similar to: Dovecot deliver logging problem and procmail

Hello, I'm trying to move from procmail to dovecot sieve. I found the translation script at http://www.dovecot.org/tools/procmail2sieve.pl It works well except the following use cases: * ^From:.*myemail at mydomain.com.* | formail -I"X-Priority: 2 (high)" -I"X-mydomain-com-seen: yes" | $SENDMAIL -oi \ myemail at mydomain2.com \ myemail at mydomain3.com :0c *

Hi, I have site w. around 7000 users, most of which have some procmail rules (theres even .procmailrc in /etc/skel with rule to put spam into spam folder). Afaik dovecot's deliver doesnt understand procmail rules, so i'd like to ask if its possible to configure procmail so it saves mail using deliver, without modifying users .procmailrc Thanks for any pointers, Vaclav Hula

Hello! As discussed in the previous thread about "Dovecot deliver logging problem and procmail" I have made a small patch for procmail to deliver through dovecot's deliver program (or any other delivery program). So Procmail does not write the mailboxes directly any more. So delivery is done through pipes and an external program which can deliver the files. Since dovecot's

Hello! Noone has running a sendmail/Mailscanner/procmail/mbox environment? Ciao, Gerhard ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 20:27:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerhard Wiesinger <lists at wiesinger.com> To: dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA with sendmail/Mailscanner Hello! I'm running dovecot in a sendmail/Mailscanner/procmail/mbox

(Using dovecot 1.0 RC7 on Fedora Core 5) <scene set> Hitherto we have used UW-IMAP on a "farm" of Linux machines mounting NFS from a NetApp. (The UW-IMAP author doesn't like use of NFS, but with careful use of NFS mount arguments ('noac,actimeo=0' etc.) and trying to ensure that all activity for a given user takes place within one machine in the farm, we seem to

Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: > From: D Chen <dchenusa at yahoo.com> > Date: April 19, 2012 4:06:49 PM PDT > To: lists-dovecot <replies-lists-a1z2-dovecot at listmail.innovate.net> > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] IMAP SSL incoming test need help ! > Reply-To: D Chen <dchenusa at yahoo.com> > > Thanks for nice pointing out in my mail.log! >

Thank you. This may be helpful. > On Nov 10, 2015, at 13:01, Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> wrote: > > > https://www.google.dk/search?q=procmailrc+to+sieve > > > have fun -- Vicki cfcl.com/vlb twitter.com/vlb

http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc3.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc3.tar.gz.sig Does this fix the hangs people have been reporting? - SSL connections hanged sometimes, especially when saving messages. - mbox: Mail bodies were saved with CR+LF linefeeds - Mail forwarding was broken with deliver/Sieve - dbox fixes. Might actually be usable now. - Index file handling

http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc3.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc3.tar.gz.sig Does this fix the hangs people have been reporting? - SSL connections hanged sometimes, especially when saving messages. - mbox: Mail bodies were saved with CR+LF linefeeds - Mail forwarding was broken with deliver/Sieve - dbox fixes. Might actually be usable now. - Index file handling

Hi all... How can deliver messages to a subfolder using the LDA? For example, I want a message to joe+spam at abc.com to be placed inside the 'spam' subfolder. Any hint is appreciated. Thanks ;)

Hello, I saw that OpenSSH release 6.7 removed all CBC ciphers by default. Is CBC therefore considered as broken and unsecure (in general or SSH implementation)? I also read a lot of references (see below) but still not clear to me what's the actual "security status" of CBC and why it has been removed in general. http://www.openssh.com/txt/release-6.7 sshd(8): The default set

On 15.06.2015 21:31, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > On 2015-06-15, Gerhard Wiesinger <lists at wiesinger.com> wrote: > >> I saw that OpenSSH release 6.7 removed all CBC ciphers by default. Is >> CBC therefore considered as broken and unsecure (in general or SSH >> implementation)? > CBC modes in SSH use the last encrypted block of the previous packet > as the IV

Hello, we are currently using sendmail, procmail, uwimap and qpopper. We are planing to replace uwimap and qpopper with dovecot. Which seems to be a very good idea :-) But: Sendmail and Procmail will not be replaced. Now I've realized that deliver rewrites existing "From <....> ..." header lines to ">From <...> ..." and adds it's own "From

Hello! I'm running squirrelmail 1.4.8 (I know this is not the latest version) and know I'm having troubles with: 1.) Folder list view 2.) Save to sent or Drafts folder. Configuration worked well. I think it has to do with the upgrade from dovecot 1.0 to 1.1 and the LIST command. Thunderbird/alpine work well. Commands from rawlog are: A002 LIST "" "~/Mail/Drafts"

On 05 Dec 2015, at 11:32, Gerhard Wiesinger <lists at wiesinger.com> wrote: > > Is it possible to configure the secure session caching mechanism? > e.g. like in nginx: https://bjornjohansen.no/optimizing-https-nginx I remember hearing about various security vulnerabilities in that earlier.. I guess they're fixed now then, unless people find more ways to exploit it. Anyway

http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc25.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc25.tar.gz.sig Instead of having "Should v1.0 be released already" discussion, how about having "What's still missing from wiki.dovecot.org and how could it be improved" discussion? And what should the wiki exported to doc/ directory in the tarball look like? * If time moves

http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc25.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc25.tar.gz.sig Instead of having "Should v1.0 be released already" discussion, how about having "What's still missing from wiki.dovecot.org and how could it be improved" discussion? And what should the wiki exported to doc/ directory in the tarball look like? * If time moves

i finally manage to control access on public folder by File system permission. i have 3 test users. 1. tom 2. fmaster 3 . testmail tom and fmaster are a group called "news-own" and testmail user is a readonly one. here is my folder structure ill share dovecot -n output at the end of this email. drwxrwxr-t 2 tom news-own 4.0K Dec 4 19:08 tmp drwxrwxr-t 2 tom news-own 4.0K Dec

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.5.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.5.tar.gz.sig A few announcements first: I'm now going to start being more strict about not answering Dovecot questions sent to me privately (especially support requests, but also bug reports, feature requests, etc). Often those questions could be answered by other people in the mailing list as

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.5.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.5.tar.gz.sig A few announcements first: I'm now going to start being more strict about not answering Dovecot questions sent to me privately (especially support requests, but also bug reports, feature requests, etc). Often those questions could be answered by other people in the mailing list as