similar to: dovecot lda with sendmail

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "dovecot lda with sendmail"

2010 Jul 12
3
deliver and root user
On RHEL5, dovecot 1.0.7, I have set up sendmail to use `deliver` for my local mda. It keeps giving me this error for the root user though: Jul 12 12:51:29 mail sendmail[4105]: o699225f001348: to=<root at localhost.localdomain>, ctladdr=<root at localhost.localdomain> (0/0), delay=3+08:49:26, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=local, pri=7502879, dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: local mailer
2007 Mar 30
2
Using Dovecot LDA with Sendmail
Hi all, After looking at the LDA/Sendmail page in the dovecot wiki, I wanted to contribute another method to easily configure Sendmail to use deliver. Instead of adding a new mailer definition, as already suggested, one can simply use the following line in their sendmail.mc file instead: FEATURE(`local_procmail', `/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver', `deliver -d $u',
2008 Oct 01
1
segfault in dovecot imap 1.1.1 to 1.1.3
Dovecot dies with signal 11 (segfault) when doing some commands with a specific message you'll find relevant information stored here: http://www.luria.ch/9e93676668e453b739ee3e085434e086/ the email: msg.anon.txt input rawlog: 20081001-120137-24371.in dovecot -n: dovecot-n.txt the gdb backtrace: bt.txt test system is running debian sarge, but same thing happens with debian etch (both x86)
2008 Oct 01
2
assertion in dovecot imap 1.1.1 to 1.1.3
Dovecot dies with signal 11 (segfault) when doing some commands with a specific message here attached: the email: msg.anon.txt input rawlog: 20081001-120137-24371.in dovecot -n: dovecot-n.txt test system is running debian sarge, but same thing happens with debian etch (both x86) using xfs always reproductible Can you help me with this ? -- Rene Luria -------------- next part
2013 Aug 05
1
How to configure sendmail using dovecot lmtp
Hi, I can't seems to find any posting on how to configure sendmail to use dovecot as lmtp. All I see is using it as LDA. I am particularly interested on how to tell sendmail to ask dovecot to deliver the message to the user. In the wiki for lda it says to add the following in the sendmail config: FEATURE(`local_procmail',
2015 Jan 18
2
sendmail not invoking dovecot-lda
hi dovecot mailinglist - Configuration FreeBSD-9.3 sendmail -d0.1 == sendmail-8.14.9 <<-- dovecot --version == dovecot-2.2.15 # =================================================================== # I'm trying to get sendmail to invoke dovecot.m4 ( dovecot-lda ) to # deliver emails to dovecot's virtual users ( /etc/dovecot/passwd ) # or mysql/postgresql virtual users #
2011 Jun 27
1
Sendmail + dovecot-lda + LDAP
Hi, I experince some problems with setting up Sendmail with the LDAP database for virtual mail accounts. Why i'm not writing to the LDAP mailing list? I believe, that the reason of my problem is in configuring dovecot-deliver. What i have: ?- FreeBSD ?- sendmail (Version 8.14.4 with LDAP support installed from ports)? ?- Dovecot LDA + dovecot (as pop3/imap) ?- Cyrus Sasl (authdaemon for
2009 Jun 10
1
Sendmail + Deliver as an LDA
Need help with setup/config. Current situation: (dovecot version : 1.1.7) we have system users and virtual users. (with different domains) Virtual users have procmail as LDA Now we want "deliver" to become the LDA I'm confused reading http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sendmail sendmail.mc: divert(-1) divert(0)dnl include(`/usr/share/sendmail-cf/m4/cf.m4')dnl
2011 Jan 05
1
dovecot + sendmail, what LDA setup?
I have an existing setup with sendmail, dovecot, on debian. I want to move LDA and move from using mbox to using Maildir. I have only 'real' users and aliases, no virtual users. What is a recommended, trouble free, LDA setup? procmail is of course on possibility, but I'd be unlikely ever to use any of its advanced features, just simple local mail delivery. I'd like to use
2012 Dec 31
1
From Sendmail to Dovecot mdbox, what is missing.
Sendmail 8.14.4 dovecot 2.0.9 I have sendmail working and it is sending mail to /var/mail/%u. I have dovecot working in that I can move emails into IMAP folders and I can send email through IMAP. I have set up dovecot to use mdbox based on the following: mail_location = mdbox:~/mail However, I seem to be lacking a key piece of information. Sendmail is sending the mail to /var/mail/%u as a
2011 Feb 14
1
Sendmail and Dovecot deliver (dovecot-lda)
Hi, I have a Centos 5 system with sendmail running as my MTA. Normally I note from sendmail logs that mails get delivered using the 'local' mailer. I have therefore entered the following into my sendmail.mc file, from an earlier post on this list: define(`LOCAL_MAILER_PATH',`/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver') define(`LOCAL_MAILER_FLAGS',`DFMPhfnu9')
2008 Aug 13
1
migrating from specialized qpopper
I'm hoping to migrate to dovecot from qpopper, with the eventual goal of enabling IMAP. However, my qpopper installation is fairly specialized, so I thought I'd ask here to see if anyone could get me headed down the best path. Here's the situation. I'm running FreeBSD and have a virtual domains setup with an extremely hacked LDA to do delivery to mailboxes within hashed
2009 Aug 18
2
ENC: postscript, options
I'm not shure but I guess that you miss a " and putted it in the wrong place! Try this: postscript("/pathto/filename.eps",horizontal=FALSE,onefile=FALSE) Hope It helps. -----Mensagem original----- De: r-help-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] Em nome de e-letter Enviada em: segunda-feira, 17 de agosto de 2009 10:11 Para: r-help at r-project.org
2010 Jun 12
2
[PATCH] fixup xen-4.0 xend to match changes in tools-python-prefix.diff
debian/patches/tools-python-prefix.diff removes auxbin.pathTo and replaces it with auxbin.path_bin and auxbin.path_boot. However there are still references to auxbin.pathTo in xend. The attached switches those usages to the correct new function. Without these I get: Error: 'module' object has no attribute 'pathTo' when trying to start a guest with
2007 Feb 21
2
pop3_lock_session
Hi guys, How can I modify the timeout value for the pop3_lock_session ? I'd like it to be much bigger.
2007 Feb 20
2
critical performance problem
I have been using dovecot 1.0alpha4 + deliver/sieve in production for a few accounts (400'000). After testing 1.0.rc22 I decided to upgrade one of the imap servers... And... what a mess ! The server just gets unusable. I don't know why but with new release, it just overloads the system with I/O. It turns that with 1.0.rc22 I get 15Mo/s read on disk average, without any reason. What did
2000 Jan 18
1
Mapping users folder on Win98
Hi all I was wondering if it is at all possible to have a users folder mapped when a user logs onto the server. I have a student lab here with 30 machine and have 400 users, they are connecting to a Linux server. We have given each user a space of 3Mb on the server so they can store their work on. I can creat a shortcut to the server so they can access it by double clicking on the shortcut.
2023 Aug 22
2
Is r2u at 3.4.1? [branch about handling package collisions under Ubuntu/Debian]
This is definitely tangential to the list: I'm on Ubuntu (22.04.2 LTS) not Debian and I'm sure this is about issues in the Ubuntu package management on my machine, R is only revealing them. The original subject line came from me wondering if my going over to the r2u repository would solve the problem.? However, as I think Dirk said, that's only really likely to be answered by trying
2005 Nov 27
2
installing apps correctly
Hi, I'm still struggling with my vfp app in wine. This time I removed all traces of my old deb 0.9.1 installation and did a compile from cvs. Using wine tools I got my base setup and M$ extras installed, and then installed my runtime app again using its own (wise) installer. The problem persists that it doesn't find its own dependencies if I fire it up from anything other than its top
2009 Sep 15
2
Building R package with .c sub-routine files
Lets say I have two source files file1.c and file2.c The latter just contains sub-routines to be used by the first. i.e. in file1.c I have the line #include "file2.c" Let's say "R CMD SHLIB file1.c" runs perfectly and I want to include the code in a package, "R CMD build" also runs fine but R CMD check" gives * checking whether package