similar to: In-memory Index file bug

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "In-memory Index file bug"

2006 Jun 16
1
Dovecot+NFS: Copying messages causes failures (possible SIGABRT)
Environment: Dovecot 1.0beta8 Host: 64 bit Red Hat AS4 Linux (2.6.9-34.0.1) Disks: NFS netapp In the case below, the two connections were going through two separate servers sharing disks via an NFS NetApp. Here is the sequence of operations: 1. Open a connection to a folder (say mail/Trash) 2. Open a connection to another folder (say Inbox) 3. Move messages from Inbox to Trash using this
2006 Feb 15
1
Dovecot RFC non-compliance: Mailbox names
Hi, I think I already know the answer to this and I agree with it, but I have a question about "invalid" mailbox naming decisions in dovecot. Technically, RFC3501 (Section 5.1, pg. 18, client consideration 3) says that * and % are legal in mailbox names, though it implicitly discourages their use. We just migrated to dovecot, and unfortunately have a few users who used * in their
2006 Feb 15
1
NFS Stale File Handles on Indexes
The configuration files has settings that seem to address the issues of using indexes on NFS (i.e. locking and mmap fixes), but we are using Dovecot on NFS, and when the load gets high we start to see a lot of NFS stale file handle errors, particularly with MS clients like Outlook. I see the discussion about these errors from last year. Any updates on the state of the code? Should we be using
2006 May 15
2
RFC 3501 compliance issue: body-type-msg incorrect
Hi, I am using Dovecot 1.0 beta 7, moving to beta8 probably tomorrow. I am seeing a few RFC compliance issues with IMAP responses. I have an in-house IMAP client that caches IMAP data for a web mail system (it parses millions of IMAP interactions a day), and it reports whenever it gets a line that does not look RFC compliant. Unfortunately, users modify their mailboxes before I can get a copy
2006 Sep 26
1
Cache fields
Hi, We are using Dovecot with maildir, and the mail client requests flags, internaldate, and uid for all messages on folder open, which on average takes 3 seconds, but for large folders is much longer. It seems like I want mail_cache_fields to include "flags", but which date corresponds to internaldate? date.received? Is UID always cached for messages, or does it have to read through
2006 Feb 07
0
Any change of integrating this patch???
There was a patch posted to fix dotfile folder names in this mail: http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2005-July/008127.html I have a web mail client (which stores preferences in a dot-file/folder through IMAP) and pine users (address book is a dot-folder in IMAP) that this affects. I can certainly hand-apply the patch, but I'd feel a lot more comfortable if this had some future in the real
2006 Mar 15
1
Filesystem full/quota limitations and Dovecot
How does Dovecot handle accounts when writes are denied, such as in situations when a user is over quota, or the filesystem is full? -- Anthony Kay University Computing Center (541) 346-1719 GPG Fingerprint: B0DB D46A 60AF FAE7 A94A 5075 0CB4 4D88 9F4F 7F09 Only a statue can be perfect, and even then it casts a shadow. - Merle Fossum
2006 Oct 09
1
RFC compliance on folder lists
If a mail folder contains quotes, the IMAP server may respond with a line like: 1 list "" "a/b/"X" Y Z" The specific example I saw had this exact form (it was in a nested folder, and one of the words was quoted). -- Anthony Kay University Computing Center (541) 346-1719 GPG Fingerprint: B0DB D46A 60AF FAE7 A94A 5075 0CB4 4D88 9F4F 7F09 Physics is like sex: sure,
2006 Oct 09
0
IGNORE: RFC compliance report
I mis-read the line. -- Anthony Kay University Computing Center (541) 346-1719 GPG Fingerprint: B0DB D46A 60AF FAE7 A94A 5075 0CB4 4D88 9F4F 7F09 This isn't right. This isn't even wrong. Wolfgang Pauli
2006 Feb 06
3
Mac mail copy/delete problems w/1.0b2
Hi, Mac mail (a horribly mis-behaved client, it seems), has a horribly hard time deleting/copying large blocks of messages from one folder to another. The basic symptom is: 1. Select a bunch of messages 2. Click on delete 3. Wait for a _very_ long time. It also seems very slow on copying, so it may be the "trash folder copy on delete" that is really slowing it down. Anybody else seen
2006 Feb 02
1
mbox to maildir conversion on a user-by-user basis!
In the midst of evaluating Dovecot for use in solving some mbox locking issues (while also waiting for our eventual migration to maildir), I had an epiphany. It looks like Dovecot's auto-detection of mail formats would allow us to migrate from mbox to maildir on a user-by-user basis! I was thinking: 1. Let dovecot autodetect mail storage 2. Use some procmail trickery to detect which format
2006 Jan 30
5
Question about Dovecot and NFS
Hi, We are using mbox and UW IMAP, and are having issues because UW IMAP does not support multiple client access when you use NFS for the mail files. I've done some research (see the comments after my 2 questions below), and most of the other major IMAP servers simply don't support it (courier is about the only one that has a positive comment). How much testing have you done
2014 Jul 14
0
Panic: file mail-index.c: line 650 (mail_index_close): assertion failed: (index->open_count > 0)
Hello, I'm use the virtual plugin for list all unread messages in the public namespace. Every time the connection is terminated with this error message when I select the virtual/projekte mailbox. Do not show any emails. The version is build today from source 2.2.13.auto+102 Hardy *** dovecot-virtual *** !INBOX Projekte/* unseen ********************** *** part of dovecot -n *** #
2017 Nov 27
2
lmtp-Eroor
Hi! Am 2017-11-27 um 01:35 schrieb Stephan Bosch: > Op 11/27/2017 om 12:53 AM schreef Jakob Sch?rz: >> Hi There! >> >> I can not find anything about this message: >> >> dovecot[23202]: lmtp(jakob): Debug: Mailbox <lmtp DATA>: Opened mail >> UID=1 because: header Message-ID (Cache file is unusable) >> dovecot[23202]: lmtp(jakob): Debug: Mailbox
2016 Jul 14
3
Panic: file mail-transaction-log-file.c: line 104 (mail_transaction_log_file_free): assertion failed: (!file->locked)
2.2.25 (also happens on 2.2.24). Happens every time I try to make deliver and only for this user: Jul 14 09:52:02 mbox dovecot: lmtp(25601): Connect from local Jul 14 09:52:02 mbox dovecot: lmtp(powiadomienia): session=<CRU2EaJEh1cBZAAALZVUYQ>, Error: Index /var/mail/powiadomienia/dovecot.index: Lost log for seq=1009 offset=40: Missing middle file seq=1009 (between 1009..4294967295) Jul 14
2007 Jan 02
1
Dovecot 1.0-rc15 on Solaris 10
We are running Dovecot 1.0-rc15 on Solaris 10 and are starting to ramp up our user count and ran into a file descriptor limit: Jan 1 19:38:54 <hostname> dovecot: IMAP(username): Newly created index file is corrupted: /home/username/.imap/foldername/dovecot.index.tmp Jan 1 19:38:54 <hostname> dovecot: IMAP(username): file mail-index.c: line 1806 (mail_index_move_to_memory): assertion
2016 Nov 01
1
Panic: file mail-transaction-log-file.c: line 104 (mail_transaction_log_file_free): assertion failed: (!file->locked)
On 25.08.2016 10:29, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On 14.07.2016 10:56, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote: >> 2.2.25 (also happens on 2.2.24). Happens every time I try to make deliver >> and only for this user: >> >> Jul 14 09:52:02 mbox dovecot: lmtp(25601): Connect from local >> Jul 14 09:52:02 mbox dovecot: lmtp(powiadomienia): session=<CRU2EaJEh1cBZAAALZVUYQ>, Error:
2017 Nov 27
0
lmtp-Eroor
On 27.11.2017 08:37, Jakob Sch?rz wrote: > Hi! > > > Am 2017-11-27 um 01:35 schrieb Stephan Bosch: >> Op 11/27/2017 om 12:53 AM schreef Jakob Sch?rz: >>> Hi There! >>> >>> I can not find anything about this message: >>> >>> dovecot[23202]: lmtp(jakob): Debug: Mailbox <lmtp DATA>: Opened mail >>> UID=1 because: header
2018 Feb 05
1
Bug in dovecot 2.3 virtual plugin
Hi, did you have time to investigate about 'Panic: file unichar.c' bug ? Because I have the same problem with a 2.3.0 installation without virtual plugin. Thanks, Marco On 2018-01-03 16:52, Aki Tuomi wrote: > This is not a bug in virtual plugin, but in some email which contains invalid unicode sequence somehow. Can you send me a core file? This should not have occured ofc but
2006 Oct 20
4
1.0.rc10 status report
(Background: Relatively new to dovecot; looking to do transparent replacement of long-established UW-IMAP on cluster of Linux boxes which NFS-mount a shared "/var/spool/mail".) With rc8, where I had already increased "login_max_processes_count" from default 128 to 1024, we had still hit the issue of too many logins crashing dovecot, so that trial had only lasted a couple of