similar to: How to have a "public" readonly folder?

The PDF file on the web, which is an appendix on nonlinear regression associated with the CAR book, is very nice. When I ran through the code presented there, I found something odd. The code does a certain model in 3 ways: Vanilla NLS (using numerical differentation), Analytical derivatives (where the user supplies the derivatives) and analytical derivatives (using automatic differentiation). The

The cautions people have given about starting values are worth heeding. That nlxb() does well in many cases is useful, but not foolproof. And John Fox has shown that the problem can be tackled very simply too. Best, JN On 2023-08-19 18:42, Paul Bernal wrote: > Thank you so much Dr. Nash, I truly appreciate your kind and valuable contribution. > > Cheers, > Paul > > El El

Hello, I would like to use the parfm package: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/parfm/parfm.pdfhttps://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/parfm/parfm.pdf in my work. This package fits parametric frailty models to survival data. To ensure I was using it properly, I started by running some small simulations to generate some survival data (without any random effects), and analyse the data using

Hi, I am trying to covert a Winbugs code into R code. Here is the winbugs code model{# model’s likelihoodfor (i in 1:n){time[i] ~ dnorm( mu[i], tau ) # stochastic componenent# link and linear predictormu[i] <- beta0 + beta1 * cases[i] + beta2 * distance[i]}# prior distributionstau ~ dgamma( 0.01, 0.01 )beta0 ~ dnorm( 0.0, 1.0E-4)beta1 ~ dnorm( 0.0, 1.0E-4)beta2 ~ dnorm( 0.0, 1.0E-4)#

Hello everybody, i already searched the archieves, but i still don't know what is wrong in my implementation, mybe anybody coud give me some advice ll1<-function(rho,theta,beta1,beta2,beta3,beta4,t,Szenariosw5,Testfaellew5,X1,X2) { n<-length(t) t<-cumsum(t) tn<-t[length(t)] Szenn<-Szenariosw5[length(Szenariosw5)]

What's up fellows... I am a begginer in R and i am trying to find the parameters of one likelihood function, but when i otimize it, always appers a error or advertisement and the solve does not occur. The problem seems like that: "lMix<-function(pars,y){ beta1<-pars[1] beta2<-pars[2] beta3<-pars[3] beta4<-pars[4] beta5<-pars[5] alfa1<-pars[6]

Dear all I used R2WinBUGS package's bugs() function to generate MCMC results. Then I tried to save the simulation draws in R, using read.bugs() function. Here is a simple test: ###################### library(coda) library(R2WinBUGS) #fake some data to test beta0=1 beta1=1.5 beta2=-1 beta3=2 N=200 x1=rnorm(N, mean=0,sd=1) x2=rnorm(N, mean=0,sd=1) x3=rnorm(N, mean=0,sd=1) lambda2= exp(beta0+

Hello to all, I have been using an optim with the following call: optim(param_ini,fun_errores2,Precio_mercado=Precio,anos_pagosE2=anos_pagos,control=list(maxit=10000,reltol=1e-16)) depending on the intial values I'm getting the same solution but once I get the convergence message=10 (no convergence) and for the others I get convergence message = 0 Solution1: $par beta1

Dear all, I considered an ordinary ridge regression problem. I followed three different ways: 1. estimate beta without any standardization 2. estimate standardized beta (standardizing X and y) and then again convert back 3. estimate beta using lm.ridge() function X<-matrix(c(1,2,9,3,2,4,7,2,3,5,9,1),4,3) y<-t(as.matrix(cbind(2,3,4,5))) n<-nrow(X) p<-ncol(X) #Without

Dear all, For an ordinary ridge regression problem, I followed three different approaches: 1. estimate beta without any standardization 2. estimate standardized beta (standardizing X and y) and then again convert back 3. estimate beta using lm.ridge() function X<-matrix(c(1,2,9,3,2,4,7,2,3,5,9,1),4,3) y<-as.matrix(c(2,3,4,5)) n<-nrow(X) p<-ncol(X) #Without standardization

Thank you so much Dr. Nash, I truly appreciate your kind and valuable contribution. Cheers, Paul El El s?b, 19 de ago. de 2023 a la(s) 3:35 p. m., J C Nash < profjcnash at gmail.com> escribi?: > Why bother. nlsr can find a solution from very crude start. > > Mixture <- c(17, 14, 5, 1, 11, 2, 16, 7, 19, 23, 20, 6, 13, 21, 3, 18, 15, > 26, 8, 22) > x1 <- c(69.98, 72.5,

Here is my code, which plots three lines with errorbar. How could I add an extra line without errorbar to the plot? Thank you very much. beta.data <- data.frame ( method = rep(c("Wrong", "Correct", "Full Bayes"), each = T_obs), mean.beta = c(mean.beta1, mean.beta2, mean.beta3), t = rep(points, 3), std.beta = c(std.beta1, std.beta2, std.beta3) ) limits =

Is there a way to do hierarchical (bayesian) logistic regression in R, the way we do it in BUGS? For example in BUGS we can have this model: model {for(i in 1:N) { y[i] ~ dbin(p[i],n[i]) logit(p[i]) <- beta0+beta1*x1[i]+beta2*x2[i]+beta3*x3[i] } sd ~ dunif(0,10) tau <- pow(sd, -2) beta0 ~ dnorm(0,0.1) beta1 ~ dnorm(0,tau) beta2 ~ dnorm(0,tau) beta3 ~

Hi to all the people, I'm having a trouble when trying to plot a quadratic function. I have the code: regression<-nls(Survival~beta1+beta2*PI+beta3*PI^2, data=cubs, start=list(beta1 = 1, beta2 = 1, beta3 = 1)) plot(Survival~PI,data=cubs, ylab="Survival", xlab="PI") lines(cubs$PI, fitted(regression)) but the plotted line is not the quadratic one, rather it appears a

Hi there, Suppose mu is constant, and error is normally distributed with mean 0 and fixed variance s. I need to find a statistics that: Y_i = mu + beta1* I1_i beta2*I2_i + beta3*I1_i*I2_i + +error, where I_i is 1 Y_i is from group A, and 0 if Y_i is from group B. It is large when beta1=beta2=0 It is small when beta1 and/or beta2 is not equal to 0 How can I find it by R? Thank you very much

I need to make nonlinear regression with the posterior script, but how is the problem? I have error in library (nls), package 'nls' has been merged into 'stats'. I need help? What other forms I have to make nonlinear regression? and how I find to calculate statistics y residuals, scatterplot. thanks SCRIPT ros<-read.table("Dataset.csv",header=T,sep=",")

Hi, I encoded some songs into 350 kbit/s with beta2 and beta3 too, and I don't know why, but it seems the b2 sounds better (makes a better quality ogg file)... The b2 contains more the b3 contains less high sounds. And with the b3, the size of file is smaller with 4-5%... Do you know this problem, or do you think so, that the sound quality is good (or better in the b3) ?? Please be carefull

Dear all,I am a new user of WinBUGS and need your help. After running the following code, I got parameters of beta0 through beta4 (stats, density), but I don't know how to get the prediction of the last value of h, the variable I set to NA and want to model it using the following code.Does anyone can given me a hint? Any advice would be greatly appreciated.Best

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta3.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta3.tar.gz.sig Please try and report any bugs. Beta2 still had a few bad bugs, but I'm hoping this release is near a usable state. I've been a bit busy with school lately so I haven't had time/energy to answer mails in here. The main reason has been this lab course

I have tried beta2, beta3 and now back to 1.2.12.1 and I have correct DTMF tones 25% of the time. I have to call several times to enter an extension. I have a router and a packet shaper and some other stuff. Anyone have any other ideas why this might happen. I do not have any Zap channels but I am running CentOS4. I also do not have any cards installed. Thanks