Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "POP3 extension to accept UIDL ranges?"
2003 Nov 02
1
[POP3] RFC2449 conformance?
RFC2449 Section 5 ("Capabilities available in the AUTHORIZATION state MUST
be announced in both states.") requires that POP3 extensions offered in
Authentication state MUST be offered in Transaction state as well, this
affects the "SASL" extension.
This is a CVS version that is a couple of days old (the old 0.99.10
wouldn't run on Linux 2.6 because it has tighter
2006 Sep 26
1
fetchmail can't talk to dovecot
Hello,
I have dovecot q1.0-0_22.rc7 up and running on a server: I can read
email from squirrelmail just fine. When I try to download email with
fetchmail, however, I get the result below. Why is that happening? In
dovecot.conf I have:
protocols = imap imaps pop3,
so why should pop3 or imap fail? Where should I look?
(I'll fix the certificates problem after I've managed to get in
2004 Dec 08
1
SQL + AUTH command bug?
Hi,
While investigating the problem with Thunderbird auths I found the
following happening:
Escape character is '^]'.
+OK Dovecot ready.
CAPA
+OK
CAPA
TOP
USER
UIDL
RESP-CODES
PIPELINING
SASL PLAIN
.
AUTH PLAIN
+
+
+
-ERR Authentication failed.
This is what is happening during a Thunderbird connection, when each '+'
happens dovecot does an sql query on the sql server for user
2009 Oct 05
1
dovecot 1.0.15 upgrading to dovecot 1.1.x or 1.2.x, and POP3 UIDL issue
Hi,
We're upgrading a cluster of servers from v1.0.15 to
v1.1.x or v1.2.x. It appears that the UIDL generation mechanism
has changed, and thus we'll be getting POP3 dups with users
that leave mail on server (which is a nasty practice, I know).
From checking the sources, and performing a number of controlled
tests in various scenarios, here is the outcome:
upgrade from 1.0.15 to
2010 Jan 27
3
How do I make dovecot not use sslv2 for pop?
From nmap:
995/tcp open ssl/pop3 Dovecot pop3d
|_ sslv2: server still supports SSLv2
|_ pop3-capabilities: USER CAPA UIDL PIPELINING RESP-CODES TOP
SASL(PLAIN LOGIN)
pop3 allows SSLv2, imap doesn't. In my dovecot.conf I have:
ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!LOW:!SSLv2
at the global level. Do I need to put it inside the protocol pop3{}
section?
Patrick
2004 Sep 02
1
Dovecots pop3-UIDL command impl. not RFC compliant ?
Hi !
POP3-RFC (1939) speaks about UIDL command:
The unique-id of a message is an arbitrary server-determined
string, consisting of one to 70 characters in the range 0x21
to 0x7E, which uniquely identifies a message within a maildrop and which
persists across sessions.
When I issue an UIDL command (dovecot 0.99.10.9)
I get replies like
1 1093990148.1
2 1093990148.2
3 1093990148.3
...
.
You see
2007 Oct 11
1
UIDL format for old UW pop3
Hi,
we're trying to migrate from UW imap 2001a-10, which doesn't seem to use the
UIDL format documented in the wiki. It seems to use a 16 character long MD5
hash of something. I've tried configuring Dovecot to do the same but the
value comes out differently.
The main thing that I can see is getting in the way is that the UIDL format
is not documented sufficiently. There is no
2006 Feb 12
1
Problems with POP3 UIDL when migrating from MBOX to Maildir
Hello,
I am in the process of migrating a hosting setup from UW-IMAP to
Dovecot. The protocols available to mail clients are IMAP and POP3
both before and after migration. I also wanted to change the mail
storage format from MBOX to Maildir. However, at this point I hit a
major snag with Dovecot and POP3 UIDL (unique identification listing
for POP3 mailboxes).
Several of the customers connecting
2004 Feb 14
1
[PATCH] POP3: Fix RFC1939 non-compliance in STAT, LIST and UIDL commands
Hi all,
attached is a patch against 0.99.10.4 that fixes the STAT, LIST and
UIDL POP3 command output in the case that they're issued after one or
more messages have been deleted.
Examples of incorrect behavior (bad spots marked with '***')
C: STAT
S: +OK 2 806
C: LIST
S: +OK 2 messages:
S: 1 403
S: 2 403
S: .
C: UIDL
S: +OK
S: 1 1076749908.12
2004 May 27
4
Small change to make dovecot pop3 uw-imap migration friendly
Hi,
today I've finished migration from uw-imap daemons to shiny and fast
dovecot. With thanks of dovecot my mail server load average drops by factor
of ten even with ancient unix mailboxes. ;-)
So, the only thing I've discovered is what POP3 uidls are different than
ones used in the uw-imap. Luckily, the difference are only in the format
string used in uidl response. So, I've
2019 Mar 28
2
Mitigation / disable FTS and pop3-uidl plugin was Re: CVE-2019-7524: Buffer overflow when reading extension header from dovecot index files
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
On 28 March 2019 16:37 Kevin A. McGrail via dovecot <
<a href="mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org">dovecot@dovecot.org</a>> wrote:
</div>
2008 Oct 23
2
Dovecot returns the same UIDL for another message
Hello,
I have a serious problem with dovecot and mbox format.
dovecot returns the same UIDL for new messages and as result some MUAs don't
retrieve new mail.
UIDs returned by UIDL command look like 000000*1c*49006cec
And there is a moment when dovecot stops incrementing marked digits.
In other words when new message arrive to mbox, UIDL command returns used UID.
I'll show with example:
2006 Oct 13
1
dovecot tpop3d UIDL mbox
Hello All!
I am new to this list so I hope I'm not in the wrong list with my question.
First, I have to say that dovecot is (in my opinion) one of the best POP3/IMAP
servers arround. I especialy like its' simplicity (configuration) and
powerfullness (speed, auth mechs).
In my production environment I would like to cange from tpop3d to dovecot, but I
have only one little problem :).
2009 May 13
2
X-UIDL Ignored?
Hello!
I am trying to migrate from Teapop to Dovecot.
I'm using Dovecot 1.1.14.
I need to make use of the X-UIDL header so clients don't download
messages they've already received.
I have the X-UIDL head in the message.
I have pop3_reuse_xuidl(pop3): yes
My problem is the X-UIDL in the message is being ignored and Dovecot is
still generating it's own.
The INBOX is an mbx
2008 Nov 27
3
UIDL question
Hi all,
I'm migrating a Postfix + Dovecot 1.0 server with mboxes to Qmail + Dovecot
1.4 with Maildirs and encounter the following the problem.
Using perfect-maildir.pl from: http://perfectmaildir.home-dn.net/ i can
relatively succesfully convert the mbox to a Maildir. The problem, however
is that clients with "leave mail on server" set to on retrieve all email a
2nd time.
I
2007 Feb 06
2
POP3 UIDL
I have installed rc22 and tried it with my mbox-based mail - fine.
Then I converted that mbox to Maildir to see if new feature (saving
state without QUIT) works -
first run - I get time out. Second run - I get rest of the Maildir
scanned and get into mailbox. Fine.
but....
# telnet enders2 110
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1).
Escape character is '^]'.
2013 May 15
1
Fatal: Can't finish POP3 UIDL command
I have been setting up a new mail server and copied our client's old mail to
it. The old server has Courier (under Plesk), we're using Dovecot on the new
server.
Most accounts seem to work fine (under IMAP or POP3), but for a few we're
getting the following in the /var/log/mail.err.
Error: Message ordering changed unexpectedly (msg #1: storage seq 140 -> 1)
Fatal: Can't
2004 Sep 02
2
Workaround for outlook UIDL handling bug ??
Scenario: Using Dovecot 0.99.10.9 as pop3 server.
With delete on retrival off.
clients: outlook*
Problem: Everytihng work perfectly, except that outlooks keeps
re-downloading SOME mail over and over. Though it already got them.
No obvious pattern which, but only a small percentage.
First of I looked at dovecots UIDLs.
Initialy I thought it's broken (see my previous thread)
Sorry for even
2011 Jan 05
2
courier-dovecot-migrate.pl maintaining order of pop3 uidl's
Hi there,
I've just been experimenting with the latest courier-dovecot-migrate.pl
script and I notice that it favours keeping pop3 UIDL ordering rather
than IMAP UID preservation. There is this comment (line 312):
# POP3 clients may want to get POP3 UIDLs in the same order always.
# Preserve the order even if it causes IMAP UIDs to change.
Does anyone have details as to which
2004 Jul 22
0
[PATCH] POP3 CAPA command RFC violation
Hello,
looks like SASL capability reported by dovecot in response to POP3 CAPA
command doesn't conforms with rfc2449 which says:
Examples:
C: CAPA
S: +OK Capability list follows
S: TOP
S: USER
S: SASL CRAM-MD5 KERBEROS_V4
S: RESP-CODES
S: LOGIN-DELAY 900
S: PIPELINING