similar to: operation not supported ?

Hey folks, Let me start by saying I really love what I see so far! Dovecot seems to be extremely feature-rich, and unlike a lot of free software the documentation is extremely good! I gave up on courier IMAP because of the poor documentation, and I have to say Dovecot sure differentiates itself in that area! Unfortunately I still can't get it going :-/ First thing I noticed is that

Hi everybody, we try to migrate our IMAP service from uw-imap to dovecot because of horrible server slowdown when a lot of people poking in theirs huge imap folders. So, I try to run testing instance of dovecot on different imap port (12143) I have trouble with authentication by PAM module of MIT Kerberos. It successfuly works for authentificate users of wu-imap but not for dovecot. I see in

>>> Hi all >>> >>> Thanks to Milan I am able to get further with xen and reiser4 >>> >>> - In swap line 6 and 7 status_flags.c >>> >>> #include <linux/bio.h> >>> #include <linux/page-flags.h> >>> >>> >>> - PACKED is redefined, but the definitions are the same, so the gcc >>>

hello trying to install dovecot 2 on a fresh installed machine I get this error message : doveconf -n > dovecot-new.conf doveconf: Error: ssl enabled, but ssl_cert not set doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf: ssl enabled, but ssl_cert not set the ssl config file look like the following : Thanks for any info. ## ## SSL settings ## # SSL/TLS

Hello We are facing a boring trouble with multi OB boot machines that access to our samba server. All machines authenticate to samba PDC ( linux debian etch + windows ) It appears when machines windows's bootup the shared secret is changed by windows if we reboot the same machine under Linux it cannot authenticate anymore because Linux does NOT change the shared secret ... The machines

Hello Does anyone succeded in joining a Samba PDC with a NetApp filer ? I tried many times but never succeded ... Any infos welcome. Thanks

Can anyone help with some pointers to debug a problem with Samba and CTDB with smbstatus traversing the connections tdb? I've got a new two node cluster with Samba and CTDB on AIX. If I run smbstatus when the server has much user activity it hangs and the node it was run on gets banned. I see the following in the ctdb log: 2014/10/29 11:12:45.374580 [3932342]:

There are three applications that have their mitts on files on my mail server, which is running AIXV5.3 and UWIMAP and mbox format. The mail folders and INBOXES are native to that machine, but also are NFS exported to a login server and a mailing list server. All three machines are running the lockd daemon. Everybody wants to lock differently 1) procmail (delivering for sendmail), which

Hi - I'm trying to verify if OpenSSH/SFTP will in fact lock files with advisory file locking in Linux. I can test locking with the linux "flock" command to verify that file locking does work - but when I upload or download a file with SFTP it will not detect a lock. I'm asking about Linux specifically because about a year ago I was doing a similar process in Solaris 9 and

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Since we started our new Samba + LDAP backend server yesterday some (not all) PC we have a problem with Word and Excel files that are marked "read-only" when users are trying to open them from their Samba network shares. This happen ONLY for *.doc and *.xls files , if we open and save a *.html file with Word it works ... Any

Hello I got this error message yesterday evening for a user I've checked LDA error log it happened 6 times in 3 days for 5 differents users, not much but I wonder what's going on as actually the server is moderately loaded ( Easter holidays ) we have currently 250/300 IMAP processes , in "normal" production time we have approx 1000 IMAP processes running. Apr 14 19:24:37

Hi, I'm running 1.0rc6 on Solaris/SPARC, compiled myself against openssl. Client is Evolution 2.6.2 on my gentoo x86 laptop. As Dovecot is not yet productive, we run it parallel to UW-imap, on other ports. I use TLS. If I configure my evolution client with server-type IMAP, everything works fine. However, dovecot claims IMAP4rev1 support. However, when I set server-type to IMAP4rev1 in

I have Dovecot 1.0 in trial use by the IT staff, and have some locking questions Background, the mail server runs procmail, sendmail and NFS exports the user homedir and mailbox to a) a login shell host and b) a mailing list services host. It runs UWIMAP on the usual ports and dovecot on a arbitrary port number. Because of concern with NFS and file access contention. I have the following

Hi, I'm writing an application with C under Linux and I'm trying to use the flock system function to lock a file of an NT4 Server over Samba. The problem is that the lock works well within the same machine but if it is a process on another machine (the same program) the one that tries to access the locked file, the process is not blocked until the lock is released but given full access

/etc/postfix/main.cf.default: mailbox_delivery_lock = flock, dotlock Is flock equivalent to dovecot's fnctl locking? For mbox what type of locking settings should I be using? (No NFS, only local filesystem.) Warren Togami warren at togami.com

While experimenting a bit, I found that for some reason, locking indexes with flock is problematic, but only if user is taken from passwd-file. The host system is openbsd 3.9, dovecot's configuration is added at the bottom. Authentication is from two places - first from mentioned passwd-file, then from passwd file using bsdauth (in this case, there're no problems with flock). So, if

Hello I'm in trouble upgrading samba from 3.4.3 to 3.5.2 with Debian Lenny (AMD64) I use compiled (without error) version if samba with such options Any info welcome , thanks ! --prefix=/usr/local/samba-3.5.2' '--with-fhs' '--enable-shared' '--enable-static' '--disable-pie' '--with-pammodulesdir=/lib/security' '--with-pam'

Hi, I see samba with ctdb locking has following mapping when kernel oplocks = yes. share mode reservations = flock(2) posix byte range locking = fcntl(2) SMB locks (mandatory) = ctdb using brlock.tdb oplocks = fcntl(2) using F_SETLEASE Am I correct or I am missing something? I hope only SMB range locks are implemented with tdb, all else are being used from filesystem. What

Hello, I am trying to mount a lustre filesystem thru an ib2ip gateway. The MDS''s have infiniband connections. The client nodes are tcp/ip connections. I am able to route between the client nodes and the MDS''s. I have the following in /etc/fstab: abe-mds1 at o2ib0,abe-mds2 at o2ib0:/home/client /abehome lustre _netdev,flock 0 0 I get the following when trying

Hi, tl;dr summary of below: flock() works, but what does it take to make sync()/fsync() work in a 3 node GFS cluster? I am under the impression that POSIX flock, POSIX fcntl(F_SETLK/F_GETLK,...), and POSIX read/write/sync/fsync are all supported in cluster operations, such that in theory, SQLite3 should be able to atomically lock the file (or a subset of page), modify pages, flush the pages to