similar to: Separate auth for pop and imap

Hi. Does the dovecot deliver helper program now support maildirs? Are there plans to support this? -- Daniel Mikkelsen Copyleft Software AS

Hi. Is it possible to ignore "leave on server" for POP3 clients? That is, always delete all downloaded mail automatically? -- Daniel Mikkelsen Copyleft Software AS

Hi. Is it possible to prevent certain folders from being deleted via IMAP using Dovecot? I don't want to write protect the folders, just prevent people from deleting their Junk, Trash, Drafts, etc. -- Daniel Mikkelsen Copyleft Software AS

Hi there, is there any way to get the imap and pop client to use separate keys? My Thunderbird client complains when I am popping from popss.domain.com that the certificate is owned by imapss.domain.com Any clues here? Cheers, Noah

Hi there, Firstly, thanks for the great software. I am just wondering if it is possible to configure dovecot to use different authentication configurations for the imap and pop processes. Specifically, I am looking to use a different SQL query for each process. Kind regards, Roger -- ------------------------------------------------------------- Ninth Avenue Software p:

Hi First of all thanks to the authors of dovecot. It's a pleasure to work with it. I would like to ask, if somebody has an idea about how I can combine all mailusers (dovecot pop/imap & sendmail smtp) into one db, given that I'd like to use sasl with CRAM-MD5 as authentication mechanism to ensure security. The idea behind my question is, that it is easier to administer all mail

Hi! I world like to have different queries to let a user use pop only or imap only (webmail) accounts. It would really be very useful. I have not found any workaround get it working with dovecot. Could it be possible ? It should not be too difficult, I suppose. Max

Server: Ubuntu 9.04 desktop edition Dovecot 1.1.11 Issue: I have set dovecot.conf with: disable_plaintext_auth = no but everytime I have a client (Windows Live Mail, ubuntu evolution) connect from the Internet, I have the following type of message: Plaintext authentication disallowed on non-secure (SSL/TLS) connections. in my mail.log, I have: Jul 28 15:09:43 "name" dovecot:

Hi, I'm testing out 2.1.rc1, building against clucene 2.3.3.4. Without libstemmber, the build fails because it attempts to include SnowballAnalyzer.h which is not part of "core" clucene. Simple patch below to make dovecot 2.1.rc1 build with clucene but without libstemmer (or textcat). Looking at libstemmer itself, there are multiple versions. The version in clucene is put into

Hello all, I'm trying to understand when exactly the variable substitution happens in Dovecot, as I get different results in the LDA and in the POP/IMAP server. Here's my general setup: - Postfix MTA, delivers mail via Dovecot LDA - users list sits in a database - mail directory is stored in the database, but with Dovecot variables inside Delivery works perfectly fine,

> On 28/10/2011 04:14, Jan Mikkelsen wrote: > >/ Hi, > />/ > />/ There is a patch linked to from this PR, which seems very similar: > />/ > />/ http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/140416 > />/ > />/ http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2011-March/004839.html > />/ > />/ The problem is also consistent with running

Hi I use dovecot as imap/pop proxy. Is it possible to filter the messages before they get delivered to the client? Thanks for any hint how to achieve this. Mike

Dear All, I hope you can help me on this trouble i am getting. I cant seem to get email even though i have given the correct directory for mail location. Here is my config: ===== # 2.1.7: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 x86_64 Debian 7.0 ext4 auth_mechanisms = plain login disable_plaintext_auth = no first_valid_uid = 1001 last_valid_uid = 1001 mail_debug = yes mail_gid = exim

Hello dovecot community, first of all: dovecot ist great! ;) ...nevertheless I?ve got some problems to get my director scenario running as needed/expected :( My scenario: I?d like to configure two dovecot backends, without the need for multiple dovecot instances. Both backend servers are active/active and act on top of a glusterfs storage, which implies the need for dovecot director. As

Aki-san, Thanks for your feedback. Whatever ways will do. For instance, in a thunderbird mail client, a pop-up message or notification email telling client that the password will be expired in XX days, something like this, would be nice. Thanks, Masaharu Kawada On 2016?06?08? 15:49, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On 08.06.2016 09:37, mkawada at redhat.com wrote: >> Dear list, >>

Hello! I have a problem with the POP when I want to use mbox and Maildirs. The old users are now using uw-imap, but in the future should theres old e-mail be in mbox format and the new e-mails in maildirs. I'am using this code and its worked fine in Squirrelmail and IMAP. namespace private { separator = / inbox = yes hidden = no prefix = "mbox/" location =

Greetings! I dug thru the archives but didn't see a clear answer to this. A client has an existing sendmail/pop3 system, and I would like to switch to dovecot for imap support. For imap I much prefer the Maildir format over mbox, however, sendmail natively dumps to mbox (mailspool) and that is what pop typically reads. I've read the threads on how to make sendmail write to Maildir. My

Hello, I would like to know if it could be appears problem using POP and IMAP in a mailbox? Is it adviced to use one of the two protocols? My users use IMAP to see their emails (in the webmail) and POP3 to download their emails (in outlook/thunderbird). Is it best to use the same protocol? POP and IMAP have the same quota engine? Thanks. -Nicolas

I''ve got qualcomm''s qpopper2.2, and am not sure if its vulnerable. The advisory mentions pop and imap servers, but only says: version of IMAP (Section B). If your POP server is based on the University of Washington IMAP server code, you should also upgrade to the latest version of IMAP. Until you can take one of these actions, I installed the new imapd about 3

Hello everybody, I have a question, though I'm not sure if it's a matter of dovecot or postfix. Or if it's even possible to do at all. If I understand it correctly, SMTP authentification is done via SASL. When a user wants to login Postfix queries an external user database (dovecot). Therefore the SMTP-users are identical to the IMAP/POP-users. I want to achieve the following: I