with Dovecot (0.99). I didn't find any problems in the testing phase, but when the actual transfer into production happened I found a few problems crop up: 1. Dovecot wants to chdir in the user's home directory even when logging in via POP3. However, the mailboxes for POP3 are all in

Hi, I''m wondering if it''s easy to add timestamps to the mongrel log? I am having a problem where an externally spawned application by Rails is failing. Mongrel kindly logs the error message returned by this application when it fails. But it doesn''t record a timestamp as to when the error occurs, which makes it a little tricky to sync this up to my webserver logs to

Hello, I have problems removing the permission settings on a directory/folder after configuration of a share. My folders look like: /var/folder1/folder2/ I created share1 on folder1 and share2 on folder2. Afterwards, I activated ACLs and set permission on folder1 to domain/group1 and on folder2 to domain/group2. I couldn't access share2 with a user from group2 and I figured out that Samba

Hi folks! Our smb with LDAP PDC now seems to be nearly completed. Just now we found out something very mysterious. We organized some directorys to be used by specific domain groups. If we put a user into a group the user is allowed to access the associated share. So far this works pretty nice. If we remove the user from the domain group the user seems to keep all his rights he got from his group

Hello everybody! New to Samba (and the list) I am trying to set up a Samba PDC for a small enterprise network on a Debian Woody (3.0) system with a vanilla 2.4.24 kernel and the Debian package of Samba 3.0.1 and Swat (Debian Versions 3.0.1-2). I ran into various problems and could solve most of them during the past two weeks (hooray!). Most of the problems were related to congestions of user

Hi Guys, First, thanks for all the hard work! You all rock. I am running Samba 3.0.20a on RHEL 3 u5 x86, my configuration is working perfectly except for cvs commits for 3 users. We are using ADS, pam_winbind, and pam_require to authenticate CVS users against AD. Our CVS directories are mod 2775, and the group ownership of all dirs is the AD group "DEN-CVS-Users". Every valid user

I have been running Samba 4 as an AD/DC for a couple of years now with few problems. I provisioned the domain using --dns-backend=BIND9_FLATFILE and the /etc/named.conf includes the samba-tool provision created file /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf, with zone files in /var/lib/samba/private/dns. All that has been working just fine for for 2 or 3 years. Lately, I added a VirtualBox XP guest

Hi folks, I'm running CentOS 6.5 on our storage nodes, with Samba 4.1.11 RPMs from Sernet. We're having a strange issue with MacOSX clients (testing on 10.9.4) when writing directories. Relevant smb.conf share portions: create mask = 0660 force create mode = 0660 directory mask = 0770 force directory mode = 0770 nt acl support = no With these in

Hi! I have few question to developers of VFS ACL modules (acl_tdb and acl_xattr): 1. Do you plan to extend quantity of entries in acl_tdb (now I can write 22 user ACLs plus CREATOR OWNER, CREATOR GROUP, domain users and everyone) 2. Do you plan to fix few ACLs eg. Traverse folder / Execute file (to traverse I need to enable additional permission List folder / read data to traverse through

Dear everyone, I want to traverse call graph, but I have some trouble . In my pass MyPass which need to traverse call graph, I firstly added the CallGraph analysis to the pass requirements by *AU.addRequired<CallGraph>();* My pass MyPass then will be added to a pass manager by *manager.add(new MyPass());* and then I want to traverse the call graph such as: CallGraph CG =

I'm looking for a way to traverse machine basic blocks in a specific order. Basically I want all blocks that are predecessors to the current block to be traversed before the current block. I've looked at MachineDominatorTree but this doesn't traverse them in quite the way I want them to. Anyone know of a way to do this? Thanks, Micah -------------- next part -------------- An HTML