similar to: What makes Rails'' routes non-thread-safe?

I didn''t quite see a direct answer to Matt''s question regarding running merb from SVN: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/merb-devel/2007-July/000132.html In a merb application, is there something comparable to having rails in the vendor/ folder of a rails app? Thanks, Duane Johnson (canadaduane)

Is Rails Logger truly not Thread Safe? http://log.kares.org/2011/04/railslogger-is-not-threadsafe.html This seems like an issue that should have been picked up quite a long time ago. I just set config.threadsafe! in my config/application.rb and my log output from rails server has completely disappeared. If the logger is not thread-safe, I cannot help but wonder how much of the Rails core is

All, So I got passed my initial hurdles with merb 0.4. And all seems to work very nicely. Thank you all for your help ! One thing though, why should I have to bounce the merb server when I change my controller or associated classes ? Am I missing something ? I am having flash back to my java days where I now have to reflect on what changed and bounce the server accordingly...

So this has been an idea ever since Rails came out. Why not use a pure regular expression router in similar fashion to gsub? I imagine it working something like this: Merb::Router.prepare do |r| r.add %r[^/(.*)/(.*)/(\d+)$], :controller => ''\1'', :action => ''\2'', :id => ''\3'' r.add %r[^/user-(\d+)$], :user_id =>

I''m creating a message queue system, (think JMS message queue) Basically, I''ll be firing off an http request as soon as a row appears in a database. Now in past implementations I''ve done the following. 1. Polled the database every 0.10 seconds. 2. If something was there to work, I''d tag it as complete. 3. Create a separate thread. (no further database hits

I remember having this discussion on IRC before, so Ezra if you could remind me that would be appreciated: Why do we check for the existence of the controller file in (what is now) Request#controller_class? The reason I ask is that I would like to implement some sort of "Rails engine" like features for gem plugins--in other words, drop in a gem that has controllers/views etc.

I''m using merb as an application server backend for a client application, the goal is to be able to handle thousands of parallell sessions (not parallell requests). It will use sendfile to send files. The controller uses an singleton that saves sessions in a hash that is memory resident cross requests, but isn''t persistent otherwise. I''m using ActiveRecord since there

The following construct is an ActiveSupport-ism: returning(Foo.new) do |foo| ... end I don''t especially like it, since it''s both more verbose and less efficient than the direct alternative: foo = Foo.new ... foo It doesn''t occur many times in Merb, so does anyone agree with me that it should be removed? I tried doing this (patch attached) and I find

Hi people, just thought I''d mumble out my thoughts on merb''s apps directory structure and config concepts and see what other people are feeling... the app dir: mvc/application is layed out as expected....maybe without the mailer by default (another discussion) the config dir: I really think that it''s confusing to have such a mixture of ways to configure some

Heya Folks- This is mainly for Zed and Mentalguy. I have been playing with the new release of rubygems 0.9.0.8 and I have a major problem with the requirement that fastthread needs to be required before thread. Just requiring rubygems and then requiring fastthread right after that will throw the error: ez _blog $ ruby require ''rubygems'' require

I have been unable to install Microsoft Office 2000 under wine on several Fedora Linux machines. The problem seemed to start with the June 2004 release of wine and has persisted for every version I have tried up to and including the latest 12/01/2004 version. I have tried both RPM install and compiling from source with similar results. I have one machine running the May 2004 wine that

Is there a simple way to bootstrap merb directly from the Subversion repository, rather than first installing it as a gem? I can do the following if I already have an old gem lying around: merb -g testapp # using an old gem cd testapp rake merb:freeze_from_svn Unfortunately, that means I''m using an old version of the generator. So for example, when I just tried this,

I'm trying to install Office XP on Fedora 3, with the 12/1/2004 wine build from the source. I tried the suggestions given by Ronald Nave on Dec 2/2004 (installing DCOM98, windows installer), but to no avail, and I get the following errors, any help/suggestions are appreciated! ------------------------------------ fixme:wininet:FindFirstUrlCacheEntryA ((null), 0x7fd943b0, 0x5b41ea38): stub

Check it out here: http://pastie.textmate.org/92610 Let me know if you have any questions. Duane Johnson (canadaduane) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/merb-devel/attachments/20070830/c808d045/attachment.html

I''m following merb trunk. This morning I updated my gems, sync''d merb source and installed the merb gem from source. I don''t know if I did something wrong, or if a new gem messed things up, or if there was a merb change which broke something. Now I get this error: Request: REQUEST_URI: / (2007-11-05 20:27:04) Params: {"action"=>"index",

Hi All, Is anyone seeing this? $ merb merb_paste /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/merb-0.5.2/lib/merb/config.rb:69:in `parse_args'': uninitialized constant Merb::RELEASE (NameError) from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:785:in `initialize'' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/merb-0.5.2/lib/merb/config.rb:67:in `new'' from

I''m trying to get Merb running on Windows XP SP2 and am experiencing some difficulties. I load http://localhost:4000/posts/new in my browser expecting to see the contents of new.herb rendered. However the following error is reported: Request: PATH_INFO: /posts/new Params: {"action"=>"new", "id"=>nil, "controller"=>"posts"}

hi all, I want to move some routing tasks out of the router and into the controller. The goal is to make Merb feel less like mod_rewrite and give the user more control at the controller. The new Router is simple: it takes the path_info (not the whole request) then outputs a controller class and some parameters from the path matching. The rest of the routing would be done at the controller level.

FYI, I blogged about the new system here: http://blog.inquirylabs.com/ 2007/08/27/new-router-in-merb/ Duane Johnson (canadaduane)

Hi, I check out the last codes from merb repository. And the startup information for production environment just like that: ====================================================== dev:/var/www/apps/upload_merb/current/log# /etc/init.d/merb_init start Merb started with these options: --- :template_ext: :html: :herb :js: :jerb :xml: :xerb :config: dist/conf/upload.conf :drb_server_port: