Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Dovecot 1.0b2 now in pkgsrc packaging system"
2009 Jun 25
2
Sieve/ManageSieve integration into pkgsrc
I'm integrating Sieve (the new one) and ManageSieve into wip/dovecot.
Currently, this works as dovecot options because dovecot must be built before sieve can be configured and sieve must be built before managesieve can be configured/built.
Now, the question arose what the long-term solution (in pkgsrc) should be.
To my understanding, with dovecot 2.0, ManageSieve will no longer need to patch
2009 Jan 28
5
pkgsrc provider for Package?
Hello
I''m wondering if anyone has looked into adding pkgsrc package
management as a provider for Package?
We use Joyent accelerators (zones on OpenSolaris) for our many of our
production services and about a year ago Joyent switched from
Blastwave to pkgsrc for userland packages.
pkgsrc catalog - http://pkgsrc.se/
pkgsrc guide - http://www.netbsd.org/docs/pkgsrc/
joyent pkgsrc
2005 Sep 01
2
Still weird UID ordering issues with maildir
Nightly 20050829 (includes everything currently in nightly/ChangeLog):
Sep 1 09:25:02 server dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<tv>, method=PLAIN, rip=192.168.1.1, lip=192.168.1.3, TLS
Sep 1 09:25:02 server dovecot: IMAP(tv): Maildir /home/tv/.maildir sync: UID < next_uid (1187 < 1188, file = 1125581033.7788_2.server.duh.org:2,)
repeated every time I try to login. I had to nuke the
2003 Jun 19
2
NetBSD pkgsrc maintanance
hi all,
i've taken over the maintainership of dovecot's pkgsrc on NetBSD -
please send me your ideas, questions and comments related to dovecot
on NetBSD.
FreeBSD's port has currently some more 'features' than the pkgsrc,
i'm going to add some of them - any feedback is appreciated.
bye,
TOM
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
2009 Feb 23
1
pkgsrc-ing sieve and managesieve
I'm trying to integrate both the new sieve implementation and managesieve into pkgsrc.
Managesieve seems to need some dovecot libraries that dovecot doesn't install (lib-storage/libstorage.a, lib-auth/libauth.a, lib-imap/libimap.a, lib-index/libindex.a, lib-mail/libmail.a, lib-charset/libcharset.a, lib-dict/libdict.a and lib-charset/libcharset.a). There seems to be no provision in pkgsrc
2004 Feb 22
0
dovecot-nightly/NetBSD - Fwd: CVS commit: wip/dovecot-nightly
hello everybody,
i just commited a pkgsrc for dovecot nightly cvs-snapshots
to the pkgsrc-wip repository for NetBSD - this will
hopefully go into base pkgsrc, soon.
please see http://pkgsrc-wip.sourceforge.net/ on how to
obtain pkgsrc-wip.
----- Forwarded message from Tom Hensel <tomhensel at users.sourceforge.net> -----
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 11:18:52 -0800
From: Tom Hensel
2006 Jan 18
6
Major CPU spike for SSL parameters?
I went from a nightly of about 20051117 or so (about alpha4 generation) to
1.0beta1 yesterday, and dovecot is now spinning the CPU furiously apparently
every ~10 minutes per:
Jan 18 13:04:36 server dovecot: SSL parameters regeneration completed
Jan 18 13:14:14 server dovecot: SSL parameters regeneration completed
Jan 18 13:24:00 server dovecot: SSL parameters regeneration completed
Jan 18
2023 Oct 02
1
release?
I stuck in a comment in an issue, but I think we're overdue, picking 6
months as arbitrary.
I just created a snapshot privately. It passes make check on netbsd 9
amd64. I am updating pkgsrc-wip, which involves adjusting a lot of
packages that I believe have been merged (yay!).
I wonder if anybody thinks that git master has regressions from 2.8.0
right now. I ask this partly about
2005 Aug 01
1
Dovecot 1.0-test77 endless loop hang
Client: Bynari Insight Connector 3.0.5. (http://www.bynari.net/)
This is an IMAP-based plugin for Outlook that can also store Outlook
collaboration objects (calendar, tasks, notes, etc.) in IMAP messages on the
server side. It does not require special server extensions, and it was
actually (mostly) working with 1.0-stable.
Below is a rawlog dump showing what is going back and forth. After
2003 Jun 23
0
new pkgsrc on NetBSD
hi all,
just updated the pkgsrc to build dovecot-0.99.10-rc2,
see
http://news.gw.com/netbsd.pkgsrc.changes/27698
for reference.
best regards,
TOM
2008 Jun 03
1
FreeBSD port for 1.1, some bits more...
I did (re-)compile dovecot (1.1rc8) today, with managesieve (0.10.2) and
sieve-plugin (1.1.5).
I did modify the existing dovecot-devel port, adding managesieve patch
as an OPTION, and I added a 'dovecot-managesieve-devel' port, and a
'dovecot-sieve-devel' one to be complete...
Not sure everything is very complete, but at least it works for me=E2=84=A2=
, and
if it can help anybody
2023 Oct 02
1
release?
Seconding ... or firsting, considering the recent call to testing hidden
somewhere in a recent mail post ;) Currently I'm aiming at cutting a NUT
2.8.1 release during October.
As a bit of self-imposed retrospective:
I did hope for a faster (quarterly or so) cadence when I made the 2.8.0
release, but then a few issues came up as regressions of 2.8.0 and it
became a sort of crusade to fix
2023 Oct 02
1
release?
Seconding ... or firsting, considering the recent call to testing hidden
somewhere in a recent mail post ;) Currently I'm aiming at cutting a NUT
2.8.1 release during October.
As a bit of self-imposed retrospective:
I did hope for a faster (quarterly or so) cadence when I made the 2.8.0
release, but then a few issues came up as regressions of 2.8.0 and it
became a sort of crusade to fix
2015 Oct 23
3
[AMDGPU] AMDGPUAsmParser fails to parse several instructions
Dear Developers,
I compile a OpenCL kernel, FFT, in AMDAPP SDK v2.5 using clang 3.8 + libclc
and assembling the code with lld (The LLVM linker). The assembly code
contains the following assembly codes (and lots of other similar format
assembly) that fails to be parsed by AMDGPUAsmParser. It seems to me that
both are valid instructions after looking at the SI instruction spec.
s_mov_b32 s0,
2023 Nov 09
2
2.8.1 build buglet: sockdebug.c
I am (belatedly) updating pkgsrc to 2.8.1 (+ bugfix).
(FWIW, I think a 2.8.1.1 or 2.8.2 immediately with the fix is in order.
>From a packaging viewpoint, the effort to update for a release is about
3 minutes plus time to adapt anythhing that has changed. So I'd much
rather have releases more often.)
In the pkgsrc build, nut finds tcp wrappers because they are part of the
base system.
2004 Dec 02
1
SunPro support
[ Sorry if this ends up multiple posted; your web pages still point ]
[ the mailing list archives at lists.sourceforge.net -- sketch ]
Hi,
I've committed patches to pkgsrc to get flac compiling with SunPro
under Solaris. As there are quite a number of small tweaks necessary,
I hoped you may be interested in merging them into flac to avoid me
having to keep the diffs up-to-date :-)
2007 Aug 21
4
[AWDwR] Confused about has_one and has_many
Heya everyone!
I am quite new to Rails and I am reading AWDwR. I am at Task E "Check
Out!". I understand it quite well, but I have a problem with the last
playground exercise: Add a Table which contains the payment types.
All goes well, but I am not sure whether I should use has_many or
has_one(as in the Playground wiki at
http://wiki.pragprog.com/cgi-bin/wiki.cgi/PT-E-3).
I use the
2023 Oct 27
1
release?
Hello, fellow NUTs!
This October proved to be a rather productive month, with several
developments wrapped up, as well as some issues with master codebase
behavior created, reported, fixed and tested :)
While we were not part of some official Hacktoberfest this year, it
pretty much felt like one - great thanks to everyone involved!
The month is also ending soon, so if we're to follow
2023 Oct 27
1
release?
Hello, fellow NUTs!
This October proved to be a rather productive month, with several
developments wrapped up, as well as some issues with master codebase
behavior created, reported, fixed and tested :)
While we were not part of some official Hacktoberfest this year, it
pretty much felt like one - great thanks to everyone involved!
The month is also ending soon, so if we're to follow
2023 May 22
2
got nut 2.8.1 but despite reinstall, shows 2.7.4
On 5/22/23 07:13, Greg Troxel wrote:
> gene heskett <gheskett at shentel.net> writes:
>
>> Which file in the nut I pulled a month ago, should I start with to get
>> the new version actually running? I still get - -V=2.7.4
>
> It is likely that you have built new nut but old nut is still on your
> system. I do a 'sudo make install' to write over the