similar to: RFC compliance on folder lists

Hi, I think I already know the answer to this and I agree with it, but I have a question about "invalid" mailbox naming decisions in dovecot. Technically, RFC3501 (Section 5.1, pg. 18, client consideration 3) says that * and % are legal in mailbox names, though it implicitly discourages their use. We just migrated to dovecot, and unfortunately have a few users who used * in their

Hi, I am using Dovecot 1.0 beta 7, moving to beta8 probably tomorrow. I am seeing a few RFC compliance issues with IMAP responses. I have an in-house IMAP client that caches IMAP data for a web mail system (it parses millions of IMAP interactions a day), and it reports whenever it gets a line that does not look RFC compliant. Unfortunately, users modify their mailboxes before I can get a copy

Hi, I am getting intermittent error messages in the log when my mail client tries to create/open a folder named ".imhoprefs". Some accounts seem to able to do it, but I have at least one that gives the log error: Feb 7 09:29:54 acad-cl1 dovecot: imap(tkay): close() failed with index file (in-memory index): Bad file descriptor I traced through the code, and it seems to be coming from

I mis-read the line. -- Anthony Kay University Computing Center (541) 346-1719 GPG Fingerprint: B0DB D46A 60AF FAE7 A94A 5075 0CB4 4D88 9F4F 7F09 This isn't right. This isn't even wrong. Wolfgang Pauli

The configuration files has settings that seem to address the issues of using indexes on NFS (i.e. locking and mmap fixes), but we are using Dovecot on NFS, and when the load gets high we start to see a lot of NFS stale file handle errors, particularly with MS clients like Outlook. I see the discussion about these errors from last year. Any updates on the state of the code? Should we be using

Environment: Dovecot 1.0beta8 Host: 64 bit Red Hat AS4 Linux (2.6.9-34.0.1) Disks: NFS netapp In the case below, the two connections were going through two separate servers sharing disks via an NFS NetApp. Here is the sequence of operations: 1. Open a connection to a folder (say mail/Trash) 2. Open a connection to another folder (say Inbox) 3. Move messages from Inbox to Trash using this

Hi, We are using Dovecot with maildir, and the mail client requests flags, internaldate, and uid for all messages on folder open, which on average takes 3 seconds, but for large folders is much longer. It seems like I want mail_cache_fields to include "flags", but which date corresponds to internaldate? date.received? Is UID always cached for messages, or does it have to read through

There was a patch posted to fix dotfile folder names in this mail: http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2005-July/008127.html I have a web mail client (which stores preferences in a dot-file/folder through IMAP) and pine users (address book is a dot-folder in IMAP) that this affects. I can certainly hand-apply the patch, but I'd feel a lot more comfortable if this had some future in the real

How does Dovecot handle accounts when writes are denied, such as in situations when a user is over quota, or the filesystem is full? -- Anthony Kay University Computing Center (541) 346-1719 GPG Fingerprint: B0DB D46A 60AF FAE7 A94A 5075 0CB4 4D88 9F4F 7F09 Only a statue can be perfect, and even then it casts a shadow. - Merle Fossum

Hi, Mac mail (a horribly mis-behaved client, it seems), has a horribly hard time deleting/copying large blocks of messages from one folder to another. The basic symptom is: 1. Select a bunch of messages 2. Click on delete 3. Wait for a _very_ long time. It also seems very slow on copying, so it may be the "trash folder copy on delete" that is really slowing it down. Anybody else seen

In the midst of evaluating Dovecot for use in solving some mbox locking issues (while also waiting for our eventual migration to maildir), I had an epiphany. It looks like Dovecot's auto-detection of mail formats would allow us to migrate from mbox to maildir on a user-by-user basis! I was thinking: 1. Let dovecot autodetect mail storage 2. Use some procmail trickery to detect which format

Hi, We are using mbox and UW IMAP, and are having issues because UW IMAP does not support multiple client access when you use NFS for the mail files. I've done some research (see the comments after my 2 questions below), and most of the other major IMAP servers simply don't support it (courier is about the only one that has a positive comment). How much testing have you done

I know df does not report the correct size for btrfs raid systems. Is there any other way to find out the total capacity of a btrfs file system? Or at least the raid level for data / metadata? My test system is Ubuntu 10.10 alpha with btrfs 0.19 and a 2.6.35 kernel (don''t know which rc). # uname -a Linux ubuntu 2.6.35-12-generic #17-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jul 26 18:48:06 UTC 2010 x86_64

Hello ALL, Anybody performed ASTERISK Testing for RFC 3261 Compliance? If Yes, Please share Result. Best Regards,Sakharam Thorat. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20131028/1dcffece/attachment.html>

Hello All, Im using OpenSSH 4.2p1 statically linked with OpenSSL 0.9.7i. It looks now that a fips certified OpenSSL is now available at http://www.openssl.org/source/OpenSSL-fips-1.0.tar.gz . I like to know of any patches applicable for OpenSSH versions to make it fips compliant. Is there any idea for OpenSSH core team to make OpenSSH as fips compliant? What amount of work it needs at this

Hi , I want to use PE 2.0 compliance feature , however i am not seeing any data on puppet-dashboard on compliance tab , it says no baseline set , reviewed NA etc..... I have written audit manifests class foo { file {''/etc/resolv.conf'': audit => all, } file {''/etc/services'': audit => all, } } and

The Xen platform device (introduced in changeset 11161) would cause HCT''s PCI Compliance Test to generate a failure message. The patch fixes this. Thanks Dexuan Cui Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <dexuan.cui@intel.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Dear Sirs, we currently manufacture/import UPS units in Italy and distribute them all over the country. How can we obtain an official certification to offer our products with full compliance with QNAP, Synology and similar hardware? Looking forward to hearing from you, Best Regards ________________________ Alessandro Gualtieri LAER Accumulatori Srl Via Pio XII, 65/c 20060 - Pozzuolo

Colleagues, I'm software engineer from Institute for System Programing of Russian Academy of Sciences and we are developing a free lightweight tool for checking backward/forward binary compatibility of shared C/C++ libraries in OS Linux. It checks interface signatures and data type definitions in two library versions (headers and shared objects) and searches ABI changes that may lead to

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On restore, virtio pci does the following: > + set features > + init vqs etc - device can be used at this point! > + set ACKNOWLEDGE,DRIVER and DRIVER_OK status bits > > This is in violation of the virtio spec, which > requires the following order: > - ACKNOWLEDGE > - DRIVER > -