similar to: CentosPlus Kernel coward

I get a message while booting of: ide2: I/O resource 0x3EE-0x3EE not free. ide2: ports already in use, skipping probe Googling for this, I find it is relatively common, and on different laptops. I thought it might be my internal SD reader causing the problems, but these other notebooks do not have such devices. Then I found: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~pb22/I8600/ and: " IrDA -

greeting. a short while ago, i may have gone to a site i should not have. maybe. after visiting, i decided i would check for rpm updates. when yumex opened to available packages, it showed that; openssl.x86_64 0:1.0.1e-42.el6_7.4 was available, so i checked it, then clicked install button. during log display, i got error message, tried again. still got error. seems that there is a

Hi, Just a quick note to see if anyone else noted the changes in yum in the updates. I've disabled thhe new format until i can verify if it works? As i rebuilt yumex from Scientific Linux (RHEL SRPM rebuild) and i have not enabled centosplus i don't wanna mess my system. I don't believe you can browse the new mirrors. __________________________________________________ Do You

On 2016-05-17 12:09, jd1008 wrote: > Has anybody enabled this repo? > I understand that it can really mess up updates and upgrades > as the dependencies are rather different. I've had the CentOSPlus repository enabled for CentOS6 for more than a year with no problems. I don't recall reading anything on this mailing list or IRC suggesting that enabling plus caused issues with

On 17 May 2016 20:52, "Mauricio Tavares" <raubvogel at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:04 PM, <cpolish at surewest.net> wrote: > > On 2016-05-17 12:09, jd1008 wrote: > >> Has anybody enabled this repo? > >> I understand that it can really mess up updates and upgrades > >> as the dependencies are rather different. >

quite possibly more a yum question than a centos question, but i'm a bit confused about the difference between listing "available" packages versus "updates" packages. short example -- listing what the yum man page suggests should be "available" for installation, restricting myself to centosplus: $ yum list available --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=centosplus ...

Hello List, I have a regular install of centos 4.4 i386 (lately updated to 4.5), a new application needs mysql > 5.0.x The natural way to do this was: yum --enablerepo=centosplus update mysql However, after all the dependency / transaction checks.. i get this.. Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================= Package Arch

I have a Centos 4 box that has been updated all the way to 4.6 without using the centosplus repository. Now I want to use the centosplus repository for Centos 4 to get the latest LAMP, mod_perl, perl and other perl modules so that I can install rt 3.6.6 and its necessary modules. However, for some reason, the latest perl package in the centosplus repository does not appear on the radar when

While trying to get my SD card reader to work with CentOS, it was recommended to me that I update to the centosplus kernel. I attempted to do so using yum, as was recommended, but I encountered the following error: [root at localhost ~]# yum --enablerepo=centosplus update kernel Repository update already added, not adding again Error getting repository data for centosplus, repository not

Hello, First of all thanks to the poster on the wiki for centosplus. I've configed it added include and exclude lines, do i need the centos-priority plugin? I want to enable centosplus to use the centosplus kernel and the centosplus webstack. Below are my base, updates, and centosplus repo definitions. I'm getting an error when i do a yum update that a dependency for postfix

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:04 PM, <cpolish at surewest.net> wrote: > On 2016-05-17 12:09, jd1008 wrote: >> Has anybody enabled this repo? >> I understand that it can really mess up updates and upgrades >> as the dependencies are rather different. > > I've had the CentOSPlus repository enabled for CentOS6 for more > than a year with no problems. I don't

Hi, https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-586.html backported to compile agaist CentOS-3 level software. This is my bad. I forgot the damn thing while the firefox security update came out. ia64: centosplus/ia64/RPMS/firefox-1.0.6-1.4.1.centos3.ia64.rpm centosplus/ia64/SRPMS/firefox-1.0.6-1.4.1.centos3.src.rpm s390: centosplus/s390/RPMS/firefox-1.0.6-1.4.1.centos3.s390.rpm

My update method on two critical systems has been to use yumex. I select all, unselect major apps that I recognize (bind, openssh, etc), update and reboot. The yumex to get those apps and another reboot (most likely not needed). I have updated my notebook. The only detected problems are: madwifi drivers and lost Thunderbird icons in drawers (just had to go through the properties and

Hi, yum-2.4 and required dependancies for CentOS-3 are now available for i386 and x86_64 in the centosplus repository. The default version still is 2.0, nothing changes for those who don't want/need the new features (for example: fastestmirror, priorities and protectbase). For those who don't want to update to yum-2.4 but still use the centosplus repository, add to your /etc/yum.conf

Hey All, I'm trying to upgrade to perl 5.8.8 via CentOSPlus, but am having no luck. Here is what I have done. # yum list | grep perl . . . perl.i386 3:5.8.5-12.1 installed . . . Created /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo with: #additional packages that extend functionality of existing packages [centosplus] name=CentOS-$releasever - Plus

Hi Centos maintainers ! Could You please refresh repo data for centosplus reposytory 4 ? There are new kernels rpms, but repo index files arn't updated. Please fix that. For example: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/centosplus/x86_64/ rpm from 20 oct 2010 but meatadata from 28 sep 2010 ... P.S: That was 17 nov 2010 fixed for centosplus 5 repo, but centosplus 4 was omitted. Best regards,

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:808 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-808.html This update is for the CENTOSPLUS repository only. We were waiting to roll in new code for the xfs file system from SGI, but that code is not yet ready. This release of the CENTOSPLUS kernel has the 2.6.9-22.0.1.EL code from upstream and is built like the previous CENTOSPLUS kernels with all the same

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:808 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-808.html This update is for the CENTOSPLUS repository only. We were waiting to roll in new code for the xfs file system from SGI, but that code is not yet ready. This release of the CENTOSPLUS kernel has the 2.6.9-22.0.1.EL code from upstream and is built like the previous CENTOSPLUS kernels with all the same

On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 07:57:16AM +0300, Pasi Pirhonen wrote: > Hi, > > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-586.html > ... i386 and x86_64 rebuilds i386: centosplus/i386/RPMS/firefox-1.0.6-1.4.1.centos3.i386.rpm centosplus/i386/SRPMS/firefox-1.0.6-1.4.1.centos3.src.rpm x86_64: centosplus/x86_64/RPMS/firefox-1.0.6-1.4.1.centos3.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CEEA-2005:434 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-434.html It's the same firefox modified to build for CentOS-3 as the previous provided one is vulnerable too. The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: centosplus/s390/RPMS/firefox-1.0.4-1.4.1.centos3.s390.rpm s390x: