similar to: IMAP and Outlook XP Contacts

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:57 AM, George Dunlap <dunlapg at umich.edu> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Sarah Newman <srn at prgmr.com> wrote: >> By default, /var/lib/xenstored is mounted tmpfs in centos 5 but this doesn't appear to be true for Xen4CentOS. This can cause performance issues as >> mentioned in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446089

Hi list, first of all, many thanks to the Dovecot authors for supplying an IMAP server that works well with M$-Outlook! I have used UW-imapd for quite a while and was annoyed by frequent "imap...timeout..." error messages. Now I'd like to give maildir format a try because I want to use email sub-folders. What are other Outlook users' experiences with maildir? Is it as

Well after the 'issues' with Compaq C, I decided to attempt compile using GCC-3.4.3... To put it short, that didn't fair well either. Will L G. Redhat 7.2 [Alpha] GCC 3.4.3 Binutils-2.16.x Kernel-2.6.13.4 ccache gcc-3.4.3 -std=gnu99 -g -O5 -finline -fstrict-aliasing -fomit-frame-pointer -mieee -w -mtune=ev56 -mmax -pipe -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wl,-lots -Wl,-lcpml -Wall -W

Is it possible in any way to use an Outlook contacts database as the source for the internal Asterisk database that is used for callerid lookups? Thanks!

Hello, What the subject says. I am trying, that is. OK, here's the story. Users very lazy. Don't want to write down their contact details from scratch. Here's what I thought : migrate (export?) contacts from outlook to mozilla thunderbird. Then find a way to make thunderbird "talk" to dovecot, so that the latter can import the contact details from mozilla tb. Any ideas ?

hi, we migrate from exchange to dovecot. we do it with imapsync. first we try to do it with --syncinternaldates, but this fails on many messages with invalid date, so we drop this option. unfortunately after this those users who use outlook see the received date as the date we do the migration in stead of the real received date. other clients eg webmail, thunderbird etc sees the right date. so my

Dear Sirs, what can You advice on sharing MS Outlook Conatacs & Calendar for samba domain ? (I did some investigation on this subject, but I didn't find any beautiful solution at all) Cheers, Ilia Chipitsine

Hi, Can any one guide me how to import the outlook contacts using rails. Thanks, Chandra. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

> This test seems PARTICULARLY noisy for some reason. Take a look at this: > [...] > ... the native version swings from 3.13-3.34s and the llc-ls version > swings from 3.83-4.0s. The C backend is also noisy, swinging from > 3.98-4.58s. FWIW, these tests are on a Intel P4 Xeon 3.06Ghz machine with > HT enabled. In any case, it appears that we're slower than GCC on this one.

I have a particular AD domain which, due to hardware- and OS-related issues, is still at version 4.8.12. It is finally possible to upgrade the system. If I add a new version 4.19 DC to the domain, will it replicate correctly from version 4.8.12, or will I need to upgrade in phases, from major version to major version? The current DCs would then be removed from the domain and scrapped. Any tips,

> This is all swinging on my interpretation of first-class structs though. I am > under the impression that they are essentially a set of registers holding > their first-class fields. So you can pass them by value as arguments to > functions with the behaviour of any other first-class type regardless of > where they came from. This is not true in general and highly target- and

Greetings everyone, I was about to compare AEC performance between 1.1.12 and 1.2beta1 when I noticed something. If I configure (and compile) speex-1.1.12 with ./configure --enable-shared=no --enable-static=yes it compiles and works as expected: I can run a mic and speaker signal through testecho, it runs in a reasonable amount of time (about 23 secs for 3 minutes of audio) and I get back

On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, [koi8-r] "Valery A.Khamenya[koi8-r] " wrote: > i took a look into LLVM benchmarks from nightly tester and > ran Shootout tests on my own. Below go just few outlines. > > 1. results on my AMD AthlonXP and Xeon used by LLVM > team are different sometime. In particular, both Shootout > and Shootout-C++ show great speed up with LLVM (in >

>> Is it possible in any way to use an Outlook contacts database as the >> source for the internal Asterisk database that is used for callerid >> lookups? You could do it with some simple CDO or MAPI calls but the overhead would be brutal and you'd never get the data in time unless you were running the CDO or MAPI calls on a dedicated Exchange server. If the data doesn't

Has anyone found an ITSP that will relay T.38 fax to an asterisk 1.6.x instance AND do it reliably? If so, I can think of a number of locations with copper loops that could be scrapped. I'm actually quite surprised at what an underwhelming number of ITSP's that say they support T.38 (zero so far among my normal go-to companies). For locations that just want to be able to send

To start with, I'd like to praise the entire Samba Team, Samba 2.2.3.a compiled and installed perfected. I wish all vendors could do that good of job. Great documentation too! KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK. Now that the "cheese" is over with... I posted a problem the other day concerning the funtionality between Outlook XP .PST files and Samba 2.2.2 & 2.0.7 on Solaris 2.6 As it

Is it safe to assume that a fresh CVS build will not have the SIP translation problem described? Regards, Christopher --__--__-- Message: 11 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:45:40 -0700 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com From: "Ernest W. Lessenger" <ernest@oacys.com> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Is somthing broken? Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com At 12:33 PM 9/29/2003, you

Mark Haney wrote: > On 09/07/2017 01:57 PM, hw wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> is there anything that speaks against putting a cyrus mail spool onto a >> btrfs subvolume? >> > I might be the lone voice on this, but I refuse to use btrfs for anything, much less a mail spool. I used it in production on DB and Web servers and fought corruption issues and scrubs

I'll try to make some shorter samples later, but for now here are the ones I have tried with: http://www.surfnonstop.com/~bandit/speex/1.2beta1_AEC_garble/ The original recordings are in mic.raw and spk.raw. Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > You may have triggered an instability problem. Can you upload your files > somewhere so I can have a look at them? > > Jean-Marc > > Andras

We originally purchased a TE405P so we could connect our Asterisk server directly to the T1 PRI from our provider, however due to all the problems reported with T1 PRI's interacting directly with Asterisk, we scrapped that idea and decided to stick with our Cisco router making the conversion to SIP. Anyways, we found a new potential use for it. We have an old location with an existing PBX,