similar to: test mail

>> why not just point them at a hosting service like google apps, and let google keep things up to date? Costs money, and also the problem is that gmail imposes heavy spam filters and "reputation blocks" meaning smaller providers with low email volumes, are put in the spam folder, even if they never send spam, just because their email volume is so low (ergo, they must prove they

On Mar 12, 2019, Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > On 12.3.2019 13.46, Piper Andreas via dovecot wrote: > >> after an upgrade of dovecot-2.2.5 to dovecot-2.3.4 the dovecot-keywords, >> which in my case are set by thunderbird, are not preserved any more when >> moving a mail between folders. > > We are aware of this bug, and it's being

X-Loop header could be what I was looking for, thanks! On 28/11/19 22:03, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote: > On 28 Nov 2019, at 09:44, Claudio Corvino <ccorvino at trustitalia.it> wrote: >> Just one problem remaining: the e-mail that have LIST at domain.tld in BCC could not be intercepted by the sieve filter as in the header is not present any reference to LIST at domain.tld; am I

Hello, How can I pass a hash as parameter from a template with url_for? e.g. : if I have test = { :a => "a", :b => "b" } How can I pass that with my request? Is it possible to pass nested hash''es to? Right now, url_for :action => :test, test doesn''t seem to work. Thank you, --

The "duplicate" test was removed because not working in this particular case, I already read the RFC but I didn't find anything useful for our case. I'll try replacing `if true` with `if not duplicate` into sieve script and I'll post back the result. The "true" check is used to enable the out of office rule, otherwise we use "if false # true" to

Oliver Welter: > >after upgrading my mail server (dovecot 1.1.7 -> 2.2.13) I get tons of > >messages about corrupted index files in the syslog ("Error: Corrupted > >transaction log" and "Warning: fscking index file .. dovecot.index". > > > Some more debugging - I did a "fuser" on a broken dovecot.index file > and see a lot of stale

Hi, I think that the test "if not duplicate" could not work for our case, as the out of office should answer everytime, we only wants the redirect to not be sent as a duplicate for the users of the alias LIST. In other words we would like: 1) To redirect the e-mail directed to a single user (with out of office active) to LIST at domain.tld, so that every user of the LIST receives

The recipients in the vacation :addresses String list are matched case-sensitive. If the recipient gets a mail with wrong case, the message is discarded with: "discarding vacation response for implicitly delivered message; no known (envelope) recipient address found in message headers" I think the matching should be case-insensitive. Is this a bug or do I miss some option? I'm

:-) I'm using postfix for mail delivery and dovecot for mailbox access imaps pop3s. Postfix resolves, verifies and overwrites users' addresses by numerous subtle LDAP queries. However users are visible as local ones (openldap, pam, nss) in the sense I can run `id' or `finger' queries and receive replies. Dovecot handles all mailboxes over imap/pop correctly with no

Hi, Is it possible to configure Dovecot to reject mail that is not encrypted. In other words: 1. If the user tries to send an unencrypted message from their MUA, the server rejects it. 2. If a third-party tries to send an unencrypted message to the user, the server rejects it. The end result would be that no mail stored on the server can be decrypted by the administrator. I am aware that: *

>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> writes: Mark> This is just me throwing things out to look at, but did the Mark> client mount on the old server use NFS3 and the new upgraded Mark> client uses NFS4? Sometimes that can cause weirdness with id Mark> mapping.? Another thing to check is selinux, is it enabled? It's one of those

Hi, we have dovecot-ee-2.2.18.2 and pigeonhole/managesieve 0.4.8 running for some time. Today some users informed us that they did not get mails from one project account forwarded to there personal accounts any more. This worked till one week ago and I cant think of any changes we made... The project account keeps a copy of received mails. I tried two different accounts to configure

I would have to also hack the email client since I don't enter my 20 character high entropy password when I send or retrieve email. You really need an email standard to integrate TOTP. To be realistic, you need Gmail to use it. Whatever Gmail wants is essentially a defacto standard. I live in the real world, so whatever Google wants, I comply. ? Original Message ? From: jtam.home at

Hello! we are about to move from cyrus to dovecot and have one open issue for that migration. With cyrus we have "shared/" folders with a name that is self defined like shared/project-xyz but the email address for direct delivery to that folder my be different (not project-xyz at domain.com). With dovecot we try to have it similar (at least how the user sees it in the client) like it

Hi (Stephan?), is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3 /pigeonhole 0.5 that a sieve "redirect" changes the envelope sender of a redirected mail or simply a bug ? A sends mail to B, B redirects to C C sees B (not A!) as envelope sender. It is not a problem if C gets the mail but if that mail bounces for various reasons it goes back to B and A will never know about this. I thick this is came

Hi folks, Since Docker can bind-mount every .ssh directory I am looking for some way to forbid unprotected private keys. AFAICS it is currently not possible on the sshd to verify that the peer's private key was protected by a passphrase. Can you confirm? Regards Harri

is it possible to do with asterisk something like this how ? maybe some copy of extensions and some other file ..pls. call to asterisk server -> user 100 is busy -> recorded msg say "all lines are busy , pls wait" ,"you are second caller in 'queue', pls wait" -> caller is on hold till user 100 busy then ring user 100 (ext100) another call to asterisk

Hi, I did the upgrade frpom 1.2.x to 2.2.10 and had some warnings/errors on a very few accounts/mailboxes. All of them where permission related and solved. Dovecot rocks again. But on one mailbox I do get an error: Error: user rechnnugseingang-animationsinstitut: Initialization failed: Initializing mail storage from mail_location setting failed Error: Invalid user settings. Refer to server

I have a brief from a local hotel to build a PBX using Asterisk but they want to use their exisiting telephones and wiring from an old PBX that no longer works. Basically, I can build the system but an looking for a card that will allow for upto 20 extensions to be wired into the back of the PC. Doeas anyone know of a solution to this Sean-- ICQ: 679813 FidoNet: 2:263/950 Jabber:

We have antiquated caller ID schemes here in Australia. We barely support numbers from other local carriers, let alone OS ones. Certainly no names either.