Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Maildir, procmail, and locks"
2008 Jan 04
1
Random procmail filter failures.
Hi all,
I'm seeing a random issue with my procmail filters (only on email from
this list) where once every so often, it will fail to filter a
message. I am sorting by the to/cc email address, and this rule works
on 99.9% of posts, however every now and again, I see something like
this happen:
From centos-bounces at centos.org Sat Jan 5 01:57:28 2008
Subject: Re: [CentOS]
2009 Feb 02
1
OT: procmail recipe question
I'm trying to use procmail and I'm having trouble getting it to set some
headers. I have one mailing list that sets ?Newsgroups: in the header
and I want to remove it. I have the following test recipe:
:0
* ^Subject:.*\<testing
* ^(Mime-Version:|Content-)
| formail -IMime-Version: -IContent-
If I understand it correctly, it should remove the Mime-Verion and
Content headers.
The
2014 Jun 20
2
mail delivery question
I've built a new mail system with Centos 6.5, and I'm running fetchmail -
sendmail - procmail to maildir. I have all of this working at the moment.(I
know, postfix was the default, but for lots of other reasons, I switched, and
that isn't an issue, I don't think).
I am using dovecot as an imap server. Procmail won't update indexes during email
delivery, so I'm having some
2013 Aug 18
3
Using procmail to mark messages as read in dovecot
So, I use procmail extensively, and I have for a long time, but marking messages as 'read' in a Maildir has always been a little wonky:
TRAP='mv "$LASTFOLDER" "${LASTFOLDER}:2,S"'
Since I've switched to dovecot, is there a way to mark a message on delivery as read or not new or seen?
--
Clarke's Law: Sufficiently advanced technology is
2009 Jan 16
2
Procmail + Dovecot
I have been trying to set up procmail but I am running into some issues
with using deliver. I am running Debian Etch with Dovecot 1.1.8 compiled
from the Debian Experimental source package.
##### Start .procmailrc #####
# System-wide settings for procmail
SHELL="/bin/bash"
SENDMAIL="/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -t"
LOGFILE="/var/log/procmail.log"
2014 Nov 21
1
Centos 6.6 procmail trouble
I have a 6.5 machine that had everything set up and working correctly (fetchmail, sendmail w/ starttls, procmail, spamassassin) but the MB cratered.
I bought a new machine, and installed Centos 6.6 and all is not well.
I used the config from the previous incarnation (via backups) for fetchmail (works fine), sendmail (works fine for sending via relay and tls), but procmail now refuses to pick up
2008 Feb 18
2
Strange Error
Hello Everybody,
I?m trying to make a work with procmail and deliver on Fedora 7. Part of
flow are the following:
- procmail get the mail from Sendmail
- procmail ask to deliver/dovecot if have any retriction (sizer mailbox,
etc)
- procmail put the mail on inbox user.
I had include the following line in the promail config:
| "/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -m $DEFAULT"
and the
2004 Feb 06
1
Illegal characters in message names
Hi all
I've set up Dovecot to use maildir-storage according to the previous
hint from Blair Zajac, and it's working perfectly. However, I still
have a problem with the way procmail wants to name the received emails.
The following is a slightly modified extract from my logs:
procmail: [5373] Thu Feb 5 23:59:14 2004
procmail: Assigning "MAILDIR=/Users/name/Maildir/"
2009 Dec 28
6
Dovecot-deliver sometimes fails when message set to discard via sieve
Hi, sometimes mails that i discard via sieve gets delivered to my inbox
and i can not figure out why. So i hope you can give me a hint.
My setup is:
I use a self compiled dovecot 1.2.4 with installed sieve and managesieve
plugin.
Incoming mails a processed by Postfix and the delivered to Procmail.
Procmail invokes Spamassassin and discard all mails marked as spam. The
other mails are passed to
2008 May 22
1
procmail --> deliver question
Hi there,
I use dovecot-1.1-rc4, got imap, imaps, pop3 & pop3s working fine with the mbox format.
I use sendmail-8.14.2 as an MTA, sendmail uses procmail as an LDA.
I migrated to maildir format now, and pipe all my mail to deliver right now to be able to make use of the indexing etc...
Problem is I run into some errors :
#My .procmailrc
PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin
2016 Oct 12
2
Roaming Profiles with Windows ACLs
On 10/12/2016 1:34 PM, Mark Nienberg via samba wrote:
> Well, the easy fix is to add this to the share definition:
>
> admin users = "@STA\domain admins"
>
> The wiki implies that this should not be necessary, so I don't know if the
> wiki is wrong or if I failed to follow it correctly. This was my first
> share using Windows ACLS and it was an interesting
2016 Oct 13
1
Roaming Profiles with Windows ACLs
On 10/12/2016 7:32 PM, Mark Nienberg wrote:
> Yes, it looks like this:
>
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Implementing_roaming_profiles#Profile_share_using_Windows_ACLs
>
> but as I say, it works now that I have added the admin users, so I am
> satisfied for now.
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:31 AM, lingpanda101--- via samba
> <samba at lists.samba.org
2008 Feb 27
2
deliver & procmail
hi together,
procmail provides an error by delivery.
procmail: Executing "/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver,Maildir"
procmail: Error while writing to "/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver"
procmail: Program failure (64) of "/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver"
procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver Maildir"
From
2007 Apr 02
1
home shares and thunderbird profiles
We find it convenient to keep thunderbird email client profiles on our home shares
rather than in our user profiles, as is the default. From time to time some users
experience the dreaded "delayed write failed" error for certain thunderbird files.
The only solution seems to be to log off and log on again. (after clicking OK to
accept the error about seven times).
We are sharing
2008 Dec 08
1
samba on quad core vs dual core
For a new file server that doesn't really do much other than run samba, is there any
advantage to quad core CPUs vs dual core? Say the two options are equivalent in price.
Thanks,
Mark
2007 Apr 13
6
Duplicate E-mail Problem
Hello all,
Definitely congrats on the 1.0.0 release!
Anyway, I'm having a problem, that may or may not be related to
Dovecot. Specifically, duplicate (and sometimes triplicate) emails are
appearing. These emails have exactly the same queue ID, so its not that
they were sent multiple times. These dup emails do not show up to me ever.
Postfix is being used as the SMTP, and it hands it
2016 Oct 08
2
Roaming Profiles with Windows ACLs
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Rowland Penny via samba <
samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> have you given Domain Admins the required rights ?
>
> net rpc rights grant DOMAIN\\"Domain Admins"
> SeDiskOperatorPrivilege -UAdministrator
>
Yes. I followed this wiki example:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Shares_with_Windows_ACLs
Here is some output:
[nienberg at
2009 Aug 25
2
migrating DOS attributes
I've decided to modernize my samba installation by switching to storing dos
attributes as extended attributes on the linux file sytem. It would be nice to
convert the dos attributes that are currently "mapped" into the new extended attributes.
I found this page on the samba wiki:
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Migration_Tools
but the link to the perl script is dead and the
2006 Jul 05
1
moving public folders to private Trash
Using Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 against dovecot beta9:
If a user has Thunderbird configured to move deleted messages into a Trash folder,
then the user cannot delete folders in a public namespace. There is no problem
deleting messages.
Thunderbird says:
"The current command did not succeed. The mail server responded: Can't rename
mailbox to another storage type."
All mailboxes
2007 Apr 14
2
minor public folder problem still in v1.0.0
This minor problem still exists in the current version.
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2006-December/018251.html
It's my own fault, I kept meaning to test one of the latest versions before the 1.0
release and never got around to it. Oh well, just mentioning it so it stays on the
list of things to do.
1.0.0 update from RC15 went smoothly here.
Thanks,
Mark Nienberg