similar to: LDA Plugin Maybe?

Johannes, do you have any plans (regarding your dspam plugin) to: a) Integrate it into libdspam rather than calling the dspam binary? b) Any ideas for scaling it better, and implementing it scaled better? I notice a slight discussion about scaling, and you have chosen not to pursue it. Is that because it's too hard, or just because you don't need to? Thanks Tim p.s. If I knew how to use

On 4/19/06, Johannes Berg <johannes at sipsolutions.net> wrote: > On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 22:56 +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote: > > > libdspam instead of system("dspam...") > > That's a lot of work, how about calling to the dspam server instead? I'm about to start building a system for ~10,000 users, using dovecot, and was going to use dspam with it... Is

Firstly, if you're out of quota for example, and using postfix, will it need to send a bounce email, or will it do the out of quota error at SMTP time? (preferred) Also, I want a global sieve script to run first, REGARDLESS if the user has their own script. # If there is no user-specific Sieve-script, global Sieve script is # executed if set. #global_script_path = This suggests to me,

Hi, I've found the dovecot dspam plugin and looked at the code. I forks and calls the dspam binary for every mail. I didn't like this behavior, so I've migrated it to use libdspam. The plugin still needs more love: * Use cmake instead of a Makefile * Make the spam folder configurable in the dovecot.conf * Code cleanup and more comments. Please test. Comments and patches are welcome

Sparked from the discussion on the list, I've put my antispam plugin into git and split up the code into a frontend and possibly multiple backends. See http://git.sipsolutions.net/dovecot-antispam.git/ (URL functions as both gitweb and git URL) Andreas, I took your README file and adjusted it, I hope you don't mind. I didn't fork from your git tree because you'd already

hello, i added the dovecot-dspam-plugin [1] to my dovecot-installation. when trying to move a mail out of or into the predefined spamfolder with thunderbird a messagebox shows : "dspam failed" and the message remains in its original position. i am using virtual mail users contained in a postgresql-database [2]. normal imap access and dspam training from the commandline works fine.

Hi, I see http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/Projects/dovecot-antispam and http://blog.cynapses.org/2007/09/13/dovecot-dspam-plugin/ solutions. Second git repo is not answer, first one is cloned, but I see some drawbacks with it. Dspam backend is more native solution but libdspam using instead of dspam external binary looks like preffered way to integrate dspam. Another problem is waiting for

This email /was/ going to be a bit of a bitch about trying to get mysql compiled in to a dovecot plugin, but I got it all working before I finished the email! :-D Ok, basically what I am doing (Johannes permission) is modifying the dspam plugin, so that it instead talks to a database (MySQL in this case), and updates a table, so that you can do the actual training at a time of lower load. It

I'm hoping to take advantage of authentication caching via dovecot-auth. I see that posfix can communicate with Dovecot-Auth, via SASL, but from what I can see, postfix only does this for authentication checks. Not 100% sure how postfix handles virtual_transport (I assume it needs to do a lookup via virtual_mailbox_maps), but I can't see anyway to get virtual_mailbox_maps to use

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, St?phane Cottin wrote: > I'm using qmail + dspam + dovecot-lda. > > A typical .qmail file : > > | /usr/bin/dspam --client --deliver=stdout --user "$EXT@$USER" | /usr/bin/preline -f /usr/lib/dovecot/dovecot-lda -d "$EXT@$USER" -a "$EXT@$USER" -m "$EXT2" > > When

St?phane Cottin writes: > A typical .qmail file : > > | /usr/bin/dspam --client --deliver=stdout --user "$EXT@$USER" | /usr/bin/preline -f /usr/lib/dovecot/dovecot-lda -d "$EXT@$USER" -a "$EXT@$USER" -m "$EXT2" > > When dspam segfault or is killed, preline receive an empty content and > only pass to dovecot-lda two headers ( Return-Path

Hello, I?m using dspam 3.6.3 in combination with Dovecot, procmail and Sendmail. Everything works fine but I want to replace procmail by dovecot-LDA. A few changes to dspam.conf results in a takeover by dovecot-LDA. Unfortunately this is where it goes awry; besides the ?d argument (user), dspam also supplies the ?f argument (fromwhom). The use of the ?f argument results in an error because

Hi, I'm using qmail + dspam + dovecot-lda. A typical .qmail file : | /usr/bin/dspam --client --deliver=stdout --user "$EXT@$USER" | /usr/bin/preline -f /usr/lib/dovecot/dovecot-lda -d "$EXT@$USER" -a "$EXT@$USER" -m "$EXT2" When dspam segfault or is killed, preline receive an empty content and only pass to dovecot-lda two headers ( Return-Path and

I'm trying to get dovecot to work as an LDA with dspam; so I can run the dspam dovecot plugin for drag and drop spam/ham learning. Here is my config info: Version 1.0.5 base_dir: /var/run/dovecot/ protocols: imap imaps pop3 pop3s ssl_cipher_list: ALL:!LOW login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable(default): /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(imap):

St?phane Cottin writes: > dspam already send errors to syslog, the point here is to never loose > email contents. This was a wrong design, i'm now use a wrapper instead > ( see my previous post for details ). You're stilling going to lose contents. If dspam fails, the mail is dumped, the LDA returns exit code 75, and the MTA will probably issue a bounce Email to the sender.

Hello, Is there any possibility to make dspam transport validated emails directly to dovecot LDA? for now I use such schema: postfix > dspam > postfix > dovecot LDA but wanted to not return emails to postfix. I've found that such configuration is possible with dspam+ cyrus IMAP. Documentation of dovecot is great but I haven't found such solution. Thanks in advance for any

Am 26.01.2015 um 10:52 schrieb St?phane Cottin: >> Le 26 janv. 2015 ? 10:09, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> a ?crit : >>>> You're stilling going to lose contents. If dspam fails, the mail >>>> is dumped, the LDA returns exit code 75, and the MTA will probably >>>> issue a bounce Email to the sender. >>> >>> which

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 25 Jan 2015, Joseph Tam wrote: > St?phane Cottin writes: > >> dspam already send errors to syslog, the point here is to never loose >> email contents. This was a wrong design, i'm now use a wrapper instead >> ( see my previous post for details ). > > You're stilling going to lose contents. If dspam

St?phane Cottin writes: >> You're stilling going to lose contents. If dspam fails, the mail >> is dumped, the LDA returns exit code 75, and the MTA will probably >> issue a bounce Email to the sender. > > from dovecot-lda man page : > > 75 A temporary failure. This is returned for almost all failures. See the log file for > details.

Hi all, I'm enjoying using dovecot deliver with qmail+vpopmail+dspam. It works mostly fine, I like the indexing and sieve features with dovecot deliver. I would like to get more details on trouble, the log entry is just : " 2009-11-18_20:38:55.64778 delivery 50833: deferral: " As you see, there no reason for the deferral. How can I make deliver more verbose ? I also have a