similar to: dovecot is crashing

Hello, I have a FC4 x64 server that I am configuring/testing. It had dovecot 0.99 loaded after I did a yum update. That worked great with mbox, the passwd file, and test users in /home/users/username. I would like to be able to authenticate virtual users by 'username at domain.com' and have them be able to use squirrelmail or Outlook/Outlook Express to access their email. Users have

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=478 Summary: Kernel panic - not syncing: Aiee, killing interrupt handler! Product: iptables Version: 1.3.5 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Component: iptables AssignedTo:

I just downloaded dovecot 1.0b3 and running "make install" gives me an error This seems like a fairly simple bug in the Makefile ... but I'm not sure if maybe its a symptom of something more complex. I've tried "make uninstall" , "make install" and removing the entire /usr/local/lib/dovecot tree and same thing. dovecot does run ... but for other reasons

I installed the xen 2.6 binary tarball on my Linux 2.6 Fedora Core x86 system and added the entry to the grub.con file. I am still not able to get it up and working. It keeps restarting itself during the boot process. I''ve managed to capture the contents of the boot at the end before it restarts: error opening /dev/console error dup2''ing fd of 0 to 0 error

Hi, A couple of our important servers, both running FC4 but one i386 and one x86_64, have been crashing recently. They both are running ext3 data=journal with large external journals and high commit intervals. Both machines use the gdth driver for their hardware RAID sets, if that's of any use. I think the hardware is good in both cases. I hope someone finds this data useful enough to be

I am attempting to deploy a TE210P with one port configured (all 24 channels) as Cisco HDLC, currently running 2.6.11 FC4 with HDLC module compiled. HDLC (RAW) appears to work fine, however, using Cisco HDLC (via sethdlc & sethdlc-new) results in no traffic being encapsulated or transmitted via the hdlc0 interface. Is there anybody here currently running a similar configuration on a

<pre>I have a machine with the follow specs.<br /><br />Linux hermes.business.com 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4 #1 Thu Jun 2 22:55:56 EDT 2005<br />i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux<br /><br />pam-0.79-8<br />dovecot-0.99.14-4.fc4<br /><br />No one is able to receive e-mails due to authentication failures and yesterday afternoon<br />they were able to.<br

Hello! What do the following messages mean? Jul 24 13:07:20 box dovecot: pop3-login: Can't connect to auth server at default: Resource temporarily unavailable Jul 24 13:07:20 box dovecot: imap-login: Can't connect to auth server at default: Resource temporarily unavailable Jul 24 13:07:20 box dovecot: pop3-login: Can't connect to auth server at default: Resource temporarily

The third BETA build of the 10.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, powerpc64 and sparc64 architectures. The image checksums follow at the end of this email. ISO images and, for architectures that support it, the memory stick images are available here: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/10.0/ (or any of the FreeBSD

Hi I have a small problem with building a rpm of dovecot. I normally build rpms from the tar balls to install on our servers. With beta 3 I'm getting the error below. It builds fine if it is left stock with no ldap support. This the snip from the .spec file I put the --with-ldap as I require ldap support however this is stoping it from building. %configure \ --with-ldap \

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta3.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta3.tar.gz.sig Please try and report any bugs. Beta2 still had a few bad bugs, but I'm hoping this release is near a usable state. I've been a bit busy with school lately so I haven't had time/energy to answer mails in here. The main reason has been this lab course

Help... Both beta4 and now beta5 die immediately at startup for me: Apr 7 14:29:32 emerald dovecot: [ID 474997 mail.info] Dovecot v1.0.beta5 starting up Apr 7 14:29:33 emerald dovecot: [ID 128275 mail.error] Auth process died too early - shutting down My setup: Solaris 9, built with gcc 4.1.0, IMAP only, mbox format, INBOXes NFS mounted, index and other mail folders local disk. Beta3

Hi, I was getting an odd error installing rails-3.0.0.beta3 on a fresh Ubuntu 10.04 install. The same exact error was occurring on my Ubuntu 9.10 install, so I''m sure it isn''t something specific to the Ubuntu version (nor beta for that matter). This is the error: mike@ubuntu:~/rubygems-1.3.6$ sudo gem1.9.1 install rails --pre Successfully installed activesupport-3.0.0.beta3

The PDF file on the web, which is an appendix on nonlinear regression associated with the CAR book, is very nice. When I ran through the code presented there, I found something odd. The code does a certain model in 3 ways: Vanilla NLS (using numerical differentation), Analytical derivatives (where the user supplies the derivatives) and analytical derivatives (using automatic differentiation). The

Here's what I get. Btw I'm on Linux/UltraSparc: gcc -std=gnu99 -g -O2 -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wpointer-arith -Wchar-subscripts -Wformat=2 -Wbad-function-cast -o deliver deliver.o duplicate.o imparse.o mail-send.o map.o sieve-cmu.o smtpclient.o -Wl,--export-dynamic libsieve/libsieve.a /root/luca/dovecot-1.0.beta3/src/lib-storage/register/libstorage-register.a

Hi everybody, we try to migrate our IMAP service from uw-imap to dovecot because of horrible server slowdown when a lot of people poking in theirs huge imap folders. So, I try to run testing instance of dovecot on different imap port (12143) I have trouble with authentication by PAM module of MIT Kerberos. It successfuly works for authentificate users of wu-imap but not for dovecot. I see in

Dear List, Is the latest test version suitable for production systems? Our current servers use 0.99 on FC4 and we would like to add shared folders via the test version. Has anyone migrated this way before? Thanks, Gavin. -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 742001 E ghenry at suretecsystems.com Open Source. Open

Hi! I write a gem at the moment. The Gem need to register during the process in the rack middleware. So I make an folder "rack" inside my "lib" folder. I called the file "request.rb" because it keeps track of requests. So we speaking about the file /lib/rack/request.rb But even if I place an empty file on this, I get the following:

Dear All I'm attempting to speed up my model building procedure, but need some help with the loops I've created...please bear with me through the explanation! My basic model call is something like: m0sulf.nlme<-nlme(conc~beta0*exp(-beta1*day)+beta2*exp(-beta3*day), data=m0sulf, fixed=(beta0+beta1+beta2+beta3~1),

On (06/14/19 11:50), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > dmesg > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: GPU lockup - switching to software fbcon > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: fifo: SCHED_ERROR 0a [CTXSW_TIMEOUT] > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: fifo: runlist 0: scheduled for recovery > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: fifo: channel 5: killed > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: fifo: engine 6: scheduled for recovery >