similar to: mbox-sync-update.c error

Hi I am testing FC5 before upgrading my main server and I am getting errors with dovecot 1.0 beta3 - both the distributed RPM and also the one at ATrpms thunderbird (the distributed version which is thunderbird-1.5-6) I am running both dovecot and thunderbird on the same machine, pointing thunderbird at 127.0.0.1 for its imap server. The symptoms are an inability to access mail -

Hi One Wed I posted the following message and have had no replies. I am reposting as I think this is a Dovecot bug but I am not sure. If anyone can assist on this I'd be most grateful. Tks ----------------------------------------------------- Hi I am testing FC5 before upgrading my main server and I am getting errors with dovecot 1.0 beta3 - both the distributed RPM and also the

Hello, i have following problems using dovecot-antispam plugin (Dovecot >1.1.3, FreeBSD 8.0-Current, dovecot-antispam 1.0/1.1) dovecot-antispam compiled using dspam-exec/mailtrain, with/wo debugging (i've tried all possibilities) When i try to move message to SPAM folder (using dspam-exec backend) i'm getting IMAP error: antispam signature not found and in dovecot logs: Nov 23 23:44:24

Hello, I'm trying to configure the dovecot-antispam plugin. Now I've run into a problem: whenever I try to move/copy a message in/from the spam mailbox, Thunderbird (and also Sylpheed, haven't tried anything else) says: The current command did not succeed. The mail server responded: Failed to read mail beginning. and in the logs I get: dovecot: Aug 07 10:41:23 Error:

We've joined an RODC to the domain (Windows 2008R2 running a W2003 FFL/DFL AD) but are getting these errors on first startup. It was joined with: samba-tool domain join main.adlab.netdirect.ca RODC --realm=main.adlab.netdirect.ca --username=administrator at main.adlab.netdirect.ca --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ but we get these errors right after startup: Nov 28 12:35:27 sles-bree samba[3939]:

I just checked the SOA records on my samba DCs and noticed a few oddities: michael at sles-bree:~> for i in ad{1..4} sles-bree sles-shire; do host -t soa main.adlab.netdirect.ca $i | grep SOA; done main.adlab.netdirect.ca has SOA record ad1.main.adlab.netdirect.ca. hostmaster.main.adlab.netdirect.ca. 177 900 600 86400 3600 main.adlab.netdirect.ca has SOA record ad2.main.adlab.netdirect.ca.

Is this a problem? Does this mean no replication links exist? michael at sles-bree:~> samba-tool drs showrepl -k yes Bree\SLES-BREE DSA Options: 0x00000025 DSA object GUID: 7ea641b0-d418-4c74-a4fa-c15b852467b8 DSA invocationId: 1017ff29-756c-4777-b395-b481f4b5387c ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== ==== OUTBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== ==== KCC CONNECTION OBJECTS ==== Connection -- Connection name:

I've set up a lab for testing Samba 4.1 as an RODC emulating a satellite office setup, using the sernet packages on SLES11SP2. ## Problem 1 samba_dnsupdate is failing: ==> /var/log/samba/log.samba <== [2013/11/18 13:22:37.416193, 0] ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:317(samba_runcmd_io_handler) /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure [2013/11/18

Timo, Attached is gdb information from core dumps related to the following assert in test-80: IMAP(username): file mbox-sync-update.c: line 442 (mbox_sync_update_header_from): assertion failed: (ctx->mail.uid == 0 || ctx->mail.uid_broken || ctx->mail.uid == mail->uid) My setup: Solaris 9, mbox format. test-80 compiled with gcc 4.0.1 using the following configure options: CC=gcc

Using 1.1.2. I'm getting the above message over and over in the error log. Dovecot drops the connection and the client (Tbird) just keeps retrying in an endless loop. Using Wireshark to sniff the exchange, it looks like the command that fails looks like this: 5 UID fetch 1:9749,9751:9763,9765:9930,9932,9934:9942 (UID RFC822.SIZE FLAGS BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS (From To Cc Subject Date

Use the HS hook to completely generate the HS BL descriptor, similarly to what is done in the LS hook, instead of (arbitrarily) using the acr_v1 format as an intermediate. This allows us to make the bootloader descriptor structures private to each implementation, resulting in a cleaner an more consistent design. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> ---

The actual alpha4 release this time. With a few changes since the pre-release. The important changes again: - Default lock_method changed to flock instead of the old fcntl. Solaris users will need to set it back to fcntl. This makes sure that Dovecot's indexes aren't accidentally used with NFS. - IMAP: We might have sent extra EXPUNGE messages when output buffer got full. This could

Same as reported before: Assert: IMAP(user): file mbox-sync-update.c: line 442 (mbox_sync_update_header_from): assertion failed: (ctx->mail.uid == 0 || ctx->mail.uid_broken || ctx->mail.uid == mail->uid) Setup: 1.0alpha1 on Solaris 9, built with gcc 4.0.1 Debug output of the core is attached. Jeff Earickson Colby College -------------- next part -------------- Script started on

Just a reminder: Meet in the Bree Louise near Euston http://www.beerintheevening.com/pubs/s/40/4034/Bree_Louise/Euston for some real ale from around 18:30 Paul --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To

I would like to get samba4 working with AD and rfc2307 attributes, while allowing the nice remote management available via samba4. Using sernet-samba packages on 4.1.3-7.el6.x86_64 CentOS 6. I have samba4 configured as follows: krb5.conf: [libdefaults] default_realm = MAIN.ADLAB.NETDIRECT.CA dns_lookup_realm = true dns_lookup_kdc = true ticket_lifetime = 24h renew_lifetime = 7d forwardable =

Hi, An assertion that I haven't seen before: Apr 20 11:15:32 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(user): file mbox-sync-rewrite.c: line 106 (mbox_sync_headers_add_space): assertion failed: (start_pos < data_size) gdb output from the core file of imap is attached. My setup: Solaris 9, mbox format, INBOX is NFS mounted from a Solaris 10 system, imap and imaps only. Jeff Earickson

Timo, My first assert in beta2. Syslog said: Jan 24 09:57:16 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] imap(user): Cached message offset 94625 is invalid for mbox file /var/mail/m/user Jan 24 09:57:16 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] imap(user): file mbox-sync.c: line 1471 (mbox_sync_do): assertion failed: (!sync_ctx->mbox->mbox_sync_dirty || (flags & MBOX_SYNC_UNDIRTY) == 0) Gdb

Add secure-boot for the dGPU set of GM20X chips, using the PMU as the high-secure falcon. This work is based on Deepak Goyal's initial port of Secure Boot to Nouveau. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> --- drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/secboot.h | 2 + drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c | 2 + drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gm200.c | 8 +-

Hi, I've been running 1.0alpha1 in production since August 18, and got my first assert and core yesterday. Otherwise it has been running flawlessly. My setup: Sun E220R, Solaris 9, compiled dovecot with gcc 4.0.1, configured dovecot like so: #!/usr/bin/sh VERSION=1.0-alpha1 CC=gcc CFLAGS="-g -O" CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/openssl/include LDFLAGS=-L/opt/openssl/lib \ ./configure

Hi everyone, Apologies for the big patchset. This is a rework of the secure boot code that moves the building of the blob into its own set of source files (and own hooks), making the code more flexible and (hopefully) easier to understand as well. This rework is needed to support more signed firmware for existing and new chips. Since the firmwares in question are not available yet I cannot send