similar to: Programming Help

user {''username'': uid => 501, gid => ''staff'', comment => ''comment'', ensure => present, home => ''/Users/sysop'', shell =>

Thanks for looking at this, and developing rsync. Really useful program that I rely on. Bit of a newbie but I couldn't find anything on this in these archives. Hopefully it's a really stupid question! I'm trying to backup using cp -al and then rsync -auR --delete backup idea basically as per http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/#Incremental. I have a separate

Hi System debian 8.11 dovecot-2.2.36.4 and I have some warnings in log likes: Warning: Inotify watch limit for user exceeded, disabling. Increase /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_watches cat /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_watches 8192 in sysctl i change #fs.inotify.max_user_watches= 8192 #fs.inotify.max_user_instances = 16384 fs.inotify.max_user_watches= 16384 fs.inotify.max_user_instances =

Hi, dovecot (1.0.alpha5) won't compile with inotify support because inotify.h can't be found. I'm running Linux 2.6.15-rc5 with headers from 2.6.12 (like most vendors). I've noticed that beagle and other inotify-enabled applications ships with an inotify.h. Could this be scheduled for alpha6? :-)

hi, the current code has changed include linux/inotify.h to sys/inotify.h since 2006-01-17, but that won't work with inotify*.h as documented in the wiki. One has to either revert back to linux/inotify.h, or add #include <sys/inotify-syscalls.h> to both configure.in and src/lib/ioloop-notify-inotify.c Or, just symlink sys/inotify.h -> linux/inotify.h. That's on Debian 3.1

Hello, I've a problem on my system with inotify. In the smbd logfile are shown a lot messages like this: [2015/06/10 11:15:21.644453, 0, pid=57030, effective(12700, 100), real(0, 0)] smbd/notify_inotify.c:297(inotify_setup) Failed to init inotify - Too many open files [2015/06/10 11:15:23.968497, 0, pid=57030, effective(12700, 100), real(0, 0)] smbd/notify_inotify.c:297(inotify_setup)

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:32:40PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 07:09:02PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 07:10:25AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > > > Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > >> What is the error message? > > > > > > > > /usr/include/asm-generic/fcntl.h:117: error: redefinition

Hi Reuben, I hope you don't mind me copying the dovecot list again. > dovecot: Aug 21 04:08:22 Error: IMAP(reuben): inotify_rm_watch() failed: > Invalid argument Odd. > This is with a 2.6.13-rc6-mm1 release. I've posted to LKML because there is > also a kernel stack produced at one point which looks inotify related (but the > messages above are contant). > See

There is the ability to notify the client already. If you developed against libgfapi you could do it (I think). On May 3, 2018 9:28:43 AM PDT, lemonnierk at ulrar.net wrote: >Hey, > >I thought about it a while back, haven't actually done it but I assume >using inotify on the brick should work, at least in replica volumes >(disperse probably wouldn't, you wouldn't get

I've added this to our klibc copy in the udev tree to support the recently added Inotify. Thanks, Kay -------------- next part -------------- diff --git a/klibc/klibc/SYSCALLS.def b/klibc/klibc/SYSCALLS.def --- a/klibc/klibc/SYSCALLS.def +++ b/klibc/klibc/SYSCALLS.def @@ -114,6 +114,9 @@ int lchown32,lchown::lchown(const char * int getcwd::__getcwd(char *, size_t) <?> int utime(const

Hi, I note that dovecot supported inotify from -test77, and now the Linux kernel supports it starting from linux-2.6.13-rc3. So in theory I should be set to go. I'm using an -mm kernel, and it was built with inotify, on FC4/devel. However when trying to build with it using --with-notify=inotify, I always seem to be getting this message: checking for poll... yes configure: error:

hi guys will we have gluster with inotify? some point / never? thanks, L.

Dear all :) I have been upgraded dovecot today and I get following errors: Jun 14 12:08:54 [dovecot] IMAP(adnae@xxxxxx.xxx): inotify_init() failed: Function not implemented Jun 14 12:08:54 [dovecot] IMAP(auftrag@xxxxxxx.xxx): inotify_init() failed: Function not implemented Jun 14 12:08:54 [dovecot] IMAP(swolf@xxxxxx.xxx): inotify_init() failed: Function not implemented I have a 64 bit

Hi, I recently switched from courier imap to dovecot. With courier I had a working IDLE setup that informed me immediately when new mail arrived. With Dovecot it is different, sometimes i get an immediate result but most of the time it takes a rather long time for the notification to return to the client. For testing purposes I set mailbox_idle_check_interval = 1 and i now get the same

Hi, I'm trying to compile Dovecot beta2 with inotify support, but this is unsuccessfull. First, it seems that the configure script is looking for inotify.h in /usr/include/sys, whereas it is in /usr/include/linux on my Debian Sarge system. But that's a minor point, let's make a symlink. % dpkg -S /usr/include/linux/inotify.h linux-kernel-headers: /usr/include/linux/inotify.h % dpkg

./configure --bundled-libraries && make ............ [3638/3880] Linking default/source4/lib/policy/py-policy.so [3639/3880] Linking default/source4/auth/ntlm/libauth4.so [3640/3880] Linking default/source4/ntvfs/libntvfs.so default/source4/ntvfs/sysdep/inotify_1.o: In function `inotify_setup': inotify.c:(.text+0x503): undefined reference to `inotify_init'

Hi, I am compiling dovecot and I found dnotify & inotify. What does dnotify or inotify do ? do i need it. Thanks

Hi, I've seen some chatter on NFS boards about kqueue being more reliable than inotify when used in NFSv3 and NFSv2. The chatter is a bit old so I don't know if it is true anymore. Anyone have pro/con experience with dovecot on the inotify/kqueue question when using NFS storage? I realize that kqueue is probably a bit slower and causes some delay with IDLE. Also, it may not really

On Tuesday 23 September 2014 17:20:35 Hu Tao wrote: > Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > daemon/inotify.c | 12 +++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) While I'd personally get rid of PATH_MAX at all, I understand the Linux inotify implementation relies on it... > > diff --git a/daemon/inotify.c b/daemon/inotify.c > index

Is Inotify **fully supported** by OCFS2? Thank you