similar to: 1.0rc8 - not quite yet

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "1.0rc8 - not quite yet"

2006 Oct 09
2
1.0.rc8 released
I've still over 200 mails unread in the mailing list, and important things left in TODO. This release is an improvement over rc7 anyway, hopefully I'll have time to fix the rest soon. http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc8.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc8.tar.gz.sig * GSSAPI: Changed POP3 service name to "pop", which is what the standard says *
2006 Oct 09
2
1.0.rc8 released
I've still over 200 mails unread in the mailing list, and important things left in TODO. This release is an improvement over rc7 anyway, hopefully I'll have time to fix the rest soon. http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc8.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc8.tar.gz.sig * GSSAPI: Changed POP3 service name to "pop", which is what the standard says *
2006 Oct 12
2
1.0rc8: another problem? Possibly 64-bit index?
Yesterday I gave a status report about 10.rc8 in production, which mentioned a problem about "Login process died too early..." Timo suggested a patch for logging error messages. I've applied this. Others suggested increasing "login_max_processes_count". That was already way above our likely maximum, but I've doubled it anyway. Today, I've just repeated the
2006 Oct 10
1
sieve deliver and sun cc compilers
sieve deliver still doesn't build with Sun cc. any suggestions ? thank you. cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I/export/home/sho/src/dovecot/rc8/dovecot-1.0.rc8 -I/export/home/sho/src/dovecot/rc8/dovecot-1.0.rc8/src/lib -I../../src -I/opt/SUNWconn/crypto/include -xjobs=4 -c comparator.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/comparator.o "comparator.c", line 149: syntax error before or at:
2006 Oct 10
1
RC8 failing...
I just tried upgrading from RC7 to RC8 this morning, and I'm seeing an issue I've never seen before. On my first POP3 login, all is fine, but any subsequent logins seem to fail with the message: dovecot: Oct 10 11:04:31 Error: Maximum number of mail processes exceeded In the dovecot log file. I'm also oddly seeing the message: Oct 10 11:01:05 popbkup pop3-login: [ID 799321
2009 Jun 08
1
[PATCH] Btrfs: fdatasync should skip metadata writeout
Hi. In btrfs, fdatasync and fsync are identical. I think fdatasync should skip committing transaction when inode->i_state is set just I_DIRTY_SYNC and this indicates only atime or/and mtime updates. Following patch improves fdatasync throughput. #sysbench --num-threads=16 --max-requests=10000 --test=fileio --file-block-size=4K --file-total-size=16G --file-test-mode=rndwr
2009 Jun 09
2
[PATCH] OCFS2: fdatasync should skip unimportant metadata writeout
Hi. In ocfs2, fdatasync and fsync are identical. I think fdatasync should skip committing transaction when inode->i_state is set just I_DIRTY_SYNC and this indicates only atime or/and mtime updates. Following patch improves fdatasync throughput. #sysbench --num-threads=16 --max-requests=300000 --test=fileio --file-block-size=4K --file-total-size=16G --file-test-mode=rndwr
2009 Jul 01
9
v1.2.0 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.0.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.0.tar.gz.sig As promised. No changes since v1.2.rc8 (except packaged in OS X, since CentOS 5 autotools didn't add support for configure --docdir). Below are the largest changes since v1.1: * When creating files or directories to mailboxes, Dovecot now uses the mailbox directory's
2009 Jul 01
9
v1.2.0 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.0.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.0.tar.gz.sig As promised. No changes since v1.2.rc8 (except packaged in OS X, since CentOS 5 autotools didn't add support for configure --docdir). Below are the largest changes since v1.1: * When creating files or directories to mailboxes, Dovecot now uses the mailbox directory's
2006 Oct 11
2
1.0rc8 status report
A quick status report on how 1.0rc8 behaved in service for a few hours with several hundred simultaneous users, at a site very new to dovecot. Oh, and a question at the end. Summary: Reasonable for a first shot but one significant problem, requiring backing off. Background: We have a long-established UW-IMAP service for a user population of about 20,000 based on a few Linux (Redhat) machines
2009 Sep 05
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release1 ready for testing
On 2009-08-31 08:50, Tanya Lattner wrote: > LLVMers, > > 2.6 pre-release1 is ready to be tested by the community. > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ > Hi Tanya, Here are the results for x86_64 Linux (Debian unstable): > You will notice that we have quite a few pre-compiled binaries (of > both clang and llvm-gcc). We have identified several bugs that will be > fixed in
2020 Sep 08
3
ssh: case insensitive fingerprint validation
Hello! I noticed the ssh client now allows you to paste a fingerprint at the host key verification question which I thought was pretty cool and a welcome feature. When testing it out I discovered it did not care about the case of the entered hash, and looking at sshconnect.c I see strcasecmp() is used which explains why. I'm just curious if this was a deliberate decision or if it would make
2015 Feb 13
0
I can't join to an existing domain (yet)
On 13/02/15 15:29, Denis Morejon Lopez wrote: > > I tried first all these with linux ldbmodify using that ldif with the > dn:: (code 64) > but an error like the last you will see here occurred. > > Then, I tried with Windows ldifde. > > # The Windows OS is in spanish. That's why I will comment the must > important lines for you (Since my point of view). > >
2016 Oct 16
0
not quite demoted, yet
On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 19:00 -0500, Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba wrote: > A few days ago I demoted my first DC (a v4.2.14, I think) and thought > the demote had gone well. Now, when I run "samba-tool dnsupdate > --verbose" I can see references to the first DC that remain. > Unfortunately, that DC no longer exists so I simply cannot demote it > again.  > >
2004 Jan 01
0
Winbind not quite working yet
Hello, I'm trying to get Winbind to authenticate users that don't have local accounts on a SAMBA BDC. I have (3) BDCs (1) PDC running OpenLDAP 2.1.23 pass backend and Samba 3.0. These are on RedHat 8.0 systems. 3 BDC are also slave LDAP and 1 master directory server on the PDC. I went through the Samba documentation CH21 and made modifications to the BDCs and PDC as follows:
2016 Oct 14
2
not quite demoted, yet
A few days ago I demoted my first DC (a v4.2.14, I think) and thought the demote had gone well. Now, when I run "samba-tool dnsupdate --verbose" I can see references to the first DC that remain. Unfortunately, that DC no longer exists so I simply cannot demote it again. Following the instructions on the "Demote a Samba AD DC" page "Verifying The Demotion" section, I
2009 Jun 30
1
v1.2.rc8 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/rc/dovecot-1.2.rc8.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/rc/dovecot-1.2.rc8.tar.gz.sig Last few fixes before tomorrow's v1.2.0 release. Also this release was built in dovecot.org to make sure I can make a usable Dovecot release while not at work/home. :) - Fixed building LDAP as plugin - Fixed starting up in OS X
2009 Jun 30
1
v1.2.rc8 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/rc/dovecot-1.2.rc8.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/rc/dovecot-1.2.rc8.tar.gz.sig Last few fixes before tomorrow's v1.2.0 release. Also this release was built in dovecot.org to make sure I can make a usable Dovecot release while not at work/home. :) - Fixed building LDAP as plugin - Fixed starting up in OS X
2010 Mar 31
0
config dump for success with Xen 4.0 rc8 + 2.6.32.10 pv_ops kernel
Hello, Build: Xen 4.0 rc8 + 2.6.32.10 pv_ops kernel Following the post by Thiago http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2010-03/msg00913.html and the follow-ups by Boris I succeeded with the build. This box is server only running with Intel C2Duo on a P45 chipset. Starting with Thiago''s kernel config, I removed all sound and MM drivers. My initrd was still 63+ MB. The
2015 Feb 13
0
I can't join to an existing domain (yet)
On 13/02/15 19:31, Denis Morejon Lopez wrote: > Yes, it exists and it's a real pc: > > (Command) > ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb '(CN=PC009375)' > > (Response) > # record 1 > dn: CN=PC009375,CN=Computers,DC=dtcf,DC=etecsa,DC=cu > objectClass: top > objectClass: person > objectClass: organizationalPerson > objectClass: user >