similar to: cmusieve plugin

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "cmusieve plugin"

2009 Feb 20
2
CMUSieve with virtual users
Hi, I'm using dovecot 1.1.7 on Gentoo with Postfix and PostfixAdmin to manage my virtual users. I'm trying to use sieve (which has been compiled with Dovecot) but it doesn't work. I added cmusieve in the lda protocol : mail_plugins = cmusieve mail_plugin_dir = /usr/lib/dovecot/lda My maildir scheme is : /home/vmail/%d/%n/.maildir The sieve file is in
2009 Mar 08
1
hwo can i have managesieve protocol and cmusieve plugin work at the same time
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello everybody, I would like to use managesieve protocol and cmusieve plugin at the same time. I have used the cmusieve plugin for years and I now also enabled the managesieve system. I got the managesieve system working but when I activate the managesieve filter for the user the cmusieve sieve filter is not used anymore. How can I have both sieve
2006 Jul 04
2
Dovecot 1.0 RC1 + Plugin cmusieve "Sendmail qui with signal 11"
I just install RC1 + Plugin cmusieve (cvs), the sieve script is compiled and the sive lib seems OK. But in my log I have sendmail qui with signal 11 when I try to send a mail with "redirect" or "vacation" ? Any possibilitie to use a external SMTP server ? Signal 11 with sendmail is often a memory problem, but the server is in production since more than one month without any
2009 Nov 17
3
plugin cmusieve not found
I have debian lenny and dovecot 1.2.4 and a problem with the plugin cmusieve. protocol lda { postmaster_address = postmaster at cablenet.com.pe mail_plugins = cmusieve quota log_path = /var/log/dovecot-deliver.log info_log_path = /var/log/dovecot-deliver.log } the log /var/log/dovecot-deliver.log shows me the following Fatal: Plugin cmusieve not found from directory
2006 Jul 06
0
cmusieve bug: vaction + redirect
I found a bug in cmusieve plugin. I can do redirect: --- redirect "booking at jamesdo.com"; redirect "chabanel at net4all.ch"; keep; --- And vacation: --- require "vacation"; vacation :days 5 :addresses "info at lda.net4all.ch" :subject "Out of Office Reply" "Thanks for your email. I'm away from my desk, so I won't be able to
2010 Dec 22
4
trying to make cmusieve happen globally
In Dovecot 1.1.11 cmusieve is apparently integrated in the Ubuntu 9.10 package "dovecot-common" since the files are there. I am wanting to right now just do a very basic test of the setup to see how it runs before doing more sophisticated steps that could obscure any errors or bugs (e.g. unit testing). So I took the following example sieve script from the wiki1 documentation: require
2007 Jun 12
1
Cannot get cmusieve to work
Hi, # I messed with the identities in my MUA and sent the email with a non registered address, sorry for the incinvenience ## I'm not able to make cmusieve to work to filter emails. Below is my configuration. I'm using a .dovecot-sieve example from the wiki: require "fileinto"; if exists "X-Spam-Flag" { ? fileinto ".Junk/"; } I've been following
2010 Mar 25
1
cmusieve auto-reply and quota
Hi there, I'm quite new to Dovecot, but already can tell that it is a really great work, congrats to the developers! But I'm having a little problem and couldn't figure it out how to solve. First, let me talk about my setup: I'm running Debian 5 (Lenny) with it's default Dovecot (common, pop3 and imap) packages (version 1:1.0.15-2.3+lenny1), I really would like to keep it
2010 Oct 18
1
cmusieve and logging
Hello, is there a way to write a logfile during sieve-actions? At least, I have trouble in reading sieve-scripts with tools from kmail ("connection refused) or thunderbird (timed out: server does not answer). There is no problem with the mailbox itself in reading or writing in it. The config for Sieve: dovecot.conf: ## ## LDA specific settings ## protocol lda { # Address to use when
2008 Dec 15
2
cmusieve, vacation and error at file_dotlock_create
Hello again, managesieve is working. Now I tried a vacation script with the result that the vacation response is sent but I got he following error: deliver(test1 at xxxxxx.de): 2008-12-15 14:34:28 Error: file_dotlock_create(/home/vmail/%d/%n/Maildir/.dovecot.lda-dupes) failed: No such file or directory /home/vmail/xxxxxx.de/test1/Maildir/ is the correct dir, there are the other files like
2009 Jan 22
3
cmusieve don't works for me...
Ok, sorry to bother again, but i am going crazy to make work cmusieve with dovecot. I intend to use it for the vacation system, but...seems the system ignores the .dovecot.sieve file into the user dir... I am doing something wrong, but i don't know what... Here is my configs: I use OpenSuse 11.0. # 1.1.7: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.25.20-0.1-pae i686 openSUSE 11.0 (i586) ext3
2007 Apr 26
2
SEGV with Dovecot v1.0.0 Deliver and cmusieve v1.0.1 and vacation
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I have a small Sieve script that tries to use vacation that segfaults. The script is the one from http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sieve. When I change the email address (I changed the local part into "skai"), hence, vacation is skipped, the mail is delivered without any problem. ==== script start require ["fileinto",
2004 Apr 07
1
Possible security hole in racoon verified on FreeBSD using racoon-20030711
Hi, while testing racoon on Linux (based on the ported ipsec-tools) the following issue appeared: Racoon did not verify the RSA Signatures during Phase 1 in either main or aggressive mode. Authentication was possible using a correct certificate and a wrong private key. I have verified the below problem using racoon-20030711 on FreeBSD 4.9. I will test it using the SNAP Kit but suspect it to be
2010 Feb 12
1
Assign Name of Data Frame
Hello R Experts, How can I assign the name of a data frame with the argument of a function? Specifically I am using RODBC to build local dataframes from SAS datasets on a remote server. I would like the local dataframe have the same name as the source SAS dataset, and the function below is what I am developing. However, the "substitute(table)" on the left side of the assignment
2015 Jan 22
2
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
> On Jan 22, 2015, at 1:22 PM, Fiona Glaser <fglaser at apple.com> wrote: > > According to Agner’s docs, many CPUs have slower BT than TEST; Haswell has only 0.5 inverse throughput as opposed to 0.25, Atom has 1 instead of 0.5, and Silvermont can’t even dual-issue BT (it locks both ALUs). So while BT does seem have a shorter instruction encoding than TEST for TEST reg, imm32 where
2011 Aug 13
2
How do I subset a dataframe
I have a dataframe zeespan. One of the columns has the name "customer". The data in the customer column is text. I would like to return a subset of the dataframe with all rows that DON'T begin with either "ibm" or "exxon", or "sears" in the customer column. I tried .... subset(zeespan, customer != c("ibm" | "exxon" |
2015 Jan 22
3
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
Is that even a valid instruction? I thought TEST only took 32-bit immediates. Fiona > On Jan 22, 2015, at 2:48 PM, Chris Sears <chris.sears at gmail.com> wrote: > > The problem is that REX TEST reg,#(1<<37) is 10 bytes vs 5 bytes for REX BT reg,37. > That's a large space penalty to pay for a possible partial update stall. > > So the idea of generating BT for
2015 Jan 22
3
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
Yeah, the alternative is to do movabs and then test, which is doable but I’m not sure if it’s worth it (surely BT + risk of flags merging penalty has to be better than two ops, one of which is ~9-10 bytes). Fiona > On Jan 22, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Chris Sears <chris.sears at gmail.com> wrote: > > My bad on that. So that's what the comment meant. > That means BT is pretty much
2015 Jan 22
2
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
On Thu Jan 22 2015 at 3:32:53 PM Chris Sears <chris.sears at gmail.com> wrote: > The status quo is: > > a) 40b REX+BT instruction for the 64b case > b) 48b TEST for the 32b case > c) unless it's small TEST > > > You are currently paying a 16b penalty for TEST vs BT in the 32b case. > That may be worth testing the -Os flag. > You'll want -Oz here, Os
2015 Jan 22
2
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
That’s not how partial-flags update stalls work. There is no independent tracking of individual bits in EFLAGS. This means that BT + CMOVNZ has a false dependency on whatever instruction wrote to EFLAGS before BT and requires an extra µop vis-a-vis TEST + CMOVNZ or SHR + AND. Please do not use BT. It is a performance hazard. If you don’t believe me for some reason, here’s the relevant quote